본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Non-oblique syntax for a dative experiencer in Korean

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper provides an analysis of a dative experiencer in Korean and argues that not all semantically oblique experiencers have the syntax of a PP. I argue that experiencers in Korean are not represented by a PP, and I show evidence that they behave differently from PPs. The properties of the Korean-type experiencers can be accounted for by assuming an applicative approach, as has been suggested in previous studies for a similar type of experiencers in other languages. In an applicative structure, an experiencer is introduced by an applicative head, and the applicative phrase merges externally to VP. The present study suggests that the syntax of experiencers can be heterogeneous, and that not all semantically similar arguments are mapped onto the same structural position. This counters a semantics-syntax mapping in the spirit of the Uniformity of Theta Assignment Hypothesis (UTAH) (Baker 1988), often assumed in the literature

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of a dative experiencer in Korean and argues that not all semantically oblique experiencers have the syntax of a PP. I argue that experiencers in Korean are not represented by a PP, and I show evidence that they behave differently from PPs. The properties of the Korean-type experiencers can be accounted for by assuming an applicative approach, as has been suggested in previous studies for a similar type of experiencers in other languages. In an applicative structure, an experiencer is introduced by an applicative head, and the applicative phrase merges externally to VP. The present study suggests that the syntax of experiencers can be heterogeneous, and that not all semantically similar arguments are mapped onto the same structural position. This counters a semantics-syntax mapping in the spirit of the Uniformity of Theta Assignment Hypothesis (UTAH) (Baker 1988), often assumed in the literature

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Adger, David, "Psych nouns and predication", Proceedings of the 36th North East Linguistic Society, pp.89~102 (2005), Amherst
  2. Arad, Maya, "VP-structure and the syntax-lexicon interface", PhD, pp.1998
  3. Baker, Mark C., "Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
  4. Baker, Mark C., "The polysynthesis parameter" (1997), Oxford University Press
  5. Baker, Mark C, "The End of Argument Structure? Syntax and Semantics 38", pp.43~74 (2012), Emerald
  6. Belletti, Adriana, "Psych-verbs and theta theory", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.291~352 (1988)
  7. Bouchard, Denis., "The semantics of syntax: A minimalist approach to grammar" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
  8. Butt, Miriam, "Theories of case" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  9. Choe, Hyon Sook, "Restructuring parameters and complex predicates -a transformational approach", PhD, pp.1988
  10. Chomsky, Noam, "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), The MIT Press
  11. Cuervo, M. Cristina, "Some datives are born, some are made", Selected proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, pp.26~37 (2010), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
  12. Cuervo, M. Cristina, "Datives at large", PhD, pp.2003
  13. Fernández-Soriano, Olga, "Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: Locative and dative subjects", Syntax, 2, pp.101~140 (1999)
  14. Gerdts, Donna, "Surface case and grammatical relations in Korean: The evidence from quantifier float", Studies in Language, 11, pp.181~197 (1987)
  15. Gerdts, Donna, "Korean psych construction: Advancement or retreat?", CLS 24: Papers from the 24 th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp.155~175 (1988), Chicago Linguistic Society
  16. Gerdts, Donna, "Non-nominative subjects in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean, 3, pp.235~247 (1989)
  17. Harris, Alice, "Georgian syntax: A study in relational grammar" (1981), Cambridge University Press
  18. Hong, Ki Sun, "Idiomatic expressions in Korean and argument structure", Language Research, 34, pp.547~573 (1998)
  19. Holmberg, Anders, "The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax" (1995), Oxford University Press
  20. Jackendoff, Ray, "Semantic structures" (1990), The MIT Press
  21. Jung, Yeun Jin, "Decomposing ditransitive verbs", Proceedings of SICGG, pp.101~120 (2004)
  22. Kim, Kyumin, "A unified analysis of existentials and psych-constructions in Korean as pseudo-transitives", Studia Linguistica, 40, pp.21~55 (2015)
  23. 김규민, "Phase based account of idioms and its consequences", 언어연구, 32(3), pp.631~670 (2015), 언어정보연구소
  24. Kim, Kyumin, "The end of Argument Structure?, Syntax and Semantics 38", pp.132~154 (2012), Emerald
  25. Kim, Kyumin, "High applicatives in Korean causatives and passives", Lingua, 121, pp.487~510 (2011)
  26. Kim, Yookyung, "A non-spurious account of ‘spurious’ Korean plurals", Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics, 303~323 (1994)
  27. Kim, Young Joo, "The syntax and semantics of Korean case: the interpretation between lexical and semantic levels of representation", PhD, pp.1990
  28. Kishimoto, Hideki, "Ditransitive idioms and argument structure", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, pp.141~179 (2008)
  29. Kuh, Hakan, "Plural copying in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean, 2, pp.239~250 (1987)
  30. Landau, Idan, "The locative syntax of experiencers" (2010), The MIT press
  31. Marantz, Alec, "Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions", Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, pp.113~150 (1993)
  32. Marantz, Alec, "No escape from syntax: don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon", Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, pp.201~225 (1997), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics
  33. Masullo, J. Masullo, "Incorporation and case theory in Spanish: A crosslinguistic perspective", PhD, pp.1992
  34. McCloskey, James, "Control and A-chains in Modern Irish", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.143~189 (1988)
  35. McFadden, Thomas, "The position of morphological case in the derivation: A study of syntax-morphology interface", PhD, pp.2004
  36. McGinnis, Martha, "Locality in A-movement", PhD, pp.1998
  37. Miyagawa, Shigeru, "Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, pp.1~38 (2004)
  38. Korean Linguistics, "Japanese", pp.2003, Park, Sang Doh
  39. Pylkkänen, Liina, "Argument introducers" (2008), The MIT press
  40. Schäfer, Floretin, "Two types of external argument licensing-the case of causers", Studia Linguistica, 66, pp.1~53 (2012)
  41. Song, Jae Jung, "The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus", Journal of Pragmatics, 27, pp.203~224 (1997)
  42. Svenonius, Peter, "Extending the extension condition to discontinuous Idioms", Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 5, pp.227~263 (2005)
  43. Ura, Hiroyuki, "Checking theory and dative subject construction in Japanese and Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, pp.233~254 (1999)
  44. Urushibara, Saeko, "Ey", Eykey: A postposition or a case marker?, 1991, pp.4, 421~431
  45. Woolford, Ellen, "Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.111~130 (2006)
  46. Yip, Moira, "Case in tiers", Language, 63, pp.217~250 (1987)
  47. Yoon, James Hye Suk, "Raising of Major Arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, pp.615~653 (2007)
  48. Yoon, James Hye Suk, "Non-nominative Subjects", pp.265~314 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
  49. Yoon, Jeong Me, "ECM and multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.369~382 (1989)
  50. Youn, Cheong, "A relational analysis of Korean multiple nominative constructions", pp.1990
  51. Zaenen Annie, "Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3, pp.441~483 (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)