유엔 장애인권리협약의 관점에서 본 한국 성년후견제도의 현재와 미래
Korean Adult Guardianship and Its Future Tasks: From the Perspective of UN Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities
2
조회
0
다운로드
51
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the new adult guardianship law came into force as from 1st July 2013, some of the most important changes are that volunteer citizens begin to serve as specific guardians for persons with impairment to decision making abilities, based on protecting public interests, and that contractual guardians, even though few, come to the guardianship service play ground. Especially with the implement of the new adult guardianship system, regard should be had to the basic principles that persons with impairment to decision making abilities have dignity as a person and that reasonable accommodation is to be provided for them so as to enjoy constitutional, civil and public rights and discharge their duties and responsibilities as a human being. In this regard, above all, every legal measure disqualifying their rights and powers under the name of protection should be stopped. Instead, it is urgently required that appropriate decision making supporters be provided as easily, simply, and efficiently as possible, and that supported decision making system be equipped so as for them to be integrated into the communities. Some solutions are as follows: firstly, alternatives to guardianship is to be preferred to guardianship. Preference of contractual guardianship over judicial guardianship is an application; secondly, social infrastructure and social environment where mentally and intellectually disabled persons live their life in the society are much more important than guardians and alternatives to guardianship are provided. As awareness of human rights becomes raised, so can the number of judicial guardianship users paradoxically increase. That being said, to keep the number of guardianship users to the level of 0.2% to 0.3% of the population can be desirable. In other words, more desirable is that most mentally and intellectually disabled persons resort to alternatives to guardianship. To reach such a target, it is necessary to rearrange the system of guardianship and alternatives to guardianship; one of such rearrangements is to establish a competent organization which will be in charge of whole system. Draft bills put forward since 17th to 18th period of parliament have contained many good seeds for such rearrangements, even tough insufficiently. The first anniversary of the new adult guardianship is the time to collect wisdom to improve such seeds and develop into a new system.
Abstract
Since the new adult guardianship law came into force as from 1st July 2013, some of the most important changes are that volunteer citizens begin to serve as specific guardians for persons with impairment to decision making abilities, based on protecting public interests, and that contractual guardians, even though few, come to the guardianship service play ground. Especially with the implement of the new adult guardianship system, regard should be had to the basic principles that persons with impairment to decision making abilities have dignity as a person and that reasonable accommodation is to be provided for them so as to enjoy constitutional, civil and public rights and discharge their duties and responsibilities as a human being. In this regard, above all, every legal measure disqualifying their rights and powers under the name of protection should be stopped. Instead, it is urgently required that appropriate decision making supporters be provided as easily, simply, and efficiently as possible, and that supported decision making system be equipped so as for them to be integrated into the communities. Some solutions are as follows: firstly, alternatives to guardianship is to be preferred to guardianship. Preference of contractual guardianship over judicial guardianship is an application; secondly, social infrastructure and social environment where mentally and intellectually disabled persons live their life in the society are much more important than guardians and alternatives to guardianship are provided. As awareness of human rights becomes raised, so can the number of judicial guardianship users paradoxically increase. That being said, to keep the number of guardianship users to the level of 0.2% to 0.3% of the population can be desirable. In other words, more desirable is that most mentally and intellectually disabled persons resort to alternatives to guardianship. To reach such a target, it is necessary to rearrange the system of guardianship and alternatives to guardianship; one of such rearrangements is to establish a competent organization which will be in charge of whole system. Draft bills put forward since 17th to 18th period of parliament have contained many good seeds for such rearrangements, even tough insufficiently. The first anniversary of the new adult guardianship is the time to collect wisdom to improve such seeds and develop into a new system.
참고문헌 (31)
- 구상엽, "개정민법상 성년후견제도에 대한 연구 : 입법배경, 입법자의 의사 및 향후 과제를 중심으로", 박사, 법학과, pp.2012
- 김정렬, "성년후견제도 도입의 의미와 준비해야 할 과제", 함께걸음, ~ (2011)
- 김형석, "민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제", 가족법연구, 24(2), pp.111~166 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.31~74 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 백승흠, "성년후견제도의 시행과 과제", 민사법의 이론과 실무, 15(1), pp.3~53 (2011), 민사법의 이론과 실무학회
- 제철웅, "영국법에서 의사결정무능력 성인의 보호제도의 역사적 전개와 2005년의 정신능력법의 특징", 비교사법, 17(4), pp.215~278 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
- 제철웅, "요보호성인의 인권존중의 관점에서 본 새로운 성년후견제도: 그 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방안", 민사법학, 56, pp.277~331 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "성년후견인의 민법 제755조의 책임- 그 정당성에 대한 비판적 검토 -", 법조, 61(7), pp.5~53 (2012), 법조협회[DOI]
- 제철웅, "성년후견법의 시행준비작업상의 몇 가지 이론적, 실천적 문제", 가족법연구, 27(1), pp.1~40 (2013), 한국가족법학회
- 제철웅, "개정 민법상의 후견계약의 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방향 :후견대체제도의 관점을 중심으로", 민사법학, 66, pp.99~134 (2014), 한국민사법학회
- 조한진, "미국의 장애인 권리옹호체계, 중증장애인 보호와 옹호(P&A) 시스템 방안 연구", 장애인 권리옹호체계 확립을 위한 국회 정책토론회(2014.2) 자료집 (2014)
- 장애인권리협약의 국내이행을 위한 실태조사, "차선자", 국가인권위원회, ~ (2010)
- "함께걸음 제26주년 창간 기념호", ~
- 현소혜, "성년후견제도 도입에 따른 관계법령의 개선방안 —특히 결격조항의 정비를 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 25(3), pp.143~184 (2011), 한국가족법학회
- Bamberg, "BGB 3 Bd", C.H.Beck
- The British Medical Association and the Law Society, "Assessment of Mental Capacity" (2010)
- Bundesamt für Justiz, "Betreuungsverfahren" (2013)
- Adult Guardianship and Court Data and Issues Results from an Online Survey, "Center for Elders and the Courts", ~ (2010)
- Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, "Draft General Comment on Article 12, CRPD", C, 4[DOI]
- K. Dayton, "Comparative Perspective on Adult Guardianship" (2014), Carolina Academic Press
- S. H. Hurme, "Defining and Assessing Capacity to Vote: the Effect of Mental Impairment on the Right of Voters", McGeorge Law Review, 38
- Jürgens, "Betreuungsrecht" (2010), C. H. Beck
- Lush, "Court of Protection Practice and Procedure in England and Wales", 비교사법 국제학술대회(2013.11.) 자료집 (2013)
- McHale, "Health Care Law" (2007), Sweet & Maxwell
- Mental Disability Advocacy Centre, "Legal Capacity in Europe", ~ (2013)
- National Research Council, "Improving the Social Security Disability Decision Process" (2007), National Academies Press
- Schauffler, "The Need for Improved Adult Guardianship Data", Caseload Highlights, 15(2) (2008)
- Guardianship Final Report 24, "Victorian Law Reform Commission", ~ (2012)
- Williams, "Comparative Perspectives on Adult Guardianship" (2014), Carolina Academic Press
- 黃詩淳, "成年後見制度の槪要と特色, 新アシア家族法三國會議", 2013年 11月 臺灣大會(輔仁大學) 資料集 (2013)
- 赤昭康弘, "成年後見制度の槪要と特色, 新アシア家族法三國會議", 年 11月 臺灣大會(輔仁大學) 資料集 (2013)