In vivo wear determination of novel CAD/CAM ceramic crowns by using 3D alignment
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To determine wear amount of single molar crowns, made from four different restoratives, and opposing natural teeth through computerized fabrication techniques using 3D image alignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 24 single crowns (N = 24 patients, age range: 18 - 50) were made from lithium disilicate (IPS E-max CAD), lithium silicate and zirconia based (Vita Suprinity CAD), resin matrix ceramic material (Cerasmart, GC), and dual matrix (Vita Enamic CAD) blocks. After digital impressions (Cerec 3D Bluecam, DentsplySirona), the crowns were designed and manufactured (Cerec 3, DentsplySirona). A dualcuring resin cement was used for cementation (Variolink Esthetic DC, Ivoclar). Then, measurement and recording of crowns and the opposing enamel surfaces with the intraoral scanner were made as well as at the third and sixth month follow-ups. All measurements were superimposed with a software (David-Laserscanner, V3.10.4). Volume loss due to wear was calculated from baseline to follow-up periods with Siemens Unigraphics NX 10 software. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Repeated Measures for ANOVA (SPSS 21) at = .05 significance level. RESULTS. After 6 months, insignificant differences of the glass matrix and resin matrix materials for restoration/enamel wear were observed (P>.05). While there were no significant differences between the glass matrix groups (P>.05), significant differences between the resin matrix group materials (P<.05) were obtained. Although Cerasmart and Enamic were both resin matrix based, they exhibited different wear characteristics. CONCLUSION. Glass matrix materials showed less wear both on their own and opposing enamel surfaces than resin matrix ceramic materials.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To determine wear amount of single molar crowns, made from four different restoratives, and opposing natural teeth through computerized fabrication techniques using 3D image alignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 24 single crowns (N = 24 patients, age range: 18 - 50) were made from lithium disilicate (IPS E-max CAD), lithium silicate and zirconia based (Vita Suprinity CAD), resin matrix ceramic material (Cerasmart, GC), and dual matrix (Vita Enamic CAD) blocks. After digital impressions (Cerec 3D Bluecam, DentsplySirona), the crowns were designed and manufactured (Cerec 3, DentsplySirona). A dualcuring resin cement was used for cementation (Variolink Esthetic DC, Ivoclar). Then, measurement and recording of crowns and the opposing enamel surfaces with the intraoral scanner were made as well as at the third and sixth month follow-ups. All measurements were superimposed with a software (David-Laserscanner, V3.10.4). Volume loss due to wear was calculated from baseline to follow-up periods with Siemens Unigraphics NX 10 software. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Repeated Measures for ANOVA (SPSS 21) at = .05 significance level. RESULTS. After 6 months, insignificant differences of the glass matrix and resin matrix materials for restoration/enamel wear were observed (P>.05). While there were no significant differences between the glass matrix groups (P>.05), significant differences between the resin matrix group materials (P<.05) were obtained. Although Cerasmart and Enamic were both resin matrix based, they exhibited different wear characteristics. CONCLUSION. Glass matrix materials showed less wear both on their own and opposing enamel surfaces than resin matrix ceramic materials.
참고문헌 (19)
- Strub JR, "Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations : current systems and future possibilities", J Am Dent Assoc, 137, pp.1289~1296 (2006)
- Hugo Lambert, "Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD", CAM: State of the art, 2017, pp.9(6), 486~495[DOI]
- Bindl A, "Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD", CAM-generated posterior crowns, 2006, pp.22, 29~36
- Della Bona A, "Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material", Dent Mater, 30, pp.564~569 (2014)
- Leinfelder KF, "Indirect posterior composite resins", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 26, pp.495~503 (2005)
- Zhi L, "Comparative in vitro wear resistance of CAD", CAM composite resin and ceramic materials, 2016, pp.115, 199~202
- Oh WS, "Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear : a literature review", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.451~459 (2002)
- Giordano R, "Materials for chairside CAD", CAM-produced restorations, 2006, pp.137, 14~
- Isgrò G, "The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.465~473 (2003)
- Mörmann WH, "All-ceramic, chair-side computeraided design", computer-aided machining restorations, 2002, pp.46, 405~426
- Sajewicz E, "On evaluation of wear resistance of tooth enamel and dental materials", Wear, 260, pp.1256~1261 (2006)
- Quintas AF, "Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents : an in vitro evaluation", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.250~257 (2004)
- Syrek A, "Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling", J Dent, 38, pp.553~559 (2010)
- da Costa JB, "Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D", Oper Dent, 35, pp.324~329 (2010)
- Mou SH, "Influence of different convergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal adaptation of Cerec crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.248~255 (2002)
- Nakamura T, "Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD", CAM all-ceramic crowns, 2003, pp.16, 244~248
- Björn AL, "Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to periodontal bone level. II. Crowns", Odontol Revy, 21, pp.337~346 (1970)
- McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
- Daryakenari G, "Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness and wear of machinable ceramics and opposing dental enamel", Oper Dent, 44, pp.88~95 (2019)