介在要素有りタイプの動詞結合の下位分類 - 「가다」をV2とする例を中心に -
Subclassification of Verb Combination of Type with a medium morpheme -By Focusing on Examples to have Subsequent Verb with 「Go」-
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article attempted to subclassify on the basis of syntactic and semantic characteristics targeting verb combination of type with a medium morpheme to have subsequent verb with 「Go」. Concretely, first of all, targeting typical examples judged that two verbs were closed simply, those syntactic and semantic characteristics were extracted. And those characteristics were established as a standard of analysis and finally following two factors were pointed out as major achievement by analyzing individual examples per each standard. 1) As for the verb combination of type with a medium morpheme to have subsequent verb with 「Go」, it is distributed consecutively from the most syntactic one to the most morphological one. 2)Generally, examples called as 「補助動詞結合(auxiliary verb combination)」 are morphological composition and considered as a kind of ‘compound verb’ Furthermore, it was emphasized that the analysis on verb combination should be performed in the form to consider contexts thoroughly and the overall examination applied lots of standards is required to subclassify verb combination, too.
Abstract
This article attempted to subclassify on the basis of syntactic and semantic characteristics targeting verb combination of type with a medium morpheme to have subsequent verb with 「Go」. Concretely, first of all, targeting typical examples judged that two verbs were closed simply, those syntactic and semantic characteristics were extracted. And those characteristics were established as a standard of analysis and finally following two factors were pointed out as major achievement by analyzing individual examples per each standard. 1) As for the verb combination of type with a medium morpheme to have subsequent verb with 「Go」, it is distributed consecutively from the most syntactic one to the most morphological one. 2)Generally, examples called as 「補助動詞結合(auxiliary verb combination)」 are morphological composition and considered as a kind of ‘compound verb’ Furthermore, it was emphasized that the analysis on verb combination should be performed in the form to consider contexts thoroughly and the overall examination applied lots of standards is required to subclassify verb combination, too.
참고문헌 (41)
- 강현화, "국어의 동사연결 구성에 대한 연구" (1998), 한국문화사
- "표준국어대사전", 국립국어연구원[URL]
- 김계곤, "현대 국어의 조어법 연구" (1996), 박이정
- 김기혁, "국어 합성동사 생성의 통사․의미학적 해석", 국어국문학, 116, pp.1~37 (1996), 국어국문학회
- 김석득, "우리말 형태론―말본론―" (1992), 탑출판사
- 김인택, "동사 어근 구성 합성어 형성의 특징- V+{은,는,을}+N, V+아+V 형을 중심으로 -", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (43), pp.1~22 (2003), 한민족어문학회
- 김창섭, "現代国語의 複合動詞 研究", 国語研究, 47 (1981), 国語研究会
- 김창섭, "국어의 단어형성과 단어구조 연구" (1996), 국어학회
- 남기심, "이음씨끝 “－아”를 매개로 한 겹씨의 움직씨 형성에 대하여", 한글, 146, pp.491~498 (1970), 한글학회
- 박선옥, "국어 보조동사의 통사와 의미 연구" (2005), 도서출판 역락
- 배덕희, "韓․日移動動詞に関する研究Ⅱ―｢어 가다․어 오다｣ ｢て行く․て来る｣を中心に―", 상명대학교 논문집, 17, pp.407~428 (1986), 상명여자사범대학
- 서정수, "국어문법" (2006), 한세본
- 손세모돌, "강현화의 동사연결구성에 대한 이의-강현화(1998)을 중심으로-", 형태론, 8(1), pp.199~216 (2006), 형태론
- 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원, "연세한국어사전" (1998), 두산동아
- 이관규, "동사연결의 유형과 특성", 우리어문연구, (3), pp.1~19 (1989), 우리어문학회
- 이관규, "국어 대등구성 연구" (1992), 서광학술자료사
- 의 구조, "담화와 인지", 1996, 83~99, pp.담화인지언어학회
- 이미숙, "한․일어의 ｢동사＋동사구성｣의 체계에 관한 연구(1)", 인문과학연구논총, 20, pp.95~108 (1999), 명지대학교 인문과학연구소
- 이선영, "국어 어간복합어 연구" (2006), 태학사
- 이익섭, "국어문법론강의" (2001), 學研社
- 이정훈, "V-어V' 합성동사 형성 규칙과 범주통용", 어문학, (91), pp.129~161 (2006), 한국어문학회
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1961), 정음문화사
- 함희진, "동사 연결 구성의 통합과 합성동사 형성", 한국문법교육학회 학술발표논문집, 2010(2), pp.1~9 (2010), 한국문법교육학회
- 황병순, "국어 복합동사에 대하여", 한민족어문학, 13, pp.191~203 (1986), 한민족어문학회
- 황화상, "국어 합성 동사의 의미", 한국어학, 15, pp.14~324 (2002), 한국어학회
- 浅尾仁彦, "動詞連続の文法的性質を捉え直す―日韓対照を通じて―", 関西言語学会第34回大会ワークショップ ｢複雑述語の形式․機能とダイナミズム｣ ハンドアウト, pp.1~11 (2009), 関西言語学会
- 이충규, "形態レベルからみた日韓語の動詞結合 -「連用形」「語基」「語幹」を適用した形態構造分析 -", 日本語文學, 1(43), pp.89~117 (2009), 한국일본어문학회
- 이충규, "音韻レベルからみた日韓語の動詞結合― 音韻現象の分析を通して ―", 日本文化學報, (45), pp.25~46 (2010), 한국일본문화학회
- 이충규, "動詞結合｛－어다｝有りタイプについて -日本語との対照も兼ねて-", 日本語文學, 1(46), pp.81~107 (2010), 한국일본어문학회
- 이충규, "日韓語の動詞結合の形成過程と分類 ―「日韓語の動詞結合形成モデル」の構築を通して―", 日本文化學報, (47), pp.83~100 (2010), 한국일본문화학회
- 이충규, "日韓語の動詞結合形成モデルの活用 ―「～食べる」と「～먹다」の例を通して―", 日本文化學報, (50), pp.41~60 (2011), 한국일본문화학회
- 이충규, "韓国語の動詞結合の日本語訳について ― 内山(1997)の例を中心に ―", 日本語敎育, (62), pp.143~161 (2012), 한국일본어교육학회
- 李美淑, "韓日両語の動詞結合構成の体系及び統語性についての対照研究", 日本学報, 46, pp.139~153 (2001), 韓国日本学会
- 内山政春, "延世大学校言語情報開発研究院編『延世韓国語辞典』", 朝鮮学報, 172, pp.159~168 (1999), 朝鮮学会
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅱ" (1984), くろしお出版
- 山本清隆, "ソフトウェア文書のための日本語処理の研究－5―計算機用レキシコンのために―", pp.315~380 (1983), 情報処理振興事業協会
- 山本清隆, "複合動詞の格支配", 都大論究, 21, pp.32~49 (1984), 東京都立大学国語国文学会
- 山本清隆, "第三部複合動詞辞書複合動詞結合情報付き動詞辞書作成の試み", ソフトウェア文書のための日本語処理の研究, 11, pp.419~512 (1992), 情報処理振興事業協会技術センター
- 油谷幸利, "朝鮮語辞典" (1993), 小学館
- 和田学, "二つの語彙的緊密性―韓国語(と日本語)の複合動詞―", 山口大学文学会誌, 61, pp.83~104 (2011), 山口大学文学会
- 和田学, "韓国語の語彙的複合動詞", 九州大学言語学論集, 32, pp.249~266 (2011), 九州大学大学院人文科学研究院言語学研究室