UN장애인권리협약과 성년후견 패러다임의 전환—의사결정대행에서 의사결정지원으로—
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Paradigm Shift of Adult Guardianship —from substituted decision-making to supported decision-making—
1
조회
0
다운로드
44
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to make clear whether the Korean new Adult Guardianship be consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities faced with the Concluding Observation on the initial report of republic of Korea by UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In which the Committee provided the recommendation that korean government should approve the Ward’s legal capacity including the right to act for himself and change substituted decision-making to supported decision-making. As a result, it became clear that full guardianship type does not agree with Article 12 of the Convention because of a comprehensive authorization for full-guardians and generally limits the legal capacity of ward. The guardian’s power to consent to ward’s legal act might be consistent with the convention but is not with principle of self-determination and not effective to protect her/him. It is more desirable to apply the contractual guardianship and specific guardianship. Furthermore, the limitation of legal capacity of Ward should be abolished but approved the right of revocation of Disabilities but guardian, exercise of which could be supported by her/him. The concept of Disabilities’s right of revocation is inferred from the revocation by reason of mistake in Korean Civil Code. Also to establish Korea’s supported decision-making system, we can refer to The Representative Agreement Act by British Columbia in Canada and Supported decision-making model of Victory Law Commision in Australia and The Disability Discrimination Act and The Developmental Disabilities Act in Korea. This study is expected to be helpful in improving Korean adult guardianship system in future.
Abstract
This paper is to make clear whether the Korean new Adult Guardianship be consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities faced with the Concluding Observation on the initial report of republic of Korea by UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In which the Committee provided the recommendation that korean government should approve the Ward’s legal capacity including the right to act for himself and change substituted decision-making to supported decision-making. As a result, it became clear that full guardianship type does not agree with Article 12 of the Convention because of a comprehensive authorization for full-guardians and generally limits the legal capacity of ward. The guardian’s power to consent to ward’s legal act might be consistent with the convention but is not with principle of self-determination and not effective to protect her/him. It is more desirable to apply the contractual guardianship and specific guardianship. Furthermore, the limitation of legal capacity of Ward should be abolished but approved the right of revocation of Disabilities but guardian, exercise of which could be supported by her/him. The concept of Disabilities’s right of revocation is inferred from the revocation by reason of mistake in Korean Civil Code. Also to establish Korea’s supported decision-making system, we can refer to The Representative Agreement Act by British Columbia in Canada and Supported decision-making model of Victory Law Commision in Australia and The Disability Discrimination Act and The Developmental Disabilities Act in Korea. This study is expected to be helpful in improving Korean adult guardianship system in future.
참고문헌 (52)
- 국가인권위원회, "장애인권리협약해설집" (2007), 한학문화
- 법원행정처, "성년후견제도해설", ~ (2013)
- 김재형, "민법총칙 제9판" (2013), 박영사
- 김상용, "민법총칙" (2013), 삼영사
- 김학동, "민법총칙" (2013), 박영사
- 윤진수, "2013년 개정민법해설", 법무부, ~ (2013)
- 제철웅, "요보호성인의 인권존중의 관점에서 본 새로운 성년후견제도: 그 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방안", 민사법학, 56, pp.277~331 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "개정 민법상의 후견계약의 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방향 :후견대체제도의 관점을 중심으로", 민사법학, 66, pp.99~134 (2014), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "유엔 장애인권리협약의 관점에서 본 한국 성년후견제도의 현재와 미래", 가족법연구, 28(2), pp.205~244 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 제철웅, "성년후견제도 도입을 전후한 법환경의 변화와 법률가의 역할, 성년후견제도와 법률가의 역할", 사단법인 온율·한국성년후견학회 공동워크샵 자료집 (2014)
- 권오용, "성년후견제도와 장애인인권", 한국장애인인권포럼 웹진, 2013 가을호(제26호), ~ (2013)
- 박인환, "일본 메이지민법(총칙편: 인·능력)의 입법이유 분석", 민사법학, 54(1), pp.259~321 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제도의 시행과 결격조항 정비의 과제", 비교사법, 21(3), pp.1221~1254 (2014), 한국비교사법학회
- 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.31~74 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- Jürgens, "Kommentar Betreuungsrecht", C.H.Beck
- Werner Flume, "Das Rechtgeschäft" (1992), Springer-Verlag
- Claus-Wihelm Canaris, "Verstöss gegen das verfassngsrechtliche Übermassverbot im Recht der Geschäftsfähigkeit und im Schadenersatzrecht", JZ, pp.993~ (1987)
- Volker Lipp, "Guardianship and Autonomy: Foes or Friends?", Adult Guardianship Law for the 21st Century (proceeding of the First World Congress on Adult Guardianship Law 2010) (2013)
- Dagmar Brosey, "Der General Comment No.1 zu Art.12 der UN-BRK und die Umsetzung im deutschen Recht", Btprax(Betreuungsrechtliche Praxis), ~ (2014)
- 2010年成年後見世界会議組織委員会, "成年後見法における自律と保護(成年後見法世界会議講演録)" (2012), 日本評論社
- 廣中俊雄, "未定稿本 民法修正案(前三編)理由書" (1987), 有斐閣
- 梅謙次郞, "訂正増補 民法要義(卷之一)" (1909), 有斐閣書房
- "新版注釋民法" (1988), 有斐閣
- 於保不二雄, "民法總則講義" (1951), 有信堂
- 我妻永, "新訂民法總則" (2008), 岩波書店
- 幾代通, "民法總則" (1997), 靑林書院
- 四宮和夫, "民法總則" (1999), 弘文堂
- 山本敬三, "民法講義Ⅰ" (2001), 有斐閣
- 須永醇, "意思能力と行爲能力" (2010), 日本評論社
- 新井誠, "高齡社會の成年後見法(改訂版)" (1999), 有斐閣
- 新井誠, "成年後見と意思能力" (2002), 日本評論社
- 佐藤久夫, "障害の槪念, 槪說障害者權利條約" (2010), 法律文化社
- 熊谷士郞, "意思無能力法理の再檢討" (2003), 有信堂
- "ドイツ成年後見ハンドブック" (2000), 勁草書房
- 商事法務, "民法(債權關係) 部會資料集 第2集<第2卷>" (2013)
- 大河純夫, "明治民法における行為能力の制限-明治前期法曹法と民法典の編纂-", 立命館法学, (240) (1995)
- 鹿野菜穂子, "高齢者の生活と法" (1999), 有斐閣
- 上山泰, "ドイツ成年後見ハンドブック" (2000), 勁草書房
- 上山泰, "成年後見制度の新たなグランドデザイン" (2013), 法政大学出版部
- 上山泰, "制限行爲能力制度に基づく取消權の實效性", 筑波ロージャーナル, (14) (2013)
- "成年後見關係事件槪況" (2013)[URL]
- "成年後見關係事件槪況" (2000)[URL]
- "보건복지부장애인등록현황/("[URL]
- "보건복지부 발달장애인 성년후견지원사업 개요에 관하여는 2014년 발달장애인 공공후견 지원사업안내(보건복지부) 참조"[URL]
- "장애인권리협약 한국정부보고서(영문)"[URL]
- "제1차 한국 정부보고서에 관한 쟁점 목록"[URL]
- "유엔장애인권리위원회의 쟁점목록에 대한 한국 정부의 답변"[URL]
- "유엔장애인권리위원회 중국 국가보고서에 대한 감시의견"[URL]
- "유엔장애인권리위원회의 한국 정부보고서에 대한 감시의견"[URL]
- "유엔장애인권리위원회 일반평석 제1호"[URL]
- "독일성년후견통계" (2012)[URL]