본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

성년후견제도 시행 10년과 새로운 입법적 과제

New Legislative Tasks with Reflection on the 10 Year Experience of the New Adult Guardianship System

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The main feature of the new adult guardianship system which came into force on 1st July 2013 is that it introduced social protection element to the area of statutory representation for the persons under guardianship, who used to be represented by family member guardians. But the new adult guardianship system has been exposed to critics that it functions as a barrier to exclude persons with dementia, developmental disabilities, or mental health issues from participation in social activities through legal actions rather than as a facilitator to promote them to do so. With this kind of concerns, the author conducted research on what new legislative tasks are required in the area of guardianship, or statutory representation, and enduring power of attorney so as for persons with decision making disabilities to be supported to participate in social activities through legal actions. As a result of the research, this paper suggests the reform of the Korean Civil Code and the enactment of a social service act the main purpose of which is to register the enduring power of attorney and assist and supervise the registered attorney. The following suggestions are among the reform of the Korean Civil Code. Firstly, this paper suggests that legal provisions on adult guardianship including those on the restriction of legal capacity of persons in the guardianship be abolished in the general part of the Civil Code; instead, the general legal provision on mental capacity shall be inserted there. It means that all the provisions on guardianship shall be placed in the family law part of the Korean Civil Code. Secondly, Adult guardianship shall be separately regulated from minor guardianship because both guardianships target at distinct purpose respectively and do not share common features except the provision on remuneration and reim- bursement of expenditure spent by guardians. Moreover, this paper sug- gests that adult guardians shall be appointed based on the principle of necessity: the power and authority of guardians and the duration of guardianship is subject to the extent which persons under guardianship are expected to be supported immediately and in the very near future. In this regard, persons under guardianship may be allowed to do legal transactions with the consent of guardians only in the case where such transactions are likely to harm the persons under guardianship. Thirdly, this paper suggests that legal provisions on contractual guardianship shall be abolished in the Civil Code, which caused negative effects on the future of still available enduring power of attorney without any special enactment. Lastly, this paper suggests that a special act, the main contents of which are to register the enduring power of attorney documents and other statutory representation power based on various social welfare statutes and supervise those legal representatives so as for elders and other persons suffering from illness and disabilities to cope with risks they face while legal transaction, shall be enacted. The tile of that statute can be “the Supported Decision Making of Elders and Persons with Disabilities Act”; the Ministry of Health and Welfare shall be the competent department, which establishes and maintains the agency, which shall be responsible for registration of legal representation and supervision of representatives.

Abstract

The main feature of the new adult guardianship system which came into force on 1st July 2013 is that it introduced social protection element to the area of statutory representation for the persons under guardianship, who used to be represented by family member guardians. But the new adult guardianship system has been exposed to critics that it functions as a barrier to exclude persons with dementia, developmental disabilities, or mental health issues from participation in social activities through legal actions rather than as a facilitator to promote them to do so. With this kind of concerns, the author conducted research on what new legislative tasks are required in the area of guardianship, or statutory representation, and enduring power of attorney so as for persons with decision making disabilities to be supported to participate in social activities through legal actions. As a result of the research, this paper suggests the reform of the Korean Civil Code and the enactment of a social service act the main purpose of which is to register the enduring power of attorney and assist and supervise the registered attorney. The following suggestions are among the reform of the Korean Civil Code. Firstly, this paper suggests that legal provisions on adult guardianship including those on the restriction of legal capacity of persons in the guardianship be abolished in the general part of the Civil Code; instead, the general legal provision on mental capacity shall be inserted there. It means that all the provisions on guardianship shall be placed in the family law part of the Korean Civil Code. Secondly, Adult guardianship shall be separately regulated from minor guardianship because both guardianships target at distinct purpose respectively and do not share common features except the provision on remuneration and reim- bursement of expenditure spent by guardians. Moreover, this paper sug- gests that adult guardians shall be appointed based on the principle of necessity: the power and authority of guardians and the duration of guardianship is subject to the extent which persons under guardianship are expected to be supported immediately and in the very near future. In this regard, persons under guardianship may be allowed to do legal transactions with the consent of guardians only in the case where such transactions are likely to harm the persons under guardianship. Thirdly, this paper suggests that legal provisions on contractual guardianship shall be abolished in the Civil Code, which caused negative effects on the future of still available enduring power of attorney without any special enactment. Lastly, this paper suggests that a special act, the main contents of which are to register the enduring power of attorney documents and other statutory representation power based on various social welfare statutes and supervise those legal representatives so as for elders and other persons suffering from illness and disabilities to cope with risks they face while legal transaction, shall be enacted. The tile of that statute can be “the Supported Decision Making of Elders and Persons with Disabilities Act”; the Ministry of Health and Welfare shall be the competent department, which establishes and maintains the agency, which shall be responsible for registration of legal representation and supervision of representatives.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 구상엽, "개정민법상 성년후견제도에 대한 연구 : 입법배경, 입법자의 의사 및 향후 과제를 중심으로", 박사, 법학과, pp.2012
  2. 장애인권리협약 이행에 관한 실태조사, "임성택", 국가인권위원회, ~ (2018)
  3. 킴벌리 데이튼, "세계의 후견제도" (2018), 율곡출판사
  4. 행위무능력제도의 재검토―성년후견 도입을 중심으로, "제철웅", 법무부, ~ (2007)
  5. 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 개정방향", 민사법학, (42), pp.111~149 (2008), 한국민사법학회
  6. 제철웅, "영국법에서 의사결정무능력 성인의 보호제도의 역사적 전개와 2005년의 정신능력법의 특징", 비교사법, 17(4), pp.215~278 (2010), 한국사법학회[DOI]
  7. 제철웅, "민법 제755조의 미성년자의 법정의무자의 책임에 관한 비판적 검토", 판례실무연구, XI 하 (2014)
  8. 제철웅, "유엔 장애인권리협약의 관점에서 본 한국 성년후견제도의 현재와 미래", 가족법연구, 28(2), pp.205~244 (2014), 한국가족법학회
  9. 제철웅, "성년후견과 지속적 대리 - 의사결정능력 장애인의 보호에서 인권존중으로 -", 법조, 66(2), pp.76~122 (2017), 법조협회[DOI]
  10. 제철웅, "국친사상의 변화와 소년법 보호처분절차의 개선방향", 비교사법, 29(4), pp.307~336 (2022), 한국사법학회[DOI]
  11. 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 도입논의와 영국의 정신능력법의 시사점", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.275~310 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  12. 제철웅, "발달장애인 대상 공공부조 지원의 효과성 제고를 위한 재산관리 지원서비스 도입의 필요성", 법학논총, 37(4), pp.299~335 (2020), 법학연구소[DOI]
  13. 박현정, "아일랜드의 후견제도의 개혁 입법 - 지원의사결정법을 중심으로", 민사법학, 95, pp.381~418 (2021), 한국민사법학회[DOI]
  14. 싱가포르와 독일의 성년후견 지원정책연구: 공공후견청·성년후견청 운영을 중심으로, "제철웅", 법무부, ~ (2017)
  15. 장영인, "보호대상아동의 사회적 양육 관련 법제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 가족법연구, 34(1), pp.123~158 (2020), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
  16. 제철웅, "노년기, 자기결정권" (2023), 나남
  17. 장애인권리협약의 국내적 이행을 위한 실태조사, "차선자", 국가인권위원회, ~ (2010)
  18. "성년후견제도 시행 10년, 앞으로 나아갈 길", 후견신탁연구센터, 사회복지법제학회, pp.온율, 한양대법학연구소 공동학술대회[DOI]
  19. 赤沼康弘, "日本の成年後見制度の槪要と特色, 新·アジア家族法三國會議編, 成年後見制度" (2014), 日本加除出版社
  20. Ruth D-Whyte, "My Excellent Child", CIEP, ~ (2021)
  21. D. Fina, "The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Kennedy and Grubb, the Medical Law Text and Materials", ~ (1989)
  22. Law Commission, "Mentally Incapacitated Adults and Decision-Making: An Overview", Consultation Paper No. 119, ~ (1991)
  23. "Münchener Kommentar zum BGB, Familienrecht II" (2017), C. H. Beck
  24. Janet O’Sullivan, "The Law of Contract", pp.258~272 (2006), Oxford University Press
  25. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Bio-medical and Behavioural Research, "Deciding to Forego Life Sustaining Treatment: Ethical Medical and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions", ~ (1983)
  26. The New York State Law Revision Commission, "2007 Recommendation on Proposed Revisions to The General Obligations Law Power of Attorney", ~ (2007)
  27. UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, "Concluding observation, CRPD", C, CO, pp.2-3
  28. Joanna Wells, "Positive Discipline for Kids, Wryting", ~ (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)