UTAH와 공존하는 반례의 성격: 한국어 대격 피동문의 경우
The Properties of the counterexamples co-existing with the UTAH: The Accusative Passive in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I first show that the adversative passive and the lexical accusative passive in Korean constitute genuine counterexamples to the UTAH in Baker (1988, 1997). Given that the systematic correspondence between lexical semantics and syntactic structure captured in terms of the UTAH might be the result of the bare output condition imposed by the C-I, the co-existence of the UTAH and its counterexamples would remain a mystery. As a solution to the mystery, I propose that the co-existence itself is possible or available since Merge is in principle optional and is possible between any syntactic objects. If this proposal is in the right direction, it shows that the Minimalist framework is valid and that Merge is a true syntactic mechanism irreducible to any interface system.
Abstract
In this paper, I first show that the adversative passive and the lexical accusative passive in Korean constitute genuine counterexamples to the UTAH in Baker (1988, 1997). Given that the systematic correspondence between lexical semantics and syntactic structure captured in terms of the UTAH might be the result of the bare output condition imposed by the C-I, the co-existence of the UTAH and its counterexamples would remain a mystery. As a solution to the mystery, I propose that the co-existence itself is possible or available since Merge is in principle optional and is possible between any syntactic objects. If this proposal is in the right direction, it shows that the Minimalist framework is valid and that Merge is a true syntactic mechanism irreducible to any interface system.
참고문헌 (42)
- 남수경, "조사 '을", 를'이 나타나는 피동문에 대하여, 2005, pp.41(1), 79~99[DOI]
- 박소영, "한국어 소유 피동문의 두 유형 - 소유물 격 교체와 피동화의 유형론", 國語學, (59), pp.67~102 (2010), 국어학회
- 연재훈, "한국어 구문 유형론" (2011), 태학사
- 유현경, "한국어에 심리타동사가 있는가?", 배달말, (34), pp.27~49 (2004), 배달말학회
- 유혜원, "‘-을", 를’이 나타나는 피동문 연구, 1999, pp.9, 205~227
- 를”의 연구, "국어 격조사 “을", pp.1988, 이광호
- 이정택, "목적이 있는 피동문에 관한 연구", 배달말, (32), pp.211~227 (2003), 배달말학회
- 최기용, "한국어 격과 조사의 생성 통사론" (2009), 한국문화사
- Baker, Mark, "Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Baker, Mark, "Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax", pp.73~137 (1997), Kluwer
- Choi, Young-Seok, "Possessor ascension and lexical passive", Studies in Modern Grammar, 21, pp.73~86 (2000)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Dowty, Davis, "Thematic proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
- Hale, Kenneth, "The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.53~109 (1993), MIT Press
- Hale, Kenneth, "Prolegomena to a theory of argument structure" (2002), MIT Press
- Harley, Heidi, "External arguments and the mirror principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v", Lingua, 125, pp.34~57 (2013)
- Hong, Ki-Sun, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics IV", pp.491~502 (1991), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Move! A minimalist theory of construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Jaeggli, Oswaldo, "Passive", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.587~633 (1986)
- 정현경, "On the Affected Construction in Korean", 생성문법연구, 26(2), pp.193~221 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Korean Linguistics 12, "Japanese", pp.2003, Kim, Hee-Soo
- Kim, Kyumin, "High applicatives in Korean causatives and passives", Lingua, 121, pp.487~510 (2011)
- Kim, Soowon, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics V", pp.368~378 (1993), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Kratzer, Angelika, "Phrase structure and the lexicon", pp.109~138 (1996), Kluwer
- Larsons, Richard, "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
- Maling, Joan, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics III", pp.297~308 (1989), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Maling, Joan, "Case assignment in the inalienable possession construction in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.37~68 (1992)
- Marantz, Alec, "Verbal argument structure: Events and participants", Lingua, 130, pp.152~168 (2013)
- Moon, Gui-Sun, "The predication operation and multiple subject constructions in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10, pp.239~263 (2000)
- Oshima, David, "Adversity and Korean", Japanese passives: Constructional analogy, 2006, pp.15, 137~166
- Park, Sang Doh, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics IX", pp.640~649 (2001), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Park, Sang Doh, "Parameters of passive constructions in English and Korean", Doctor, pp.2005
- Korean Linguistics 12, "Japanese", pp.2003, Park, Sang Doh
- Pylkkänen, Liina, "Introducing arguments" (2008), MIT Press
- Ramchand, Gillian, "Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax" (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Whitman, John, "Korean morphological passives", causatives, 1988, 714~728[DOI]
- Yeon, Jaehoon, "The Korean causative-passive construction revisited", Language Research, 27, pp.73~58 (1991)
- JaehoonYeon, "The causative-passive ambiguity and the notion of contiguity as a crucial factor in explaining the retained-object passive constructions", 언어학, (32), pp.199~222 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- Yeon, Jaehoon, "Korean grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning" (2003), Saffron Book
- Yoon, James Hye-Suk, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics III", pp.357~368 (1989), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Yoon, Jeong-Me, "The argument structure of relational nouns and inalienable possessor constructions in Korean", Language Research, 33, pp.231~265 (1997)