본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

How adjustment could affect internal and marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM crowns made with different materials

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. Recently introduced hybrid and reinforced glass ceramic computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials have been used for full-coverage restorations. However; the effect of adjustment and type of materials on internal and marginal adaptation are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the marginal and internal adaptations of crowns made of three different CAD/CAM materials before and after adjustment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One acrylic resin maxillary first molar was prepared and served as the master die. Thirty-six restorations were fabricated using CAD/CAM system (CEREC Omnicam, MCXL) with three materials including lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Suprinity), and hybrid ceramic (Enamic). Internal and marginal adaptations were evaluated with the reference point matching technique before and after adjustment. The data were analyzed using mixed ANOVA considering α=.05 as the significance level. RESULTS. The effect of adjustment and its interaction with the restoration material were significant for marginal, absolute marginal, and occlusal discrepancies (P<.05). Before adjustment, Suprinity had lower marginal discrepancies than IPS e.max CAD (P=.18) and Enamic (P=.021); though no significant differences existed after adjustment. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, crowns fabricated from IPS e.max CAD and Suprinity resulted in slightly better adaptation compared with Enamic crowns before adjustment. However, marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies were similar among all materials after the adjustment.

Abstract

PURPOSE. Recently introduced hybrid and reinforced glass ceramic computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials have been used for full-coverage restorations. However; the effect of adjustment and type of materials on internal and marginal adaptation are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the marginal and internal adaptations of crowns made of three different CAD/CAM materials before and after adjustment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One acrylic resin maxillary first molar was prepared and served as the master die. Thirty-six restorations were fabricated using CAD/CAM system (CEREC Omnicam, MCXL) with three materials including lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Suprinity), and hybrid ceramic (Enamic). Internal and marginal adaptations were evaluated with the reference point matching technique before and after adjustment. The data were analyzed using mixed ANOVA considering α=.05 as the significance level. RESULTS. The effect of adjustment and its interaction with the restoration material were significant for marginal, absolute marginal, and occlusal discrepancies (P<.05). Before adjustment, Suprinity had lower marginal discrepancies than IPS e.max CAD (P=.18) and Enamic (P=.021); though no significant differences existed after adjustment. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, crowns fabricated from IPS e.max CAD and Suprinity resulted in slightly better adaptation compared with Enamic crowns before adjustment. However, marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies were similar among all materials after the adjustment.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Dolan TA, "Risk indicators of edentulism, partial tooth loss and prosthetic status among black and white middle-aged and older adults", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 29, pp.329~340 (2001)
  2. Volpato CÂ, "Ceramic Materials", pp.155~174 (2010), InTech
  3. Felton DA, "Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.357~364 (1991)
  4. Jacobs MS, "An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.436~442 (1991)
  5. Conrad HJ, "Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations : a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.389~404 (2007)
  6. Gracis S, "A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.227~235 (2015)
  7. Tysowsky G, "The science behind lithium disilicate: Today’s surprisingly versatile, esthetic & durable metal-free alternative", Oral Health, 99, pp.93~97 (2009)
  8. Gehrt M, "Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.275~284 (2013)
  9. Fasbinder DJ, "A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD", CAM crowns : a two-year report, 2010, pp.141, 10S~4S
  10. Pieger S, "Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses : a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.22~30 (2014)
  11. Denry I, "Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry", J Dent Res, 93, pp.1235~1242 (2014)
  12. Belli R, "Chairside CAD", CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization, 2017, pp.33, 84~98
  13. Elsaka SE, "Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic", Dent Mater, 32, pp.908~914 (2016)
  14. Goujat A, "Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4CAD-CAM block materials", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.384~389 (2018)
  15. He LH, "A novel polymer infiltrated ceramic dental material", Dent Mater, 27, pp.527~534 (2011)
  16. Ruse ND, "Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD", CAM applications, 2014, pp.93, 1232~1234
  17. Ramos Nde C, "Microstructure characterization and SCG of newly engineered dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 32, pp.870~878 (2016)
  18. Bottino MA, "The influence of cervical finish line, internal relief, and cement type on the cervical adaptation of metal crowns", Quintessence Int, 38, pp.e425~e432 (2007)
  19. Limkangwalmongkol P, "Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns", J Prosthodont, 18, pp.162~166 (2009)
  20. Johnson R, "Marginal gap of milled versus cast gold restorations", J Prosthodont, 26, pp.56~63 (2017)
  21. Tabata LF, "Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM composite resin and ceramic crowns before and after internal adjustment", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.500~505 (2020)
  22. Azarbal A, "Marginal fit comparison of CAD", CAM crowns milled from two different materials, 2018, pp.27, 421~428
  23. Memari Y, "Marginal adaptation of CAD", CAM all-ceramic crowns made by different impression methods : A literature review, 2019, pp.28, e536~e544
  24. Miyazaki T, "A review of dental CAD", CAM : current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience, 2009, pp.28, 44~56
  25. McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
  26. Eldafrawy M, "A functionally graded PICN material for biomimetic CAD-CAM blocks", J Dent Res, 97, pp.1324~1330 (2018)
  27. Chavali R, "Machinability of CADCAM materials", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.194~199 (2017)
  28. Awada A, "Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2015, pp.114, 587~593
  29. Chaysuwan D, "Machinable glass-ceramics forming as a restorative dental material", Dent Mater J, 30, pp.358~367 (2011)
  30. Boccaccini A, "Machinability and brittleness of glass-ceramics", J Mater Proc Tech, 65, pp.302~304 (1997)
  31. Holmes JR, "Considerations in measurement of marginal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.405~408 (1989)
  32. May LG, "Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD", CAM ceramic crowns : multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing, 2012, pp.28, e99~e109
  33. Zeltner M, "Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.354~362 (2017)
  34. Yildirim G, "Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of hybrid and nanoceramic systems with microcomputed tomography : An in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.200~207 (2017)
  35. Curran P, "Grinding damage assessment for CAD-CAM restorative materials", Dent Mater, 33, pp.294~308 (2017)
  36. Ludovichetti FS, "Effect of grinding and polishing on the roughness and fracture resistance of cemented CAD-CAM monolithic materials submitted to mechanical aging", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.866.e1~866.e8 (2019)
  37. Coldea A, "Damage tolerance of indirect restorative materials(including PICN)after simulated bur adjustments", Dent Mater, 31, pp.684~694 (2015)
  38. 송태진, "Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD", CAM systems, 2013, pp.5(3), 219~225[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Evaluation of marginal fit of 2 CAD-CAM anatomic contour zirconia crown systems and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown박상원, 박지희, 오계정, 윤귀덕, 임현필, 지민경대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2015 · 제7권 제4호Comparison of the fit accuracy of zirconia-based prostheses generated by two CAD/CAM systems조진현, 하석준대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2016 · 제8권 제6호Ceramic molar crown reproducibility by digital workflow manufacturing: An in vitro study김웅철, 김지환, 김총명, 박진영, 정일도대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제4호Comparison of three-dimensional digital technique with twodimensional replica method for measuring marginal and internal fit of full coverage restorationsMahya Hasanzade, Marzieh Alikhasi, Naeime Moslemian, Soudabeh Koulivand대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2020 · 제12권 제3호Marginal and internal fit of nano-composite CAD/CAM restorations박소현, 백승호, 신유진, 유연지, 조병훈대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2016 · 제41권 제1호Effect of anatomic, semi-anatomic and non-anatomic occlusal surface tooth preparations on the adaptation of zirconia copingsMohammed Jameel Hefne, Syed Rashid Habib, Waleed Asiri대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2014 · 제6권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)