본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개화기 飜譯官 양성을 위한 외국어 교육과 그 문제점

Education and Selection of Interpreters in the Early Modern Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Before opening the port, Joseon Dynasty had been engaged in the international relations based on the Ye(禮) of Sadaegyorin(事大交隣) in the top-down hierarchical structure. At this time, the international relations were approached at the level of the Ye and under the direction of the Ministry of Rites(禮曹), and the foreign business was performed in the form of assistances from the Seungmunwon(承文院) which was in charge of the diplomatic documentation and the Sayeogwon(司譯院) which was responsible for communicating and processing works. Official interpreters of Chinese language(漢語), Japanese langugage(日語), Jurchen language and Mongolian language belong to the Sayeogwon and it was solely responsible for the language communication and exchange. But after the port opening, the foreign affair system of Joseon experienced a big change. Western powers forced Joseon to adopt their international law and diplomacy order by their superior strength and this meant that it should be converted into a modern diplomacy order which is based on the international law(萬國公法). Joseon was trying to respond to this by accepting the western diplomacy system and being equipped with a professional bureaucracy dedicated to diplomacy affairs. Therefore, while taking the diplomacy affair as an independent area by separating from the Ministry of Rites, they established the diplomatic department and expanded its diplomacy target including western countries. In this sprocess, Tongrigimuamun(統理機務衙門) had been established as a diplomacy department which was responsible for the treaties and the trade business with foreign countries and it had been changed to Tongrigyoseoptongsangsamuamun(統理交涉通商事務衙門), Oimuamun(外務衙門) after the Gabo reform period, Oibu(外部), etc. Meanwhile, the need for professional business organization which should serve on the modern diplomacy system had led to the birth of official interpreters. They appeared on record since 1885. While being responsible for interpreting and translation belonging to the diplomacy department, they mainly majored in western languages such as English, Russian and etc. While they were mainly placed in maritime customs(海關) and missions abroad(公館), since the Gabo reform, they were responsible for the diplomacy business work belonging to the central department. In order to successfully establish a modern diplomacy system, Joseon tried to establish the new training and selection process for the human resource development. For the official interpreter, the government educational institutions were established and the foreign language education was carried out. The foreign language which was initially limited to English expanded to Japanese and Chinese as well as French, German and Russian. Along with these institutional changes, the knowledge, which the interpreter had to equip with, such as history, geography, law, economics, science, gymnastics, etc. started to be trained. In that selection as well, graduates from good foreign language schools were primarily to be appointed. The effort of Joseon trying to establish the modern diplomacy system as such was carried out independently and autonomously. However, the foreign intervention trying to plant their influence through the language education during the education and selection of the official interpreter also can not be overlooked. Western countries were aggressive in their language education for their own positioning and interest in Joseon. Therefore, regarding the establishment of the language school after Dongmunhak(同文學) or Yukyounggongwon(育英公院), there were always aggressive proposals by Western countries for the establishment of educational facilities and these led to proposals on teacher recommendations and educational contents. Therefore, even the education philosophy of the country was injected in each language school. And also, each foreign legations(公使館) influenced even in the selection of the interpreter. While Joseon government demanded interpreters to work strictly for the national interest, these factors shown in the education and employment of interpreters also had the side effects such as sometimes causing the confusion in the identity of interpreters.

Abstract

Before opening the port, Joseon Dynasty had been engaged in the international relations based on the Ye(禮) of Sadaegyorin(事大交隣) in the top-down hierarchical structure. At this time, the international relations were approached at the level of the Ye and under the direction of the Ministry of Rites(禮曹), and the foreign business was performed in the form of assistances from the Seungmunwon(承文院) which was in charge of the diplomatic documentation and the Sayeogwon(司譯院) which was responsible for communicating and processing works. Official interpreters of Chinese language(漢語), Japanese langugage(日語), Jurchen language and Mongolian language belong to the Sayeogwon and it was solely responsible for the language communication and exchange. But after the port opening, the foreign affair system of Joseon experienced a big change. Western powers forced Joseon to adopt their international law and diplomacy order by their superior strength and this meant that it should be converted into a modern diplomacy order which is based on the international law(萬國公法). Joseon was trying to respond to this by accepting the western diplomacy system and being equipped with a professional bureaucracy dedicated to diplomacy affairs. Therefore, while taking the diplomacy affair as an independent area by separating from the Ministry of Rites, they established the diplomatic department and expanded its diplomacy target including western countries. In this sprocess, Tongrigimuamun(統理機務衙門) had been established as a diplomacy department which was responsible for the treaties and the trade business with foreign countries and it had been changed to Tongrigyoseoptongsangsamuamun(統理交涉通商事務衙門), Oimuamun(外務衙門) after the Gabo reform period, Oibu(外部), etc. Meanwhile, the need for professional business organization which should serve on the modern diplomacy system had led to the birth of official interpreters. They appeared on record since 1885. While being responsible for interpreting and translation belonging to the diplomacy department, they mainly majored in western languages such as English, Russian and etc. While they were mainly placed in maritime customs(海關) and missions abroad(公館), since the Gabo reform, they were responsible for the diplomacy business work belonging to the central department. In order to successfully establish a modern diplomacy system, Joseon tried to establish the new training and selection process for the human resource development. For the official interpreter, the government educational institutions were established and the foreign language education was carried out. The foreign language which was initially limited to English expanded to Japanese and Chinese as well as French, German and Russian. Along with these institutional changes, the knowledge, which the interpreter had to equip with, such as history, geography, law, economics, science, gymnastics, etc. started to be trained. In that selection as well, graduates from good foreign language schools were primarily to be appointed. The effort of Joseon trying to establish the modern diplomacy system as such was carried out independently and autonomously. However, the foreign intervention trying to plant their influence through the language education during the education and selection of the official interpreter also can not be overlooked. Western countries were aggressive in their language education for their own positioning and interest in Joseon. Therefore, regarding the establishment of the language school after Dongmunhak(同文學) or Yukyounggongwon(育英公院), there were always aggressive proposals by Western countries for the establishment of educational facilities and these led to proposals on teacher recommendations and educational contents. Therefore, even the education philosophy of the country was injected in each language school. And also, each foreign legations(公使館) influenced even in the selection of the interpreter. While Joseon government demanded interpreters to work strictly for the national interest, these factors shown in the education and employment of interpreters also had the side effects such as sometimes causing the confusion in the identity of interpreters.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. "高宗實錄", ~
  2. "承政院日記", ~
  3. "大韓帝國官員履歷書", ~
  4. "譯科榜目", ~
  5. "漢城旬報", ~
  6. "漢城週報", ~
  7. "제국신문", ~
  8. "皇城新聞", ~
  9. "독립신문", ~
  10. "駐韓日本公使館記錄", ~
  11. "프랑스외무부문서", ~
  12. G. W. 길모어, "서울풍물지" (1999), 집문당
  13. H. B. 헐버트, "대한제국멸망사" (2006), 집문당
  14. T. E. Hallifax, "후소노하나(扶桑の花)" (1890)
  15. W. F. 샌즈, "조선의 마지막 날" (1986), 미완
  16. 김종헌, "러시아문서 번역집Ⅰ" (2008), 선인
  17. 까를로 로제티, "꼬레아 꼬레아니" (1996), 숲과나무
  18. 바츨라프 세로세프스키, "코레야 1903년 가을" (2006), 개마고원
  19. 에밀 부르다레, "대한제국 최후의 숨결" (2009), 글항아리
  20. 홍순호, "20세기 전반기 한국사회의 연구" (1999), 백산자료원
  21. 小坂貞雄, "外人の觀たる朝鮮外交秘話" (1934), 朝鮮外交秘話出版會
  22. 김대준, "고종시대의 국가재정연구" (2004), 태학사
  23. 왕현종, "한국근대국가의 형성과 갑오개혁" (2003), 역사비평사
  24. 최덕수, "조약으로 본 한국 근대사" (2010), 열린책들
  25. 구선희, "개항기 관제개혁을 통해본 권력구조의 변화", 韓國史學報, 12, pp.10~338 (2002), 고려사학회
  26. 김경미, "육영공원의 운영 방식과 學員의 학습실태", 한국교육사학, 21 (1999)
  27. 김경용, "『育英公院日錄』 연구", 교육사학연구, 20(2), pp.25~82 (2010), 교육사학회
  28. 김수암, "세계관 충돌과 1880년대 조선의 근대외교제도 수용 : 외무부서를 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 34 (2000)
  29. 金良洙, "朝鮮後期의 譯官身分에 관한 硏究", 박사, 사학, pp.1987
  30. 김현숙, "韓國 近代 西洋人 顧問官 硏究 (1882-1904)", 박사, 사학과, pp.1999
  31. 박종효, "관립 俄語學校 설립과 교사 비류코프의 活動(1896~1916)", 한국근현대사연구, (46), pp.7~26 (2008), 한국근현대사학회
  32. 박창남, "개화기 관립외국어학교 출신자 연구", 박사, 교육학과 교육사·교육철학전공, pp.2012
  33. 서명일, "육영공원의 교과서와 근대 지식의 전파", 韓國史學報, (56), pp.181~213 (2014), 고려사학회
  34. 송경원, "한말 안경수의 정치활동과 대외인식", 한국사상사학, 8 (1997)
  35. 육영혜, "舊韓末の日本語敎育機關に關する考察", 일본어교육연구, 4 (2003)
  36. 이광린, "육영공원의 설치와 그 변천에 대하여", 동방학지, 6 (1963)
  37. 이광린, "구한말의 관립외국어학교에 대하여", 향토서울, 20 (1964)
  38. 이성환, "러일전쟁과 대한제국의 중립화 정책에 대한 비판적 검토", 국제정치연구, 8(2), pp.165~186 (2005), 동아시아국제정치학회
  39. 이준구, "18ㆍ19세기 身分制 변동 추세와 身分 지속성의 경향", 한국문화, 19 (1997)
  40. 이한섭, "개화기 외교 현장에서의 통역 문제 -1883년 派美 사절단의 예를 중심으로-", 일본어학연구, (25), pp.175~194 (2009), 한국일본어학회
  41. 주진오, "독립협회의 주도세력과 참가계층 -독립문 건립 추진위원회 시기를 중심으로-", 동방학지, 77 (1993)
  42. 하지연, "한말 한서 남궁억의 정치, 언론 활동 연구", 이화사학연구, (31), pp.103~122 (2004), 이화사학연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)