한국어에서의 격 표지 실현과 격 인허
Morphological Case Realization and Case Licensing in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Given that in Korean, morphological cases appear on arguments, it is tempting to suppose that every Case licensing must be identified by a morphological case in this language. With this in mind, we reexamine the generalization on the distribution of morphological cases in Korean, proposed by Hong (1994), according to which morphological cases are obligatory on arguments in the specifier position, but optional on arguments in the complement position, and confirm that this generalization is essentially correct. So, non-appearance of morphological case on arguments in the complement position goes against the supposition that every Case licensing must be identified by a morphological case. Then, we raise a question about how non-case-marked arguments in the complement position can be identified as an argument. We assume, following Baker (1988), that there are four methods of PF identifying argument relationship, which are morphological case, verbal agreement, adjacency, and incorporation, and argue that non-case-marked arguments in the complement position are cases of adjacency or incorporation.
Abstract
Given that in Korean, morphological cases appear on arguments, it is tempting to suppose that every Case licensing must be identified by a morphological case in this language. With this in mind, we reexamine the generalization on the distribution of morphological cases in Korean, proposed by Hong (1994), according to which morphological cases are obligatory on arguments in the specifier position, but optional on arguments in the complement position, and confirm that this generalization is essentially correct. So, non-appearance of morphological case on arguments in the complement position goes against the supposition that every Case licensing must be identified by a morphological case. Then, we raise a question about how non-case-marked arguments in the complement position can be identified as an argument. We assume, following Baker (1988), that there are four methods of PF identifying argument relationship, which are morphological case, verbal agreement, adjacency, and incorporation, and argue that non-case-marked arguments in the complement position are cases of adjacency or incorporation.
참고문헌 (23)
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "Morphosyntax in Generative Grammar", pp.1~21 (1996), Hankuk Publishing Co
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "Linguistic Investigation: In honor of In-Seok Yang", pp.1~16 (1999), Hankuk Publishing Co
- 박정섭, "한국어의 격표지 실현과 이탈어 구문", 생성문법연구, 18(3), pp.415~438 (2008), 한국생성문법학회
- Baker, Mark C., "Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing" (1988), The University of Chicago Press
- Belletti, Adriana, "The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2", pp.16~51 (2004), Oxford University Press
- 최기용, "구조격 조사의 비출현: 구조격의 형태적 비실현", 생성문법연구, 17(2), pp.199~ (2007), 한국생성문법학회
- Choi, Kiyong, "hankwuke kyekkwa cosauy sayngsengthongsalon (Generative Syntax of Case and Particles in Korean)" (2009), Hankwukmwunhwasa
- Chomsky, Noam, "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use" (1986), Praeger
- Hong, Yong-Tcheol, "Théorie de l'incorporation et théorie du Cas: leurs implications sur la structure phrastique et sur la stucture du syntagme nominal en coréen", Doctor, pp.1992
- Hong, Yong-Tcheol, "yunghapilonkwa kyekcosa pwunpho (Incorporation theory and the distribution of case morphemes)", Studies in Generative Grammar, 4(1), pp.1~44 (1994)
- Hong, Yong-Tcheol, "hankwukeuy kyekcosa thallakkwa kyekcosa pwucay (Omission et absence de morphème casuel en coréen)", Enseignement de Langue et Littérature Françaises, 18, pp.295~314 (2004)
- 홍용철, "특수조사 “는”에 대한 통합적 분석", 생성문법연구, 15(3), pp.397~413 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "한국어 명사 외곽 수식어들의 어순과 명사구 구조", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.27~50 (2010), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Hong, Yong-Tcheol, "Sentence-initial non-Case-marked NPs in Korean", The Proceedings of the 2012 Meeting of the Korean Generative Grammar Circle, pp.31~44 (2012)
- 홍용철, "소유격 표지 “의”의 분포와 본질", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.321~345 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "명사구 내 보충어에의 격 표지 부재와 인접에 의한 가시성 조건 만족", 생성문법연구, 25(3), pp.603~629 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 홍용철, "고유 명사와 “의”의 의무적 출현: “의”가 수식어 표지라는 한 증거", 언어, 41(4), pp.761~779 (2016), 한국언어학회
- Kang, Beom-Mo, "Categories and meanings of Korean floating quantifiers – with some references to Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, pp.375~398 (2002)
- Non-Specificity Distinction and Scrambling Theory, "The Specificity", pp.1993, Kim, Dae-Bin
- Kim, Kwang-Sup, "(Anti-)connectivity", Doctor, pp.1998
- Kim, Yong-Ha, "Overt case and covert case in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 8, pp.177~240 (1998)
- Ko, Heejeong, "Asymmetries in Scrambling and Cyclic Linearization", Linguistic Inquiry, 38(1), pp.49~83 (2007)
- 고희정, "On the Typology of Small Clauses: Null Subject and Mode of Merge in Resultatives", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.347~375 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]