본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중세 예수회 선교사들에 의한 일본어 교육 -조선 사역원의 일본어교육과 비교하여-

A study of Japanese education by the missionaries in the middle ancient Japan: Compared with the Japanese education conducted by Sayeokwon of Joseon

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper examines several aspects of Japanese language education and educational perspectives that were conducted by Jesuit missionaries and Joāo Rodrigues one of the missionaries, who arrived in Japan in the 16th century. Additionally we looked at the similarities and the differences that the Japanese education of missionaries had compared to that of Sayeokwon, the foreign language interpreter training institution of Joseon dynasty. The findings are as follows. First, while the Correggio, the missionary institution in Japan, focused on teaching Japanese conversational skills necessary for the missionary works and the ideal priest training, the Sayeokwon had its focus on fostering the interpreter to strengthen the relationship with neighboring Japan. Second, in the Correggio, Portuguese and Roman letters were used to compile the textbooks instead of Japanese letters. In contrast, the Sayeokwon used Japanese characters and styles to make the textbooks and readings from the beginning. Third, in the introductory stage of Correggio education, ‘listening’ and ‘speaking’ of Japanese language were emphasized over 'reading' and 'writing' which were considered to be the advanced stage of the language learning. Contrarily, the Sayeokwon mainly focused on ‘reading’ and ‘writing’ of Japanese language. It was only after the Imjin War, where the textbooks of Sayeokwon reflected the importance of ‘listening’ and ‘speaking’ of Japanese language.

Abstract

This paper examines several aspects of Japanese language education and educational perspectives that were conducted by Jesuit missionaries and Joāo Rodrigues one of the missionaries, who arrived in Japan in the 16th century. Additionally we looked at the similarities and the differences that the Japanese education of missionaries had compared to that of Sayeokwon, the foreign language interpreter training institution of Joseon dynasty. The findings are as follows. First, while the Correggio, the missionary institution in Japan, focused on teaching Japanese conversational skills necessary for the missionary works and the ideal priest training, the Sayeokwon had its focus on fostering the interpreter to strengthen the relationship with neighboring Japan. Second, in the Correggio, Portuguese and Roman letters were used to compile the textbooks instead of Japanese letters. In contrast, the Sayeokwon used Japanese characters and styles to make the textbooks and readings from the beginning. Third, in the introductory stage of Correggio education, ‘listening’ and ‘speaking’ of Japanese language were emphasized over 'reading' and 'writing' which were considered to be the advanced stage of the language learning. Contrarily, the Sayeokwon mainly focused on ‘reading’ and ‘writing’ of Japanese language. It was only after the Imjin War, where the textbooks of Sayeokwon reflected the importance of ‘listening’ and ‘speaking’ of Japanese language.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 권동현, "『첩해신어』에 나타난 オ단장음에 대해서", 일본연구, (40), pp.311~330 (2009), 일본연구소[DOI]
  2. 김영옥, "왜학서에 나타난 チ·ツ 음에 대하여", 일본어교육연구, (39), pp.39~52 (2017), 한국일어교육학회[DOI]
  3. 김영옥, "왜학서에 나타난 オ단 장음에 대하여", 언어정보, (26), pp.33~50 (2018), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  4. 김영옥, "왜학서에 나타난 ます형에 대하여", 언어정보, (28), pp.25~39 (2019), 언어정보연구소
  5. 김용균, "『운포이로하슈』(運?色葉集)에 보이는 2단활용의1단화현상에 대한 일고찰 -제(諸) 고사전(古?典) 및 기리시탄(キリシタン)사전과 비교를 중심으로-", 일본연구, (2), pp.133~150 (2003), 글로벌일본연구원
  6. 이영숙, "최고의 권력자를 지칭하는 어휘의 史的 考察 -중세 기리시탄 문헌을 중심으로-", 일본언어문화, (13), pp.189~205 (2008), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
  7. 유상용, "形式語「ギ(儀․義)」의 變遷 - 中世口語外國資料를 中心으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(38), pp.371~387 (2014), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  8. 이동욱, "司譯院の日本語學習書", 日本學硏究, 15, pp.117~146 (2004), 일본연구소
  9. 李淑姬, "中世日本語の因由形式ニヨッテの階層", 일본학보, (63), pp.129~146 (2005), 한국일본학회
  10. 이영숙, "기리시탄(吉利支丹)자료의「戀」와「愛」의 고찰:「大切」와의 관련성을 중심으로", 일본언어문화, 4, pp.54~71 (2004)
  11. 이영숙, "語義変化와 類義語의 고찰 ─中世 기리시탄 資料의 「懐かし」 「恋し」 「思ふ」를 중심으로─", 日本學硏究, 51, pp.333~352 (2017), 일본연구소
  12. 정광, "조선시대의 외국어교육" (2015), 김영사(e-book)
  13. 鄭炫赫, "キリシタン資料に 現れた 用言の ウ音便の 一考察 : 「天草版平家物語」を 中心資料として", 석사, 일본어, pp.1995
  14. 정현혁, "キリシタン版國字本の濁音表記について", 일어일문학연구, 48(2), pp.21~36 (2004), 한국일어일문학회
  15. 정현혁, "キリシタン版『落葉集』の定訓の漢字について", 일어일문학연구, 71(1), pp.297~319 (2009), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  16. 정현혁, "キリシタン版からみるキリシタンの単語学習-天草版平家物語;伊曽保物語のやわらげを手がかりに-", 일어일문학연구, 75(1), pp.191~208 (2010), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  17. 정현혁, "吉利支丹心得書の仮名の用字法", 일본어문학, (64), pp.131~150 (2014), 일본어문학회[DOI]
  18. 조래철, "日本語學習書としての捷解新語:ハングル音注における特殊音素表記を中心に", 외국어교육연구, 21(1), pp.151~165 (2007), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
  19. 최현필, "教師と研究者間の協働による授業改善の試み: 大学の日本語授業の‘制約’を乗り越えて", 외국어교육연구, 26(2), pp.191~212 (2012), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
  20. 나카자와 노리코, "日本語教育における読解教材-キリシタン資料を中心に-", 한국일본어교육학회 학술발표문집, pp.26~34 (2016)
  21. 新井トシ, "きりしたん版国字本の印行について4", ビブリア天理圖書館報, 12, pp.35~40 (1958)
  22. 池上岑夫, "ロドリゲス日本語小文典<上><下>" (1993), 岩波文庫
  23. 小鹿原敏夫, "ロドリゲス日本大文典の研究" (2015), 和泉選書
  24. 熊沢精次, "講座日本語と日本語教育(15) 日本語教育の歴史", pp.47~63 (1991), 明治書院
  25. 小島幸枝, "キリシタン文献の国語学研究" (1994), 武蔵野書院
  26. 新村出, "新村出全集 第1巻" (1971), 筑摩書房
  27. 高見澤孟, "日本語教育史(2)西洋人と日本語の出会い", 学苑, 771, pp.1~10 (2005), 昭和女子大学
  28. 土井忠生, "邦訳日葡辞書" (1995), 岩波書店
  29. 土井忠生訳註, "ロドリゲス日本大文典" (1955), 三省堂出版
  30. 中沢紀子, "日本語教科書としての『天草板平家物語』: 格成分・格助詞を中心に", 帝京大学文学部紀要日本文化学, 48, pp.108~100 (2017)
  31. 橋本進吉, "橋本進吉著作集" (1983), 岩波書店
  32. 福島邦道, "キリシタン資料と国語研究", pp.1~343 (1973), 笠間書院
  33. 福島邦道, "キリシタンの日本語学習", 国語学, 161, pp.120~122 (1990)
  34. 宮武利江, "キリシタン資料に見る日本語教育 : 規範意識と教育理念", 文教大学国文, 48, pp.19~29 (2019)
  35. 杉本つとむ, "杉本つとむ著作集10", pp.39~51 (1999), 八坂書房

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)