본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선시대 통번역 교육 연구

Study of Translation and Interpreting Education in Joseon Dynasty

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

One of the most notable characteristics of translation and interpreting education in the Joseon Era(AD 1392-1910) is higher degree of segmentation and specialization compared to that in the preceding Corea Dynasty(AD 918-1392). Unlike the previous era when Confucianism, art of war and general knowledge were all taught at Gukjagam, the supreme educational institution, its equivalent in Joseon, Sungkyunkwan, provided education only on Confucianism while other educational disciplines were transferred to different specialized institutions. As per translation and interpreting, translators and interpreters were mainly educated at Sayeokwon while Seungmunwon officials prepared and translated diplomatic documents. Such segmentation and specialization deepened discrimination between Confucianism and other academic fields, lowering the status of translation/interpreting education. The second prominent feature was the emphasis given to interpreting education. A good example was Wooeocheong, an agency installed under Sayeokwon specifically to enhance conversation and interpreting training. Translation and interpreting-related institutions of Joseon including Seungmunwon and Sayeokwon tried to nurture translation and interpreting capabilities in many ways such as translation and publication of conversation text books and employment of foreign instructors. Developing translators and interpreters was a very important national task to Joseon as the country sought Sadaegyorin (serving the great China while having equal relationships with the neighbors) diplomatic policy. Recognizing the importance, the government tried to raise quality of translators and interpreters through systematic education. However, the actual effect was not very high as the education was considered to be meant for a certain class of society given at a certain educational institution.

Abstract

One of the most notable characteristics of translation and interpreting education in the Joseon Era(AD 1392-1910) is higher degree of segmentation and specialization compared to that in the preceding Corea Dynasty(AD 918-1392). Unlike the previous era when Confucianism, art of war and general knowledge were all taught at Gukjagam, the supreme educational institution, its equivalent in Joseon, Sungkyunkwan, provided education only on Confucianism while other educational disciplines were transferred to different specialized institutions. As per translation and interpreting, translators and interpreters were mainly educated at Sayeokwon while Seungmunwon officials prepared and translated diplomatic documents. Such segmentation and specialization deepened discrimination between Confucianism and other academic fields, lowering the status of translation/interpreting education. The second prominent feature was the emphasis given to interpreting education. A good example was Wooeocheong, an agency installed under Sayeokwon specifically to enhance conversation and interpreting training. Translation and interpreting-related institutions of Joseon including Seungmunwon and Sayeokwon tried to nurture translation and interpreting capabilities in many ways such as translation and publication of conversation text books and employment of foreign instructors. Developing translators and interpreters was a very important national task to Joseon as the country sought Sadaegyorin (serving the great China while having equal relationships with the neighbors) diplomatic policy. Recognizing the importance, the government tried to raise quality of translators and interpreters through systematic education. However, the actual effect was not very high as the education was considered to be meant for a certain class of society given at a certain educational institution.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 박성주, "朝鮮前期 對明 御前通事", 경주사학, (29), pp.27~52 (2009), 경주사학회
  2. 신천식, "고려교육사연구" (1995), 경인문화사
  3. 이건형, "조선왕조의 역학교육", 대구교육대학교 논문집, 16, pp.241~263 (1981)
  4. 이미숙, "고려시대 기술관 연구 : 의관과 역관을 중심으로", 박사, 한국사, pp.2003
  5. 이미숙, "高麗時代의 譯官 硏究", 한국사상과 문화, (46), pp.201~234 (2009), 한국사상문화학회
  6. 이성무, "한국의 과거제도" (1994), 집문당
  7. 정광, "조선조 역과 시권연구" (1990), 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
  8. 정광, "사역원과 사역원 역학서의 변화연구", 덕성여대논문집, 14, pp.169~234 (1985)
  9. 정순목, "韓國書院敎育制度硏究" (1979), 嶺南大學校 民族文化硏究所
  10. 정승혜, "한국에서의 외국어 교육에 대한 역사적 고찰", 이중언어학, (21), pp.285~312 (2002), 이중언어학회
  11. 경국대전, "한국정신문화연구원" (2000), 동방미디어
  12. "고려사" (1998), 누리미디어
  13. "고려사절요"[URL]
  14. "국역 조선왕조실록"[URL]
  15. "국역 통문관지" (2004), 세종대왕기념사업회, 동방미디어
  16. "반계수록" (2001), 누리미디어
  17. "국어국문학자료사전" (1998), 이응백[URL]
  18. "한국고전용어사전"[URL]
  19. "한국민족문화대백과사전"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)