‌내러티브를 통한 ‘사고와 표현’ 수업모형 비교

Abstract

The courses titled ‘Thinking and expression’ 1 & 2 from Chosun University are designed for entire freshmen students and these same courses are lectured by diverse professors for each class. The class syllabus of each lecturer can be altered or varied based on textbooks of ‘Thinking and Expression.’ Students can choose to take a class among many professors after understanding characteristics of lecturers. Therefore, students' various needs for the courses can be met by professors delivering the lecture, ‘Thinking and Expression’ in the same way and at the same time study activities for better qaulity of courses are performed to emphasize characteristics of lecturers. It is meaningful in that a lecturer teaching ‘Thinking and Expression’ doesn't cover only one course but it is also taught by humanities specialists. So it appears to be necessary to analyze courses of professors from the field of humanities before deducting the result about effects on students. Lecturers compare and analyze each course model through joint research during the first semester of year 2013. Course models in conducting fundamental education by professors specialized in Korean Literature, History and Education will be compared. Comparison will be made in order, which is as follows; 1) Class syllabus, 2) Compare models and narrative lessons. Thus, the objective of this course is to instill critical and creative thinking in students so that they can express their thoughts more efficiently, improve communication ability through writing and presentation and become intelligent, well-educated people with broader views and opinions by fostering insight about humanities. Classes through the narrative(s) can help discover the structure of knowledge by letting us understand something universal and comprehensive that surpasses information and facts that we have known.