몽골의 체제전환과 북한에 주는 시사점
Mongolia’s transformation and Its Implications for North Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Mongolia is the only state in Asia where democracy has been successfully consolidated following a transition from the socialist system. Under the influence of the Soviet Union, Mongolia became the second socialist state in the world in 1924, and introduced democracy and the market economy in 1990 to become a “double transition” state undergoing post-socialist transition in both its political and the economic system. After its transition, Mongolia’s democracy has continually advanced without backsliding into authoritarianism. There have not been a military coup or attempts at subversion by forces from the former ruling-communist party. Also, after the transition of both its political and economic systems, Mongolia has shown openness to support from the international community in making progress with respect to economic growth. Furthermore, Mongolia has maintained independence through diplomacy that has sought balance between Russia and China. The distinct features of Mongolia’s post-socialist transition are that it was not a democracy with civil society before the introduction of the communist party-state, and that its economy had not developed to a point favourable to democratization after socialism. Despite such weak prerequisites for successful democratization, Mongolia has abolished the communist party dictatorship through constitutional reform in 1990, and introduced market economy in 1991 by implementing price liberalization. By 1992, Mongolia had enacted a new constitution that sought to completely end all structures and institutions of the old socialist system. Such features of Mongolian transition have important implications for North Korea. First, the foundations upon which democratization was to occur at the time of Mongolia’s post-socialist transition were inadequate. After transition however, its democracy has not only successfully settled but is now in the process of being consolidated. From Mongolia’s case, it is possible to infer that post-socialist transition does not necessarily occur only when theoretically presumed conditions are satisfied. Successful transition can occur even when such prerequisites for democratization are not fulfilled. Second, although the possibility of change in the North Korean regime is currently low, Mongolia’s system transition can offer meaningful lessons for North Korea. If a systemic transition is attempted through a top-down process of change like in the case of Mongolia, it is possible to expect a peaceful and stable post-socialist transition for North Korea too. Also, the groundwork for inter-Korean integration free from the conflicting interests of neighboring states with respect to unification can be put in place. As such, Mongolia’s transition case offers a possible example for North Korea’s transition, and it is in this context that this paper explores Mongolia’s transition and democratization process. This paper first identifies the features of Mongolian democratization and transition, and then analyzes the key factors for its democratic progress after transition to draw implications for the means and direction of North Korea’s system transition in the future.
Abstract
Mongolia is the only state in Asia where democracy has been successfully consolidated following a transition from the socialist system. Under the influence of the Soviet Union, Mongolia became the second socialist state in the world in 1924, and introduced democracy and the market economy in 1990 to become a “double transition” state undergoing post-socialist transition in both its political and the economic system. After its transition, Mongolia’s democracy has continually advanced without backsliding into authoritarianism. There have not been a military coup or attempts at subversion by forces from the former ruling-communist party. Also, after the transition of both its political and economic systems, Mongolia has shown openness to support from the international community in making progress with respect to economic growth. Furthermore, Mongolia has maintained independence through diplomacy that has sought balance between Russia and China. The distinct features of Mongolia’s post-socialist transition are that it was not a democracy with civil society before the introduction of the communist party-state, and that its economy had not developed to a point favourable to democratization after socialism. Despite such weak prerequisites for successful democratization, Mongolia has abolished the communist party dictatorship through constitutional reform in 1990, and introduced market economy in 1991 by implementing price liberalization. By 1992, Mongolia had enacted a new constitution that sought to completely end all structures and institutions of the old socialist system. Such features of Mongolian transition have important implications for North Korea. First, the foundations upon which democratization was to occur at the time of Mongolia’s post-socialist transition were inadequate. After transition however, its democracy has not only successfully settled but is now in the process of being consolidated. From Mongolia’s case, it is possible to infer that post-socialist transition does not necessarily occur only when theoretically presumed conditions are satisfied. Successful transition can occur even when such prerequisites for democratization are not fulfilled. Second, although the possibility of change in the North Korean regime is currently low, Mongolia’s system transition can offer meaningful lessons for North Korea. If a systemic transition is attempted through a top-down process of change like in the case of Mongolia, it is possible to expect a peaceful and stable post-socialist transition for North Korea too. Also, the groundwork for inter-Korean integration free from the conflicting interests of neighboring states with respect to unification can be put in place. As such, Mongolia’s transition case offers a possible example for North Korea’s transition, and it is in this context that this paper explores Mongolia’s transition and democratization process. This paper first identifies the features of Mongolian democratization and transition, and then analyzes the key factors for its democratic progress after transition to draw implications for the means and direction of North Korea’s system transition in the future.
참고문헌 (19)
- 금희연, "몽골의 체제전환과 민주화과정에 관한 연구 - 역대 총선과 대선을 중심으로 -", 통일전략, 9(2), pp.181~224 (2009), 한국통일전략학회
- 박정원, "몽골의 체제전환법제의 동향과 북한법에 주는 시사점 -헌법을 중심으로-", 저스티스, 158(3), pp.212~242 (2017), 한국법학원
- 송병구, "민주화 이후 몽골 정치의 변화와 전망: 총선과 대선을 중심으로", 평화학연구, 14(1), pp.195~218 (2013), 사단법인 한국평화연구학회
- 양길현, "몽골 민주화의 추동요인과 진전과정: 1990년 총선과 1992년총선을 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 38(2), pp.313~328 (1998)
- 진영재, "정당제도화의 유형과 체제선택의 경험적 논의: 15개선진자본국가들의 비교연구", 한국정치학회보, 31(4), pp.161~185 (1997)
- 정태일, "몽골 민주화 이행과정의 분석", 유라시아연구, 11(4), pp.97~119 (2014), 아시아.유럽미래학회[DOI]
- Luvsan Namnansuren, "몽골의 민주주의 : 이행과 정착을 중심으로", 사회과학연구, 52(1), pp.65~121 (2013), 사회과학연구원
- Alan J . K. Sanders, "Mongolia’s New Constitution: Blueprint for Democracy", Asian Survey, 32(6), pp.46~53 (1992)
- Kenneth Jarrett, "Mongolia in 1987: Out from the Cold?", Asian Survey, 28(1), pp.78~85 (1987)
- Nyamosor Tuya, "Mongolia in 2005: Sharing Power, Dealing with Corruption", Asian Survey, 46(1), pp.79~84 (2005)
- Steven M. Fish, "Mongolia: Democracy without Prerequistes", Journal of Democracy, 9(3), pp.127~140 (1998)
- Steven M. Fish, "The Inner Asian anomaly: Mongolia’s democratization in comparative perspective", Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 34, pp.323~338 (2001)
- Steven M. Fish, "The Secret Supports of Mon golian Democracy", Journal of Democracy, 28(1), pp.129~142 (2017)
- Samuel P. Huntington, "The third wave : democratization in the late twentieth century" (1991), University of Oklahoma Press
- Tsedendambyn Batbayar, "Foreign policy and domestic reform in Mongolia", Central Asian Survey, 22(1), pp.45~59 (2003)
- Verena Fritz, "Mongolia: Dependent Democratization", Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 18(4), pp.75~100 (2002)
- Verena Fritz, "Mongolia : The Rise and Travails of a Deviant Democracy", Democratization, 15(4), pp.766~788 (2008)
- William R. Heaton, "Mongolia in 1990: Upheaval, Reform, But No Revolution Yet", Asian Survey, 31(1), pp.50~56 (1990)
- "The Great Transformation" (1993)[URL]
