한국어 공손 표현의 유형별 실현 양상
Politeness Expressions in Korean: Types and Realization
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, the definition of practical aspects of Korean politeness expression as ‘the act of linguistic expression of modesty and propriety’ and the realization by type are studied. The politeness expressions can be divided into ‘listener honorific’ and ‘speaker’s moderation’ based on the principle of their function. The politeness expressions of ‘listener honorific’ are also possible with the phrase ‘relative honorific expression’ being the main one and using words that show courtesy or goodwill to the listener. This paper explains how each type of politeness expressions is used by adding additional expressions to the expressions listed in previous studies. The politeness expressions of ‘speaker modesty’ include ‘speaker shows a modest stance,’ which shows humility to the speaker or to the subject associated with the speaker, ‘contents of discourse change to a modest way,’ which humbly expresses the content of the discourse, and ‘adding hedge,’ which adds an incidental phrase that enhances politeness. In the future, categories related to politeness expressions (‘non-politeness expressions’, ‘impoliteness expressions’ and ‘too politeness expressions’) should be studied.
Abstract
In this study, the definition of practical aspects of Korean politeness expression as ‘the act of linguistic expression of modesty and propriety’ and the realization by type are studied. The politeness expressions can be divided into ‘listener honorific’ and ‘speaker’s moderation’ based on the principle of their function. The politeness expressions of ‘listener honorific’ are also possible with the phrase ‘relative honorific expression’ being the main one and using words that show courtesy or goodwill to the listener. This paper explains how each type of politeness expressions is used by adding additional expressions to the expressions listed in previous studies. The politeness expressions of ‘speaker modesty’ include ‘speaker shows a modest stance,’ which shows humility to the speaker or to the subject associated with the speaker, ‘contents of discourse change to a modest way,’ which humbly expresses the content of the discourse, and ‘adding hedge,’ which adds an incidental phrase that enhances politeness. In the future, categories related to politeness expressions (‘non-politeness expressions’, ‘impoliteness expressions’ and ‘too politeness expressions’) should be studied.
참고문헌 (22)
- 구현정, "공손법의 실현 양상", 담화와 인지, 11(3), pp.1~24 (2004), 담화·인지언어학회
- 김명운, "현대국어의 공손성 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2009
- 김서형, "한국어 화행에서 공손성의 실현 양상", 한국어학, 61, pp.123~143 (2013), 한국어학회
- 김수정, "한국어 교재의 공손성 분석 : 요청 발화를 중심으로", 석사, 한국학, pp.2011
- 金禧淑, "現代國語의 恭遜表現 연구 : 敬語法과 關聯지어", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1991
- 노심덕, "영어와 한국어의 지시 화행에 나타난 언어적 정중성", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.1998
- 문금현, "한국어 공손성 표현의 생성 유형별 특징 -공손성의 강도와 사용 양상을 중심으로-", 國語學, (82), pp.27~66 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박소연, "한국어 공손성 연구의 쟁점 -선행연구 분석을 중심으로-", 언어와 문화, 13(4), pp.59~82 (2017), 한국언어문화교육학회[DOI]
- 유혜령, "국어의 형태․통사적 공손 표지에 대한 연구", 청람어문교육, (41), pp.377~409 (2010), 청람어문교육학회[DOI]
- 윤정화, "한국어 공손 표현 연구", 박사, 국어교육학과, pp.2014
- 이영래, "언어행위에서의 (반)공손과 대인관계", 한국언어문화학, 3(1), pp.105~124 (2006), 국제한국언어문화학회
- 이해영, "현대 한국어 활용어미의 의미와 부담줄이기의 상관성", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1996
- 전혜영, "한국어 공손표현의 의미", 한국어 의미학, 15, pp.71~91 (2004), 한국어의미학회
- 조준학, "영어와 국어의 honorifics 비교 서설", 영어영문학, 72, pp.325~340 (1979), 한국영어영문학회
- 허상희, "한국어 공손표현의 화용론적 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2010
- 허상회, "한국어 공손표현의 화용론적 연구" (2012), 소통
- 홍승아, "한국어 지시화행에서 나타난 공손성의 이해와 사용 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- Brown, P, "Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Goffman, E., "International Ritual : Essays in Face to Face behavior" (1967), Anchor Books
- Grice, H. P., "Syntax and Semantics Vol 3", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Lakoff, R., "The Logic of Politeness, or Minding your P’s and Q’s", Proceeding of ninth regional meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.292~305 (1973), Chicago Linguistic Society
- Leech, G. N., "Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman