본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

R&D의 국제적 파급효과에 대한 무역과 직접투자의 역할

Trade, Foreign Direct Investment and R&D Spillovers

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

본 연구는 1981년부터 1999년까지 13개 OECD 국가들의 산업별 자료를 이용하여 R&D 투자의 국가간 파급효과에 있어서 무역과 해외직접투자의 역할이 존재하는지에 대한 실증분석을 수행하고 있다. 특히, 무역과 관련된 국가간 R&D 전이의 측정에 대한 전통적 방법론의 문제점을 극복하기 위해, 무역관계에 있어서 “교역량의 효과” (volume effect)와 동시에 “교역상품구성의 효과” (variety effect)의 중요성을 강조하고 있다. 즉, 밀접한 교역관계를 가진 국가들 사이에 더 강한 국가간 R&D의 파급효과가 존재하지만, 어떠한 상품을 거래하는가 하는 “교역상품구성효과”도 중요한 역할을 한다는 점이다. 이러한 이론적 논의를 바탕으로 개발된 새로운 측정방법을 이용하여 수행한 다양한 패널분석의 결과는, 국가간 R&D 전이에서 교역량의 관계가 중요한 역할을 하지만, 특히 교역상품 구성효과가 더 중요한 역할을 하고 있음을 보여주고 있다. 또한 동시에 국가간 기술전이의 중요한 수단으로 여겨지는 해외직접투자는 상대적으로 미약한 역할을 하고 있음을 보여주고 있다.

Abstract

The paper examines the evidence of R & D spillovers through trade and foreign direct investment at the industrial sectoral level. Specifically, it focuses on the appropriate measure of foreign R&D stocks embodied in imports, and proposes an alternative measure to the traditional measure. With a new measure of foreign technology, this paper then empirically distinguishes between R&D spillovers from import volume and from import variety. Panel estimations with fixed effects use a data set comprised of eight sectors in the manufacturing industry of thirteen OECD countries from 1981 to 1999. This empirical work at disaggregated level has shown the evidence to generally support the role of manufacturing imports in the international diffusion of technology. In particular, the results imply that the impact of import variety proves stronger and more significant in investigating trade-related R&D spillovers. The evidence indicates the variety effect dominates the volume effect, and hence import variety proves more important in explaining trade-related technological diffusion. This paper also investigates R&D spillovers occurring simultaneously through trade and non-trade (i.e., FDI) channels, Empirical results provide no strong evidence on R&D spillovers through FDI, although FDI is often considered as an important channel for technological diffusion. The evidence implies that the effect of trade channel dominates that of the FDI channel. and finds that FDI only weakly affects domestic productivity.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. "Endogenous Growth Theory" (1998), MIT press
  2. "Economic Growth" (1995), McGraw-Hill
  3. "How does foreign direct investment Affect economic growth?", 45, pp.115~135 (1998)
  4. "International R & D spillovers", 39, pp.859~887 (1995)
  5. "North-South R & D Spillovers", 107, pp.134~149 (1997)
  6. "Are there international R & D spillovers among randomly matched trade partners? A response to Keller" (1999)
  7. "Learning to learn: The role of imitation and trade in technological Diffusion" (1997)
  8. "The dual nature of trade Measuring its impact on imitation and Growth" (1998)
  9. "Trade in ideas Patenting and productivity in the OECD", 40, pp.251~278 (1996)
  10. "and Growth in Developing countries Journal of Economic Literature", pp.1358~1393 (1993)
  11. "Does trade cause growth?", 89, pp.379~399 (1999)
  12. "Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy" (1991), MIT Press
  13. "R&D-based models of economic growth", 103, pp.759~784 (1995)
  14. "Are international R & D spillovers trade-related? Analyzing spillover among randomly matched trade partners", 42, pp.1469~1481 (1998)
  15. "International R & D spillovers: A re-Examination", 5668 (1996)
  16. "International R & D spillovers: A re-Examination", 42(8), pp.1483~1491 (1998)
  17. "Quarterly Journal of Economics", eco(mic integration and endogeus growth), pp.531~555 (1991)
  18. "Trade and Industrial Policy Reform, J. Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan eds. Handbook of Development Economics", 3(3), pp.2925~2982 (1995), North-Holland
  19. "Journal of Political Economy", pp.71~102 (1990)
  20. "Growth without scale effect", 106, pp.41~63 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)