Wear evaluation of CAD-CAM dental ceramic materials by chewing simulation
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To evaluate the wear of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) dental ceramic materials opposed by enamel as a function of increased chewing forces. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The enamel cusps of healthy human third molar teeth (n = 40) opposed by materials from CAD-CAM dental ceramic groups (n = 10), including Vita Enamic® (ENA), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN); GC Cerasmart® (CERA), a resin nanoceramic; Celtra® Duo (DUO), a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramic; and IPS e.max ZirCAD (ZIR), a polycrystalline zirconia, were exposed to chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles; 120 N load; 1 Hz frequency; 0.7 mm lateral and 2 mm vertical motion). The wear of both enamel cusps and materials was quantified using a 3D laser scanner, and the wear mechanisms were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results were analysed using Welch ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test (α = .05). RESULTS. ZIR showed lower volume loss (0.02 ± 0.01 mm3) than ENA, CERA and DUO (P = .001, P = .018 and P = .005, respectively). The wear of cusp/DUO [0.59 mm3 (0.50-1.63 mm3)] was higher than cusp/CERA [0.17 mm3 (0.04-0.41 mm3)] (P = .007). ZIR showed completely different wear mechanism in SEM. CONCLUSION. Composite structured materials such as PICN and ZLS ceramic exhibit more abrasive effect on opposing enamel due to their loss against wear, compared to uniform structured zirconia. The resin nanoceramic causes the lowest enamel wear thanks to its flexible nano-ceramic microstructure. While zirconia appears to be an enamel-friendly material in wear volume loss, it can cause microstructural defects of enamel.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate the wear of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) dental ceramic materials opposed by enamel as a function of increased chewing forces. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The enamel cusps of healthy human third molar teeth (n = 40) opposed by materials from CAD-CAM dental ceramic groups (n = 10), including Vita Enamic® (ENA), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN); GC Cerasmart® (CERA), a resin nanoceramic; Celtra® Duo (DUO), a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramic; and IPS e.max ZirCAD (ZIR), a polycrystalline zirconia, were exposed to chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles; 120 N load; 1 Hz frequency; 0.7 mm lateral and 2 mm vertical motion). The wear of both enamel cusps and materials was quantified using a 3D laser scanner, and the wear mechanisms were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results were analysed using Welch ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test (α = .05). RESULTS. ZIR showed lower volume loss (0.02 ± 0.01 mm3) than ENA, CERA and DUO (P = .001, P = .018 and P = .005, respectively). The wear of cusp/DUO [0.59 mm3 (0.50-1.63 mm3)] was higher than cusp/CERA [0.17 mm3 (0.04-0.41 mm3)] (P = .007). ZIR showed completely different wear mechanism in SEM. CONCLUSION. Composite structured materials such as PICN and ZLS ceramic exhibit more abrasive effect on opposing enamel due to their loss against wear, compared to uniform structured zirconia. The resin nanoceramic causes the lowest enamel wear thanks to its flexible nano-ceramic microstructure. While zirconia appears to be an enamel-friendly material in wear volume loss, it can cause microstructural defects of enamel.
참고문헌 (50)
- Datla SR, "Dental ceramics : part II-recent advances in dental ceramics", Am J Mater Eng Technol, 3, pp.19~26 (2015)
- van Noort R, "The future of dental devices is digital", Dent Mater, 28, pp.3~12 (2012)
- Grau A, "Reliability of wear measurements of CAD-CAM restorative materials after artificial aging in a mastication simulator", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 86, pp.185~190 (2018)
- Rekow D, "Near-surface damage-a persistent problem in crowns obtained by computer-aided design and manufacturing", Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 219, pp.233~243 (2005)
- Quinn GD, "On edge chipping testing and some personal perspectives on the state of the art of mechanical testing", Dent Mater, 31, pp.26~36 (2015)
- "Code on dental procedures and nomenclature (CDT)" (2017)[URL]
- Della Bona A, "Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material", Dent Mater, 30, pp.564~569 (2014)
- Elsaka SE, "Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic", Dent Mater, 32, pp.908~914 (2016)
- Manicone PF, "An overview of zirconia ceramics : basic properties and clinical applications", J Dent, 35, pp.819~826 (2007)
- Vardhaman S, "Wear behavior and microstructural characterization of translucent multilayer zirconia", Dent Mater, 36, pp.1407~1417 (2020)
- Höland W, "Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration", Expert Rev Med Devices, 5, pp.729~745 (2008)
- Zhou ZR, "Tribology of dental materials : a review", J Phys D Appl Phys, 41, pp.113001~ (2008)
- Xu Z, "A comparative study on the wear behavior of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network(PICN)material and tooth enamel", Dent Mater, 33, pp.1351~1361 (2017)
- Zheng J, "Impact wear behavior of human tooth enamel under simulated chewing conditions", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 62, pp.119~127 (2016)
- Zhang Z, "A comparative study of progressive wear of four dental monolithic, veneered glass-ceramics", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 74, pp.111~117 (2017)
- Shenoy A, "Dental ceramics : an update", J Conserv Dent, 13, pp.195~203 (2010)
- Barbour ME, "The role of erosion, abrasion and attrition in tooth wear", J Clin Dent, 17, pp.88~93 (2006)
- Oh WS, "Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear : a literature review", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.451~459 (2002)
- Nishigawa K, "Quantitative study of bite force during sleep associated bruxism", J Oral Rehabil, 28, pp.485~491 (2001)
- Fathy SM, "In-vitro wear of natural tooth surface opposed with zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic after accelerated ageing", Dent Mater, 34, pp.551~559 (2018)
- Esquivel-Upshaw JF, "Surface degradation of dental ceramics as a function of environmental pH", J Dent Res, 92, pp.467~471 (2013)
- Lobbezoo F, "Oral kinesiology. A new postgraduate programme in the Netherlands", J Oral Rehabil, 31, pp.192~198 (2004)
- Lobbezoo F, "Bruxism : its multiple causes and its effects on dental implants-an updated review", J Oral Rehabil, 33, pp.293~300 (2006)
- Heintze SD, "Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro", Dent Mater, 24, pp.433~449 (2008)
- Koc D, "Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements : a literature review", Eur J Dent, 4, pp.223~232 (2010)
- Cosme DC, "Bruxism and voluntary maximal bite force in young dentate adults", Int J Prosthodont, 18, pp.328~332 (2005)
- Kim MJ, "Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains", J Dent, 40, pp.979~988 (2012)
- 최재원, "Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(1), pp.43~52 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Lutz F, "Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps", J Dent Res, 71, pp.1525~1529 (1992)
- "ISO/TS 11405. Dentistry-Testing of adhesion to tooth structure" (2015)[URL]
- Rosentritt M, "Influence of substructure design and spacer settings on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns", J Dent, 37, pp.978~983 (2009)
- Henriques B, "Shear bond strength comparison between conventional porcelain fused to metal and new functionally graded dental restorations after thermal-mechanical cycling", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 13, pp.194~205 (2012)
- Gibbs CH, "Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission", J Prosthet Dent, 46, pp.443~449 (1981)
- Santos F, "Comparative study of the wear of the pair human teeth", Vita Enamic® vs commonly used dental ceramics through chewing simulation, 2018, pp.88, 251~260
- Heintze SD, "How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods", Dent Mater, 22, pp.712~734 (2006)
- Kaizer MR, "Wear Behavior of Graded Glass", Zirconia Crowns and Their Antagonists, 2019, pp.98, 437~442
- Zhang F, "High-translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics are wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly", Dent Mater, 35, pp.1776~1790 (2019)
- Borrero-Lopez O, "Wear of ceramic-based dental materials", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 92, pp.144~151 (2019)
- Mitov G, "Wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against natural enamel after different finishing procedures", Dent Mater, 28, pp.909~918 (2012)
- Zandparsa R, "Effect of different dental ceramic systems on the wear of human enamel : an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.230~237 (2016)
- Nakashima J, "In vitro wear of four ceramic materials and human enamel on enamel antagonist", Eur J Oral Sci, 124, pp.295~300 (2016)
- 정유석, "A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 2(3), pp.111~115 (2010), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Albashaireh ZS, "Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic", J Prosthet Dent, 104, pp.105~113 (2010)
- Lohbauer U, "Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years", Clin Oral Investig, 21, pp.1165~1172 (2017)
- Esquivel-Upshaw JF, "Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns", J Dent, 68, pp.19~27 (2018)
- Field J, "Quantifying and qualifying surface changes on dental hard tissues in vitro", J Dent, 38, pp.182~190 (2010)
- Leinfelder KF, "Indirect posterior composite resins", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 26, pp.495~503 (2005)[DOI]
- Furtado de Mendonca A, "Microstructural and mechanical characterization of CAD", CAM materials for monolithic dental restorations, 2019, pp.28, e587~e594
- Hugo Lambert, "Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD", CAM: State of the art, 2017, pp.9(6), 486~495[DOI]
- Sripetchdanond J, "Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1141~1150 (2014)