본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 수동구문과 사동구문: 어휘적 도출

Passive and Causative Constructions in Korean: Lexical Derivation

최준수
한국생성문법학회|2018.02|생성문법연구 (Studies in Generative Grammar)|제28권 제1호|pp. 1-68|DOI 10.15860/sigg.28.1.201802.1

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Voicecausativespassive morphemecausative morphemelexically derived predicatedirect passivesindirect passivesinchoativesCausativity.
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper explores the derivation of the constructions known as direct passives, indirect (or adverse) passives and causatives in Korean. In the literature, there are two major points generally accepted: 1) Korean has passive and causative morphemes, 2) these morphemes are syntactic functional categories which decides the Voice or Causativity of the construction. But I will provide a different analysis by arguing three points: 1) so-called passive and causative morphemes are not syntactic functional categories. 2) they combine, in a highly unpredictable way, with a predicate in the Lexicon but not in narrow syntactic components. 3) the function of these morphemes is to produce a lexically derived predicate through the modification of the argument structure or through the change of the Ɵ-role assigned to an external argument. In other words, I will put forward the hypothesis that Korean passive and causative predicates are lexically derived and that this language has no syntactic Voice and Causativity distinction. In the passage, we will see, as a by-product, that there is no inchoative construction in Korean.

Abstract

This paper explores the derivation of the constructions known as direct passives, indirect (or adverse) passives and causatives in Korean. In the literature, there are two major points generally accepted: 1) Korean has passive and causative morphemes, 2) these morphemes are syntactic functional categories which decides the Voice or Causativity of the construction. But I will provide a different analysis by arguing three points: 1) so-called passive and causative morphemes are not syntactic functional categories. 2) they combine, in a highly unpredictable way, with a predicate in the Lexicon but not in narrow syntactic components. 3) the function of these morphemes is to produce a lexically derived predicate through the modification of the argument structure or through the change of the Ɵ-role assigned to an external argument. In other words, I will put forward the hypothesis that Korean passive and causative predicates are lexically derived and that this language has no syntactic Voice and Causativity distinction. In the passage, we will see, as a by-product, that there is no inchoative construction in Korean.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. Alexiadou, Artemis, "Passive", lingbuzz, 2017
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis, "The Syntactic Construction of Two Non-Active Voices; Passive and Middle", Journal of Linguistics, 48, pp.1~34 (2012)
  3. Baker Mark, "Passive Arguments Raised", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.219~251 (1989)
  4. Bruening, Benjamin, "Ditransitive Asymmetries and a Theory of Idiom Formation", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.519~562 (2010)
  5. Bruening, Benjamin, "By phrases in Passives and Nominals", Syntax, 16, pp.1~41 (2013)
  6. 최진선, "On the Status of Dative NPs in Korean Causatives and Passives", 언어와언어학, (62), pp.309~334 (2014), 언어연구소
  7. 최기용, "UTAH와 공존하는 반례의 성격: 한국어 대격 피동문의 경우", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.37~60 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  8. Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  9. Collins, Chris, "A Smuggling Approach to the Passive in English", Syntax, 8, pp.81~120 (2005)
  10. Collins, Chris, "On the Implicit Argument in the Short Passive", lingbuzz, 2017
  11. Hale, Ken, "The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.53~109 (1993)
  12. Some Key Features of Distributed Morphology, "Halle Maurice", MIT, 275~288, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21 (1994)
  13. Harley, Heidi, "Possession and the Double Object Construction", Yearbook of Linguistic Variation, 2, pp.29~68 (2002)
  14. Harley, Heidi, "Semantics in Distributed Morphology", lingbuzz, 2008
  15. Hong, Ki Sun, "The Passive Construction and Case in Korean", Proceedings of 17th BLS, pp.130~143 (1991)
  16. Ishizuka, Tomoko, "Toward a Unified Analysis of Passives in Japanese; A Cartographic Minimalist Approach", PhD, pp.2010
  17. Ishizuka, Tomoko, "Subsuming Indirect Passives under Direct Passives", Proceeding of 12th SICGG, pp.211~230 (2010)
  18. Jaeggli, Osvaldo, "Passive", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.587~622 (1982)
  19. 정현경, "Korean First Phase Syntax as Non-Voice-bundling", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.201~230 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  20. 정현경, "On the Affected Construction in Korean", 생성문법연구, 26(2), pp.193~221 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  21. 김재민, "A Typological Study of Anticausative, Middle and Medio-Passive Constructions", 현대문법연구, (81), pp.65~89 (2014), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  22. Kyumin Kim, "Two Types of Inchoatives in Korean.", 어학연구, 45(2), pp.231~255 (2009), 언어교육원
  23. Kim, Kyu Min, "High Applicatives in Korean Causatives and Passives", Lingua, 121, pp.487~510 (2011)
  24. 김규민, "Phase based account of idioms and its consequences", 언어연구, 32(3), pp.631~670 (2015), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  25. Kitakawa Yoshihisa, "Passive in Japanese", ms, pp.1992
  26. Kratzer, Angelika, "Phrase Structure and the Lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996)
  27. Landau, Idan, "The Explicit Syntax of Implicit Arguments", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.357~388 (2010)
  28. 이주은, "Escape Hatch Effects and Anti-locality in Passivization of Ditransitive Verb Phrases", 생성문법연구, 15(1), pp.53~75 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
  29. 이주은, "A Critical Review of Analyses of Indirect Passives", 생성문법연구, 16(2), pp.269~285 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
  30. 이정택, "목적이 있는 피동문에 관한 연구", 배달말, (32), pp.211~227 (2003), 배달말학회
  31. No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon, "Marantz, Alec", University of Pennsylvania, 201~225, pp.University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (1997)
  32. 남수경, "조사 '을", 를'이 나타나는 피동문에 대하여, 2005, pp.41(1), 79~99[DOI]
  33. 남수경, "國語 被動에 대한 考察", 어문연구(語文硏究), 35(2), pp.89~114 (2007), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
  34. Oshima, David, "Adversity and Korean", Japanese Passives; Constructional Analogy, 2006, pp.15, 137~166
  35. Park, Sang Doh, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IX", pp.640~649 (2001)
  36. 박상도, "Korean Passive Constructions without Movement from the Internal Argument Position", 언어과학연구, (67), pp.65~84 (2013), 언어과학회
  37. Park Sang Doh, "Direct Movement Passives in Korean and Japanese", Japanese, 2003, pp.12, 307~321
  38. 박소영, "한국어 소유 피동문의 두 유형 - 소유물 격 교체와 피동화의 유형론", 國語學, (59), pp.67~102 (2010), 국어학회[DOI]
  39. 박소영, "태의 교체와 관용어 해석 원리", 현대문법연구, (69), pp.1~20 (2012), 현대문법학회
  40. 박소영, "한국어 피동문에 나타나는 격 교체의 비대칭성에 대하여", 國語學, (67), pp.195~222 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
  41. Postal, Paul, "Skeptical Linguistic Essays" (2004), Oxford University Press
  42. 심창용, "Accusative Case in Passives", 생성문법연구, 16(3), pp.515~533 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
  43. 심창용, "On the Passive-Causative Ambiguity", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.655~677 (2008), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  44. Song, Chang Seon, "The properties of the Passive Suffix in Modern Korean", The Journal of Korean Language and Literature Education, 36, pp.129~148 (2004)
  45. Song, Chang Seon, "On the Function and Meaning 0f ‘a", eo jita’ in Modern Korean, 2005, pp.27, 1~24
  46. 송창선, "피동문에 나타나는 ‘을", 를’의 문법적 기능, 2009, pp.(284), 107~131[DOI]
  47. Atypical Argument Structure of the HI Passive in Korean, "Son, Min Jeong", U Penn, 335~348, pp.U Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 12 (2006)
  48. NamSunSong, "A Comparative Study of Japanese Passive and Korean Passive", 언어학, (32), pp.167~198 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  49. 최준수, "우리말 예외격 구문과 예변 논항", 현대문법연구, (71), pp.1~30 (2013), 현대문법학회
  50. 최준수, "우리말 예변 논항과 불연속 표현", 현대문법연구, (74), pp.1~36 (2013), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  51. Um, Hye Young, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VI", pp.413~428 (1995)
  52. 여승주, "Distinguishing Periphrastic Causatives from Morphological Causatives", 생성문법연구, 15(2), pp.231~249 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
  53. 여승주, "On the Causee Argument in Japanese and Korean Analytic Causative Construction", 생성문법연구, 16(2), pp.231~248 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
  54. JaehoonYeon, "The causative-passive ambiguity and the notion of contiguity as a crucial factor in explaining the retained-object passive constructions", 언어학, (32), pp.199~222 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  55. 유승섭, "국어 접미파생 사동문의 논항 형성 고찰", 한글, (276), pp.77~104 (2007), 한글학회
  56. 유승섭, "국어 접미파생 피동문의 논항 형성과 구조에 대하여", 한글, (303), pp.77~113 (2014), 한글학회

관련 논문AI추천

한국어 사동문의 통사론적 도출박소영한국언어학회 · 언어2012 · 제37권 제3호On the Causative-Passive Correlation in Korean조진우한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2020 · 제30권 제4호Korean Passive Constructions without Movement from the Internal Argument Position박상도언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2013 · 제67호On the Affected Construction in Korean정현경한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2016 · 제26권 제2호Passive and Causative Serial Verb Constructions in Korean이경미언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2021 · 제97호한국어 이중피동구문의 핵어문법적 분석박희문한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2009 · 제25권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Bound Noun swu in Korean, from a Perspective of Grammaticalization: A Reply to Chung (2017)김태식pp. 69-90Coordinated Multiple Wh-questions in Wh-in-situ Languages: A Mono-Clausal Movement Analysis정연진pp. 91-125Not all CPs Are Phases!박동우pp. 127-142Movement of Null Determiner in English Clausal Complement하승완pp. 143-160유연 영 주제어와 영 논항홍용철pp. 161-186
원문 보기