「しよう」と「하자」
“Shiyou” and “Haja”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper studies the semantic functioning of Shiyou and Haja, the representativeform of inducement in Japanese and Korean, respectively. In particular, it investigatesthe differences of the semantic functions between Shiyou and i and what cause them,focusing on the case in which the agent is the speaker and the case in which theagent is the speaker as well as the listener. In the case in which the agent is the speaker, the semantic function of Shiyouand Haja can be divided into will expression and action interest. First of all, in thecase of will expression, while the execution of the action has nothing to do withthe listener in the case of Shiyou, the will to execute the action that has not yetrealized is directly related to the listener in the case of Haja. Second, in the caseof action interest, the speaker suggests the action to be executed on behalf of thelistener in the case of Shiyou whereas the speaker, on behalf of him/herself, asksthe listener to understand the execution of the action in the case of Haja. In addition, in the case in which the agent is the speaker as well as the listener,the semantic function of Shiyou and Haja can be divided into suggestion andinducement. First of all, in the case of suggestion, while it is a suggestion of thespeaker to the listener as a potentiality in the situation where the execution of theaction is not yet decided in the case of Shiyou, Haja, which is not employed assuggestion, is an inducement that asks the listener to join the action that is alreadydecided by the speaker. Second, in the case of inducement, Shiyou makes roomsfor the listener to contemplate whether s/he would accept the demand of the speakerwhereas Haja, which is unable to be employed for upper person, has the enforcementpower that gives no such rooms for the listener. This study implies that these differences derive from the fact that while Shiyouis originally not a form of inducement, but a form of expression of the speaker’swill, Haja is originally a form of inducement in which the listener is asked to jointhe execution of the action by the speaker.
Abstract
This paper studies the semantic functioning of Shiyou and Haja, the representativeform of inducement in Japanese and Korean, respectively. In particular, it investigatesthe differences of the semantic functions between Shiyou and i and what cause them,focusing on the case in which the agent is the speaker and the case in which theagent is the speaker as well as the listener. In the case in which the agent is the speaker, the semantic function of Shiyouand Haja can be divided into will expression and action interest. First of all, in thecase of will expression, while the execution of the action has nothing to do withthe listener in the case of Shiyou, the will to execute the action that has not yetrealized is directly related to the listener in the case of Haja. Second, in the caseof action interest, the speaker suggests the action to be executed on behalf of thelistener in the case of Shiyou whereas the speaker, on behalf of him/herself, asksthe listener to understand the execution of the action in the case of Haja. In addition, in the case in which the agent is the speaker as well as the listener,the semantic function of Shiyou and Haja can be divided into suggestion andinducement. First of all, in the case of suggestion, while it is a suggestion of thespeaker to the listener as a potentiality in the situation where the execution of theaction is not yet decided in the case of Shiyou, Haja, which is not employed assuggestion, is an inducement that asks the listener to join the action that is alreadydecided by the speaker. Second, in the case of inducement, Shiyou makes roomsfor the listener to contemplate whether s/he would accept the demand of the speakerwhereas Haja, which is unable to be employed for upper person, has the enforcementpower that gives no such rooms for the listener. This study implies that these differences derive from the fact that while Shiyouis originally not a form of inducement, but a form of expression of the speaker’swill, Haja is originally a form of inducement in which the listener is asked to jointhe execution of the action by the speaker.
참고문헌 (26)
- 安達太郎, "シナイカとシヨウとシヨウカ―勧誘文―, In 日本語類義表現の文法(上)", pp.226~234 (1995), くろしお出版
- 安達太郎, "意志のモダリティと周辺形式", 広島女子大国文, 16, pp.左1~左16 (1999), 広島女子大学国文学会
- 仁田義雄, "日本語のモダリティと人称", pp.17~183 (1991), ひつじ書房
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法4 第8部モダリティ", pp.51~66 (2003), くろしお出版
- 樋口文彦, "勧誘文―しよう,しましょう―, In ことばの科学5", pp.174~187 (1992), むぎ書房
- 宮崎和人, "新日本語文法選書4モダリティ", pp.18~40 (2002), くろしお出版
- 森山卓郎, "意志のモダリティについて", 阪大日本語研究, 2, pp.1~19 (1990), 大阪大学文学部日本学科(言語系)
- 김태엽, "국어 종결어미의 문법", pp.11~38 (2001), 국어자료원
- 봉미경, "韓國語 請誘文과 提案 表現", 어문연구(語文硏究), 37(1), pp.417~440 (2009), 한국어문교육연구회
- 양인석, "한국어양상의 화용론:제안문과 명령문", 언어, 1(1), pp.121~141 (1976), 한국언어학회
- 임동훈, "한국어의 문장 유형과 용법", 國語學, (60), pp.323~359 (2011), 국어학회
- 장경희, "청유 화행에 대한 수락과 거절", 텍스트언어학, 9, pp.111~143 (2000), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 조성훈, "現代國語의 命令表現 硏究", 석사, 국어교육학, pp.1988
- "医龍Ⅱ", フジテレビ, ~ (2007)
- "14歳の母", 日本テレビ, ~ (2006)
- "チェイス~国税査察官~", NHK, ~ (2010)
- "華麗なる一族", TBS, ~ (2007)
- "3年B組金八先生", TBS, ~ (2007)
- "Around40~注文の多いオンナたち~", TBS, ~ (2008)
- "トップセールス", NHK, ~ (2008)
- "ラスト・フレンズ", フジテレビ, ~ (2008)
- "강남엄마 따라잡기", SBS, ~ (2007)
- "섬마을 선생님", SBS, ~ (2004)
- "불한당", SBS, ~ (2008)
- "「オールイン」で始める韓国語 シナリオ対訳集", キマネ旬報社
- 金井孝利, "「冬のソナタ」で始める韓国語 シナリオ対訳集", キマネ旬報社
