In vitro performance and fracture resistance of novel CAD/CAM ceramic molar crowns loaded on implants and human teeth
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To investigate the fatigue and fracture resistance of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic molar crowns on dental implants and human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Molar crowns (n=48; n=8/group) were fabricated of a lithium-disilicate-strengthened lithium aluminosilicate glass ceramic (N). Surfaces were polished (P) or glazed (G). Crowns were tested on human teeth (T) and implant-abutment analogues (I) simulating a chairside (C, crown bonded to abutment) or labside (L, screw channel) procedure for implant groups. Polished/glazed lithium disilicate (E) crowns (n=16) served as reference. Combined thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TC: 3000×5캜/3000×55캜; ML: 1.2×106 cycles, 50 N) with antagonistic human molars (groups T) and steatite spheres (groups I) was performed under a chewing simulator. TCML crowns were then analyzed for failures (optical microscopy, SEM) and fracture force was determined. Data were statistically analyzed (Kolmogorow-Smirnov, one-way-ANOVA, post-hoc Bonferroni, α=.05). RESULTS. All crowns survived TCML and showed small traces of wear. In human teeth groups, fracture forces of N crowns varied between 1214±293 N (NPT) and 1324±498 N (NGT), differing significantly (P≤.003) from the polished reference EPT (2044±302 N). Fracture forces in implant groups varied between 934±154 N (NGI_L) and 1782±153 N (NPI_C), providing higher values for the respective chairside crowns. Differences between polishing and glazing were not significant (P≥.066) between crowns of identical materials and abutment support. CONCLUSION. Fracture resistance was influenced by the ceramic material, and partly by the tooth or implant situation and the clinical procedure (chairside/labside). Type of surface finish (polishing/glazing) had no significant influence. Clinical survival of the new glass ceramic may be comparable to lithium disilicate.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To investigate the fatigue and fracture resistance of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic molar crowns on dental implants and human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Molar crowns (n=48; n=8/group) were fabricated of a lithium-disilicate-strengthened lithium aluminosilicate glass ceramic (N). Surfaces were polished (P) or glazed (G). Crowns were tested on human teeth (T) and implant-abutment analogues (I) simulating a chairside (C, crown bonded to abutment) or labside (L, screw channel) procedure for implant groups. Polished/glazed lithium disilicate (E) crowns (n=16) served as reference. Combined thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TC: 3000×5캜/3000×55캜; ML: 1.2×106 cycles, 50 N) with antagonistic human molars (groups T) and steatite spheres (groups I) was performed under a chewing simulator. TCML crowns were then analyzed for failures (optical microscopy, SEM) and fracture force was determined. Data were statistically analyzed (Kolmogorow-Smirnov, one-way-ANOVA, post-hoc Bonferroni, α=.05). RESULTS. All crowns survived TCML and showed small traces of wear. In human teeth groups, fracture forces of N crowns varied between 1214±293 N (NPT) and 1324±498 N (NGT), differing significantly (P≤.003) from the polished reference EPT (2044±302 N). Fracture forces in implant groups varied between 934±154 N (NGI_L) and 1782±153 N (NPI_C), providing higher values for the respective chairside crowns. Differences between polishing and glazing were not significant (P≥.066) between crowns of identical materials and abutment support. CONCLUSION. Fracture resistance was influenced by the ceramic material, and partly by the tooth or implant situation and the clinical procedure (chairside/labside). Type of surface finish (polishing/glazing) had no significant influence. Clinical survival of the new glass ceramic may be comparable to lithium disilicate.
참고문헌 (50)
- Rauch A, "Chair-side generated posterior monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: clinical survival after 6 years", Clin Oral Investig, 21, pp.2083~2089 (2017)[DOI]
- Gehrt M, "Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.275~284 (2013)[DOI]
- Toman M, "Clinical evaluation of 121 lithium disilicate all-ceramic crowns up to 9 years", Quintessence Int, 46, pp.189~197 (2015)
- Pieger S, "Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.22~30 (2014)[DOI]
- Cacaci C, "Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results", Clin Oral Investig, 21, pp.1953~1959 (2017)[DOI]
- Dogan S, "Prospective cohort clinical study assessing the 5-year survival and success of anterior maxillary zirconia-based crowns with customized zirconia copings", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.226~232 (2017)[DOI]
- Nejatidanesh F, "Clinical outcomes of zirconia-based implant- and tooth-supported single crowns", Clin Oral Investig, 20, pp.169~178 (2016)[DOI]
- Wasiluk G, "Incidence of undetected cement on CAD", CAM monolithic zirconia crowns and customized CAD, Clin Oral Implants Res, pp.2017, 28[DOI]
- Preis V, "In-vitro fatigue and fracture testing of CAD", CAM-materials in implant-supported molar crowns, 2017, pp.33, 427~433
- Rosentritt M, "In-vitro performance of CAD", CAM-fabricated implant-supported temporary crowns, 2017, pp.21, 2581~2587
- Rosentritt M, "In vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD", CAMfabricated implant supported molar crowns, 2017, pp.21, 1213~1219
- Zarone F, "Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis", Dent Mater, 23, pp.296~301 (2007)[DOI]
- Al-Omari WM, "Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns", J Prosthodont, 19, pp.263~273 (2010)[DOI]
- Pjetursson BE, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.22~38 (2012)
- Romeo E, "Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.247~259 (2004)
- Jung RE, "A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.119~130 (2008)[DOI]
- Zimmermann M, "Indirect zirconiareinforced lithium silicate ceramic CAD", CAM restorations: Preliminary clinical results after 12 months, 2017, pp.48, 19~25
- Dirxen C, "Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material", Open Dent J, 7, pp.118~122 (2013)[DOI]
- Preis V, "Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD", CAM-fabricated ZLS molar crowns, 2015, pp.31, 1363~1369
- Schwindling FS, "Fracture resistance of glazed, full-contour ZLS incisor crowns", J Prosthodont Res, 61, pp.344~349 (2017)[DOI]
- Belli R, "Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization", Dent Mater, 33, pp.84~98 (2017)[DOI]
- Wendler M, "Chairside CAD", CAM materials. Part 2: Flexural strength testing, 2017, pp.33, 99~109
- Ramos Nde C, "Microstructure characterization and SCG of newly engineered dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 32, pp.870~878 (2016)[DOI]
- Scharnagl P, "Simulation of physiological tooth mobility in in-vitro stress examination of dental restorations in the masticator", J Dent Res, 77, pp.1260~ (1998)
- Rosentritt M, "Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of allceramic fixed-partial dentures", Dent Mater, 22, pp.176~182 (2006)[DOI]
- Rosentritt M, "Influence of resilient support of abutment teeth on fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study", Int J Prosthodont, 24, pp.465~468 (2011)
- Rosentritt M, "Approach for valuating the influence of laboratory simulation", Dent Mater, 25, pp.348~352 (2009)[DOI]
- Rosentritt M, "Approach for valuating the significance of laboratory simulation", J Dent, 36, pp.1048~1053 (2008)[DOI]
- Fasbinder DJ, "A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD", CAM crowns: a two-year report, 2010, pp.141, 10S~14S
- Reich S, "Chair-side generated posterior lithium disilicate crowns after 4 years", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.1765~1772 (2013)[DOI]
- Yang R, "A comparison of the fracture resistance of three machinable ceramics after thermal and mechanical fatigue", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.878~885 (2014)[DOI]
- Zesewitz TF, "Fracture resistance of a selection of full-contour all-ceramic crowns: an in vitro study", Int J Prosthodont, 27, pp.264~266 (2014)[DOI]
- Carvalho AO, "Fatigue resistance of CAD", CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process, 2014, pp.111, 310~317
- Seydler B, "In vitro fracture load of monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic molar crowns with different wall thicknesses", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.1165~1171 (2014)[DOI]
- Varga S, "Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with normal occlusion", Eur J Orthod, 33, pp.427~433 (2011)[DOI]
- Chavali R, "Machinability of CADCAM materials", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.194~199 (2017)[DOI]
- Weyhrauch M, "Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns on titanium implant abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 31, pp.304~309 (2016)
- Salazar Marocho SM, "Mechanical strength and subcritical crack growth under wet cyclic loading of glass-infiltrated dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 26, pp.483~490 (2010)[DOI]
- Mair LH, "Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop", J Dent, 24, pp.141~148 (1996)[DOI]
- Kim JW, "Sliding contact fatigue damage in layered ceramic structures", J Dent Res, 86, pp.1046~1050 (2007)[DOI]
- Preis V, "Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 10, pp.13~22 (2012)[DOI]
- Aurelio IL, "Extended glaze firing on ceramics for hard machining: Crack healing, residual stresses, optical and microstructural aspects", Dent Mater, 33, pp.226~240 (2017)[DOI]
- Preis V, "Cycle-dependent in vitro wear performance of dental ceramics after clinical surface treatments", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 53, pp.49~58 (2016)[DOI]
- Hussien AN, "Effect of screw-access channels on the fracture resistance of 3 types of ceramic implant-supported crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.214~220 (2016)[DOI]
- Rosentritt M, "In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant", abutment systems for anterior application, 2014, pp.42, 1019~1026
- Preis V, "In vitro performance of two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application", Dent Mater, 32, pp.765~774 (2016)[DOI]
- de Kok P, "Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.59~66 (2015)[DOI]
- Pjetursson BE, "Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.185~193 (2005)[DOI]
- Kammermeier A, "In vitro performance of one- and two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application", J Dent, 53, pp.94~101 (2016)[DOI]
- Ferrario VF, "Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography", J Dent, 32, pp.451~457 (2004)[DOI]
