본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

성년후견법의 시행준비작업상의 몇 가지 이론적, 실천적 문제

Some Theoretical and Practical Issues arising from Preparation Work for the Implementation of the new adult guardianship system

1

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

As of July 2013, a new adult guardianship, which is based on a different perspective from the current ‘judicial declaration of legal incapacity’ regime, comes into force. Even though the protected person who will be the guardian service user, potential guardian, and relevant officers including family court judges are not familiar with the new system, the preparation work for the implementation of the new system seems not to have been in concert. But for the coordinated preparation work, the new system would be reduced to the change of appearance of the current system. This paper deals with some theoretical and practical issues, with view to enhancing the understanding by relevant officers and academics of the new adult guardianship system. In this respect, the close relation of the new system with UN Convention of Rights of Persons With Disabilities and its implications are dealt with, because the new Korean adult guardianship was conceived to discharge the state responsibilities imposed by CRPSD on countries ratifying it. Then, some issues related to two draft Acts, draft Act of revising the Family Court Procedure Act and that of Guardianship Registration, pending the deliberation of the Parliament are dealt with, whereby whether such Acts appropriately reflect principles of the new Adult Guardianship Act(revised Korean Civil Code) is reviewed. Closely related to such issues, the scope of personal care and the criteria of the assessment of capacity to make decisions in relation to personal care matters are dealt with. Lastly, this paper suggests that guardianship service be provided for persons with low income as a kind of welfare service.

Abstract

As of July 2013, a new adult guardianship, which is based on a different perspective from the current ‘judicial declaration of legal incapacity’ regime, comes into force. Even though the protected person who will be the guardian service user, potential guardian, and relevant officers including family court judges are not familiar with the new system, the preparation work for the implementation of the new system seems not to have been in concert. But for the coordinated preparation work, the new system would be reduced to the change of appearance of the current system. This paper deals with some theoretical and practical issues, with view to enhancing the understanding by relevant officers and academics of the new adult guardianship system. In this respect, the close relation of the new system with UN Convention of Rights of Persons With Disabilities and its implications are dealt with, because the new Korean adult guardianship was conceived to discharge the state responsibilities imposed by CRPSD on countries ratifying it. Then, some issues related to two draft Acts, draft Act of revising the Family Court Procedure Act and that of Guardianship Registration, pending the deliberation of the Parliament are dealt with, whereby whether such Acts appropriately reflect principles of the new Adult Guardianship Act(revised Korean Civil Code) is reviewed. Closely related to such issues, the scope of personal care and the criteria of the assessment of capacity to make decisions in relation to personal care matters are dealt with. Lastly, this paper suggests that guardianship service be provided for persons with low income as a kind of welfare service.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 구상엽, "개정민법상 성년후견제도에 대한 연구 : 입법배경, 입법자의 의사 및 향후 과제를 중심으로", 박사, 법학과, pp.2012
  2. 김원태, "성년후견 등 심판절차에 관한 가사소송법 정비 방안에 대한 관견", 재산법연구, 28(2), pp.265~302 (2011), 한국재산법학회
  3. 김형석, "민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제", 가족법연구, 24(2), pp.111~166 (2010), 한국가족법학회
  4. 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제도에 있어서 신상보호 ―신상결정의 대행과 그 한계―", 가족법연구, 25(2), pp.147~198 (2011), 한국가족법학회
  5. UN장애인권리협약 국가보고서, "보건복지부", ~ (2011)
  6. 이영규, "성년후견인 양성방안", 성년후견지원본부 세미나 발표자료
  7. 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 개정방향", 민사법학, (42), pp.111~149 (2008), 한국민사법학회
  8. 제철웅, "영국법에서 의사결정무능력 성인의 보호제도의 역사적 전개와 2005년의 정신능력법의 특징", 비교사법, 17(4), pp.215~278 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
  9. 제철웅, "요보호성인의 인권존중의 관점에서 본 새로운 성년후견제도: 그 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방안", 민사법학, 56, pp.277~331 (2011), 한국민사법학회
  10. 성년후견제 시행을 위한 신상보호 관계법령 정비를 위한연구, "제철웅", 보건복지부, ~ (2012)
  11. 시민후견인 활성화방안 및 그 양성을 위한표준교육프로그램 및 교안 개발에 관한 연구, "제철웅", 보건복지부, ~ (2012)
  12. 현소혜, "성년후견제도 도입에 따른 관계법령의 개선방안 —특히 결격조항의 정비를 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 25(3), pp.143~184 (2011), 한국가족법학회
  13. Damrau, "Betreuungsrecht" (2010), Kohlhammer
  14. Dayton, "Advising the Elderly Client" (2013), Thomson Reuter
  15. Degener, "International Disability Law―A New Legal Subject on the Rise: The Interregional Experts’ Meeting in Hong KOng, December 13-17, 1999, In Disability Rights" (2005), Ashgate
  16. Erman, "BGB" (2004), Ascendorf Verlag
  17. Gostin, "Principles of Mental Health Law and Policy" (2010), OUP
  18. Jürgens, "Betreuungsrecht" (2010), C.H.Beck
  19. Menatal Incapacity, "Law Commission", ~, pp.report no 231 (1995)
  20. Quinn, "Next Steps: Toward a United Nations Treaty on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, In Disability Rights" (2005), Ashgate
  21. Rosch, "Das Neue Erwachsenenschutzrecht" (2011), Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag
  22. Monitoring the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Guidance for Human RIghts Monitors, "UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights", ~, pp.Professional Training Series No.17 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)