How adjustment could affect internal and marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM crowns made with different materials
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. Recently introduced hybrid and reinforced glass ceramic computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials have been used for full-coverage restorations. However; the effect of adjustment and type of materials on internal and marginal adaptation are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the marginal and internal adaptations of crowns made of three different CAD/CAM materials before and after adjustment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One acrylic resin maxillary first molar was prepared and served as the master die. Thirty-six restorations were fabricated using CAD/CAM system (CEREC Omnicam, MCXL) with three materials including lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Suprinity), and hybrid ceramic (Enamic). Internal and marginal adaptations were evaluated with the reference point matching technique before and after adjustment. The data were analyzed using mixed ANOVA considering α=.05 as the significance level. RESULTS. The effect of adjustment and its interaction with the restoration material were significant for marginal, absolute marginal, and occlusal discrepancies (P<.05). Before adjustment, Suprinity had lower marginal discrepancies than IPS e.max CAD (P=.18) and Enamic (P=.021); though no significant differences existed after adjustment. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, crowns fabricated from IPS e.max CAD and Suprinity resulted in slightly better adaptation compared with Enamic crowns before adjustment. However, marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies were similar among all materials after the adjustment.
Abstract
PURPOSE. Recently introduced hybrid and reinforced glass ceramic computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials have been used for full-coverage restorations. However; the effect of adjustment and type of materials on internal and marginal adaptation are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the marginal and internal adaptations of crowns made of three different CAD/CAM materials before and after adjustment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One acrylic resin maxillary first molar was prepared and served as the master die. Thirty-six restorations were fabricated using CAD/CAM system (CEREC Omnicam, MCXL) with three materials including lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Suprinity), and hybrid ceramic (Enamic). Internal and marginal adaptations were evaluated with the reference point matching technique before and after adjustment. The data were analyzed using mixed ANOVA considering α=.05 as the significance level. RESULTS. The effect of adjustment and its interaction with the restoration material were significant for marginal, absolute marginal, and occlusal discrepancies (P<.05). Before adjustment, Suprinity had lower marginal discrepancies than IPS e.max CAD (P=.18) and Enamic (P=.021); though no significant differences existed after adjustment. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, crowns fabricated from IPS e.max CAD and Suprinity resulted in slightly better adaptation compared with Enamic crowns before adjustment. However, marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies were similar among all materials after the adjustment.
참고문헌 (38)
- Dolan TA, "Risk indicators of edentulism, partial tooth loss and prosthetic status among black and white middle-aged and older adults", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 29, pp.329~340 (2001)
- Volpato CÂ, "Ceramic Materials", pp.155~174 (2010), InTech
- Felton DA, "Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.357~364 (1991)
- Jacobs MS, "An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.436~442 (1991)
- Conrad HJ, "Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations : a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.389~404 (2007)
- Gracis S, "A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.227~235 (2015)
- Tysowsky G, "The science behind lithium disilicate: Today’s surprisingly versatile, esthetic & durable metal-free alternative", Oral Health, 99, pp.93~97 (2009)
- Gehrt M, "Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.275~284 (2013)
- Fasbinder DJ, "A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD", CAM crowns : a two-year report, 2010, pp.141, 10S~4S
- Pieger S, "Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses : a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.22~30 (2014)
- Denry I, "Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry", J Dent Res, 93, pp.1235~1242 (2014)
- Belli R, "Chairside CAD", CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization, 2017, pp.33, 84~98
- Elsaka SE, "Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic", Dent Mater, 32, pp.908~914 (2016)
- Goujat A, "Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4CAD-CAM block materials", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.384~389 (2018)
- He LH, "A novel polymer infiltrated ceramic dental material", Dent Mater, 27, pp.527~534 (2011)
- Ruse ND, "Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD", CAM applications, 2014, pp.93, 1232~1234
- Ramos Nde C, "Microstructure characterization and SCG of newly engineered dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 32, pp.870~878 (2016)
- Bottino MA, "The influence of cervical finish line, internal relief, and cement type on the cervical adaptation of metal crowns", Quintessence Int, 38, pp.e425~e432 (2007)
- Limkangwalmongkol P, "Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns", J Prosthodont, 18, pp.162~166 (2009)
- Johnson R, "Marginal gap of milled versus cast gold restorations", J Prosthodont, 26, pp.56~63 (2017)
- Tabata LF, "Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM composite resin and ceramic crowns before and after internal adjustment", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.500~505 (2020)
- Azarbal A, "Marginal fit comparison of CAD", CAM crowns milled from two different materials, 2018, pp.27, 421~428
- Memari Y, "Marginal adaptation of CAD", CAM all-ceramic crowns made by different impression methods : A literature review, 2019, pp.28, e536~e544
- Miyazaki T, "A review of dental CAD", CAM : current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience, 2009, pp.28, 44~56
- McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
- Eldafrawy M, "A functionally graded PICN material for biomimetic CAD-CAM blocks", J Dent Res, 97, pp.1324~1330 (2018)
- Chavali R, "Machinability of CADCAM materials", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.194~199 (2017)
- Awada A, "Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2015, pp.114, 587~593
- Chaysuwan D, "Machinable glass-ceramics forming as a restorative dental material", Dent Mater J, 30, pp.358~367 (2011)
- Boccaccini A, "Machinability and brittleness of glass-ceramics", J Mater Proc Tech, 65, pp.302~304 (1997)
- Holmes JR, "Considerations in measurement of marginal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.405~408 (1989)
- May LG, "Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD", CAM ceramic crowns : multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing, 2012, pp.28, e99~e109
- Zeltner M, "Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.354~362 (2017)
- Yildirim G, "Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of hybrid and nanoceramic systems with microcomputed tomography : An in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.200~207 (2017)
- Curran P, "Grinding damage assessment for CAD-CAM restorative materials", Dent Mater, 33, pp.294~308 (2017)
- Ludovichetti FS, "Effect of grinding and polishing on the roughness and fracture resistance of cemented CAD-CAM monolithic materials submitted to mechanical aging", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.866.e1~866.e8 (2019)
- Coldea A, "Damage tolerance of indirect restorative materials(including PICN)after simulated bur adjustments", Dent Mater, 31, pp.684~694 (2015)
- 송태진, "Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD", CAM systems, 2013, pp.5(3), 219~225[DOI]
