집단괴롭힘과 사회적 선호도의 관계의 다양성 : 회귀혼합모델의 적용
Differential association of social preference in terms of bullying and victimization : A regression mixture approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구의 목적은 집단괴롭힘 피해 및 가해행동과 사회적 선호도의 관계의 이질적 특징을 탐색하고 이러한 이질적 관계의 이유를 알아보는데 있었다. 332명의 초등학교 6학년 학생들을 대상으로 회귀혼합모델을 검증한 결과, 집단괴롭힘 피해 및 가해행동과 사회적 선호도(또래수용, 또래거부)의 관계패턴에 따라 가해자 무관형 집단(26%), 피해자 거부/ 가해자 수용 집단(26%), 가해자 양면형 집단(21%), 그리고 피해자 거부/ 가해자 비수용 집단(27%)의 네 잠재계층으로 구분되었다. 잠재계층을 종속변인으로 하는 다항 로지스틱 회귀분석을 실시한 결과, 집단소속에 대한 가장 강력한 예측요인은 관계적 공격성이었으며, 신체적 공격성 및 언어적 공격성의 효과도 일부 집단비교에서 유의미하였다. 전반적으로 관계적 공격성이 높은 아동일수록 다른 세 집단에 비해 피해자 거부/ 가해자 수용 집단에 속할 확률이 유의미하게 높았다. 관계적 공격성이 높을수록, 언어적 및 신체적 공격성이 낮을수록 가해자 양면형 집단보다는 피해자 거부/ 가해자 수용 집단에 속할 가능성이 높았다. 후속연구에 대한 제언 및 실천적 함의가 논의되었다.
Abstract
The present study explored the heterogeneous nature of the relationship between social preferences and bullying/victimization as well as a number of plausible reasons for these differences. 332 sixth graders (51% girls) were used as subjects, and regression mixture analysis identified four latent classes with varying associations between social preferences on the one hand and bullying and victimization on the other; No Preference to Bully Class, Reject Victim‐Accept Bully Class, Controversial to Bully Class, and Reject Victim‐Not Reject Bully Class. 26% of the participants were classified as belonging to the No‐Preference to Bully Class, indicating that one fourth of children do not reveal any differences in terms of social preference regardless of their bullying behaviors. Peer‐reported relational aggression was the most predictive of class membership. Latent class differences in physical aggression, verbal aggression, and children’s gender were also found. Overall, children with higher relational aggression had significantly greater odds of being in the Reject Victim‐Accept Bully Class than in any other classes. Higher relational aggression, lower verbal and physical aggression was predictive of children being more likely to be in the Reject Victim‐Accept Bully Class than in the Controversial to Bully Class. The implications of these findings are also discussed.
참고문헌 (46)
- 권재기, "집단따돌림 피해경험의 발달양상과 내면화⋅외현화 문제행동의 변화 －잠재계층 성장분석(LCGA)⋅다집단 성장혼합모형(GMM)을 이용한 종단연구－", 한국아동복지학, 34(34), pp.95~126 (2011), 한국아동복지학회
- 이은주, "내ㆍ외향적 행동문제와 집단괴롭힘의 관계에 대한 자아개념과 또래관계의 조절효과", 초등교육연구, 15(2), pp.345~364 (2002), 한국초등교육학회
- 이은희, "학교요인과 학교폭력피해경험이 중학생의 등교공포와 교내폭력 심각성 인식에 미치는 영향연구", 한국청소년연구, 20(3), pp.281~304 (2009), 한국청소년정책연구원
- 임효진, "사회적 행동이 읽기성장에 미치는 영향: 잠재집단 성장모형을 통한 종단연구자료 분석", 교육심리연구, 26(1), pp.199~224 (2012), 한국교육심리학회
- 학교폭력 실태조사 보고서, "청소년폭력예방재단", 청소년폭력예방재단, ~ (2009)
- Arsenio, W. F., "Varieties of childhood bullying: Values, emotion processes, and social competence", Social Development, 10, pp.59~73 (2001)
- Bergman, L. R., "A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology", Development and Psychopathology, 9, pp.291~319 (1997)
- Buhs, E. S., "Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement", Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, pp.1~13 (2006)
- Cillessen, A., "From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status", Child Development, 75(1), pp.147~163 (2004)
- Coie, J., "Continuities and changes in children’s social status: A five year longitudinal study", Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, pp.261~281 (1983)
- Coie, J., "Peer group behavior and social status, In Peer rejection in childhood", pp.17~59 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Crick, N. R., "Relational and overt aggression in preschool", Developmental Psychology, 33, pp.579~588 (1997)
- Crick, N., "Relational aggression, gender, and socialpsychological adjustment", Child Development, 66, pp.710~722 (1995)
- Crick, N. R., "Relationally and physically aggressive children’s intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations", Child Development, 73, pp.1134~1142 (2002)
- Cullerton-Sen, C., "Understanding the effects of physical and relational victimization: The utility of multiple perspectives in predicting social-emotional adjustment", School Psychology Review, 34, pp.147~160 (2005)
- de Bruyn, E. H., "Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence", Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, pp.543~566 (2010)
- Ding, C. S., "Using regression mixture analysis in educational research", Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 11, pp.1~11 (2006)
- Eslea, M., "Friendship and loneliness among bullies and victims: Data from seven countries", Aggressive Behavior, 30, pp.71~83 (2004)
- Estell, D. B., "Bullies and victims in rural African American youth: Behavioral characteristics and social network placement", Aggressive Behavior, 33, pp.145~159 (2007)
- Farmer, T., "Peer relations of bullies, bully-victims, and victims: The two social worlds of bullying in second-grade classrooms", Elementary School Journal, 110(3), pp.364~392 (2010)
- Hanish, L. D., "The social development of young children’s peer victimization", Social Development, 14, pp.2~19 (2005)
- Hawley, P. H., "Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control in preschoolers", International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, pp.167~176 (2002)
- Katz, S., "Physical appearance: The importance of being beautiful, In Down to earth sociology: Introductory readings", pp.313~320 (2003), Free Press
- LaFontana, K. M., "Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers : A multimethod assessment", Developmental Psychology, 38, pp.635~647 (2002)
- Leadbeater, B., "Sex differences in the personal costs and benefits of relational and physical aggression in high school", Aggressive Behavior, 32, pp.409~419 (2006)
- Lee, E. J., "The relationship of aggression and bullying to social preference: Differences in gender and types of aggression", International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(4), pp.323~330 (2009)
- Little, T. D., "Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behavior", International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(2), pp.122~133 (2003)
- Miller-Johnson, S., "Peer rejection and aggression and early starter models of conduct disorder", Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, pp.217~230 (2002)
- Nagin, D. S., "Group-based modeling of development" (2005), Harvard University Press
- Muthēn, B. O., "Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes", Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, pp.882~891 (2000)
- Muthēn, B. O., "Mplus User’ Guide" (1998), Muthēn & Muthēn
- Olweus, D., "Bullying at school" (1993), Blackwell
- Patterson, G. R., "A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior", American Psychologist, 44(2), pp.329~335 (1989)
- Pellegrini, A. D., "The role of aggressive and affiliative behaviors in resource control: A behavioral ecological perspective", Developmental Review, 28, pp.461~487 (2008)
- Perry, D. G., "Victims of peer aggression", Developmental Psychology, 24, pp.807~814 (1988)
- Price, J., "Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood: Relations to peer status and social context dimensions", Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, pp.455~471 (1989)
- Putallaz, M., "Overt and relational aggression and victimization: Multiple perspectives within the school setting", Journal of School Psychology, 45, pp.523~547 (2007)
- Rose, A., "Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations", Developmental Psychology, 40, pp.378~387 (2004)
- Salmivalli, C., "Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter?", Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41(1), pp.17~24 (2000)
- Sentse, M., "Person–group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status", Journal of Abnormnal Psychology, 35, pp.1009~1019 (2007)
- Solbere, M. E., "Bullies and victims in school? Are they the same pupils", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, pp.441~464 (2007)
- Sutton, J., "Bullying and “theory of mind”: A critique of the “social skills deficit” view of anti-social behavior", Social Development, 8(1), pp.117~127 (1999)
- Vaillancourt, T., "Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies", Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, pp.157~176 (2003)
- Van Horn, M. L., "Assessing differential effects: Applying regression mixture models to identify variations in the influence of family resources on academic achievement", Developmental Psychology, 45, pp.1298~1313 (2009)
- von Eye, A., "Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development", Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, pp.390~420 (2006)
- Waasdorp, T. E., "Examining student responses to frequent bullying: A latent class approach", Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), pp.336~352 (2011)