본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

다중감각 표현의 비유적 의미구성

On the figurative meaning construction of multisensory expressions

임태성
담화·인지언어학회 (The Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea)|2020.02|담화와 인지 (Discourse and Cognition)|제27권 제1호|pp. 247-270|DOI 10.15718/discog.2020.27.1.247

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

conceptual blendingsensationfigurative expressionmeaning constructionmultisensory expression
주제분류언어학

초록

This study examined the meaning construction of figurative multisensory expressions through conceptual blending scheme. Sensation is one of our basic experiences, and inter-sensory combination is also one of the involuntary physical experiences. This multisensory language, which is a combination of senses, is divided into vocabulary, expression, and figurative expansion. The figurative multisensory expressions are largely grouped into two types; one is a type of man-related multisensory expressions and the other is a type of non-man-related multisensory expressions. First, it is revealed that the former type stands for characters, attitudes, and emotions of persons. Especially, in a figurative multisensory expression describing the characters of men as of rough taste, such as ‘The male is rough taste (The male has a positive personality)’, the sense of positiveness is newly emerged from the sense of ‘rough taste’. And in other expressions describing the characters of men as of soft taste, such as ‘The male is soft taste (The male has a positive personality)’, the sense of positiveness is projected from the original sense of soft taste with no change. Second, it is found that the non-man-related multisensory type stands for environment of things. Especially, in figurative multisensory expressions describing a culture as of cool scent, such as ‘The culture is cool scent (The culture is positive)’, the sense of positiveness is newly emerged from the sense of cool scent.

Abstract

This study examined the meaning construction of figurative multisensory expressions through conceptual blending scheme. Sensation is one of our basic experiences, and inter-sensory combination is also one of the involuntary physical experiences. This multisensory language, which is a combination of senses, is divided into vocabulary, expression, and figurative expansion. The figurative multisensory expressions are largely grouped into two types; one is a type of man-related multisensory expressions and the other is a type of non-man-related multisensory expressions. First, it is revealed that the former type stands for characters, attitudes, and emotions of persons. Especially, in a figurative multisensory expression describing the characters of men as of rough taste, such as ‘The male is rough taste (The male has a positive personality)’, the sense of positiveness is newly emerged from the sense of ‘rough taste’. And in other expressions describing the characters of men as of soft taste, such as ‘The male is soft taste (The male has a positive personality)’, the sense of positiveness is projected from the original sense of soft taste with no change. Second, it is found that the non-man-related multisensory type stands for environment of things. Especially, in figurative multisensory expressions describing a culture as of cool scent, such as ‘The culture is cool scent (The culture is positive)’, the sense of positiveness is newly emerged from the sense of cool scent.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 김동환, "개념적 혼성과 의미구성 양상", 언어과학연구, 21, pp.45~68 (2002), 언어과학회
  2. 김동환, "인지언어학과 개념적 혼성 이론" (2013), 박이정
  3. 김동환, "개념적 혼성에서 환유의 작용 방식에 관한 연구", 영어영문학, 22(1), pp.141~162 (2017), 미래영어영문학회
  4. 김용철, "공감각의 형성요인에 관한 연구 : 촉감, 음감, 색감의 관계성을 중심으로", 박사, 광고홍보학, pp.2005
  5. 김준기, "온도어의 의미 고찰", 어문학, 78, pp.21~45 (2002), 한국어문학회
  6. 김중현, "국어 공감각 표현의 인지 언어학적 연구", 담화와 인지, 8(22), pp.23~46 (2001)
  7. 나익주, "인지문법: 언어 본질의 탐구는 일반 인지능력을 떠날 수 없다", 담화와 인지, 24(1), pp.113~118 (2017), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  8. 朴甲洙, "韓國現代詩의 共感覺的表現: 男女詩人의 共感覺的轉移", 아시아여성연구, 16, pp.145~179 (1977)
  9. 박상진, "국어 감각형용사의 의미 변천 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2012
  10. 석수영, "한·중 감정 표현의 개념화 양상 - 미각어를 중심으로 -", 언어과학연구, (68), pp.191~214 (2014), 언어과학회
  11. 李乙煥, "國語意味變化의 原因硏究", 어문학, 3, pp.7~38 (1963)
  12. 李乙煥, "國語意味論: 序說" (1975), 玄文社
  13. 이지희, "국어 촉각 형용사 연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2007
  14. 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
  15. 임지룡, "감각어의 의미 확장 양상과 특성", 국어교육연구, (63), pp.335~372 (2017), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
  16. 임태성, "이동의 가상적 확장에 대한 연구", 담화와 인지, 25(3), pp.49~67 (2018), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  17. 임태성, "다중감각어의 환유적 접근", 국어교육연구, (71), pp.39~70 (2019), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
  18. 정수진, "국어 감각명사의 의미 확장에 대한 인지언어학적 접근 국어 감각명사의 의미 확장에 대한 인지언어학적 접근", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (60), pp.271~290 (2012), 한민족어문학회[DOI]
  19. 정수진, "개념적 혼성 이론에 기초한 한국어 의미구성", 어문학, (116), pp.81~102 (2012), 한국어문학회
  20. 정인수, "국어 형용사의 공감각적 전이 연구", 현대문법연구, 11, pp.163~180 (1997)
  21. 정재윤, "우리말 감각어 연구" (1989), 한신출판사
  22. 천시권, "溫度語彙의 相關體系", 국어 교육 연구, 12, pp.1~14 (1980)
  23. 千時權, "국어의미론" (1971), 형설출판사
  24. 崔昌烈, "共感覺的意味의 轉移", 韓國言語文學, 11, pp.107~138 (1973)
  25. 최창렬, "말과 의미" (1999), 집문당
  26. Bierwiaczonek, Boguslaw, "Metonymy in language, thought and brain" (2013), Equinox
  27. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, "Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing", Pragmatics and Cognition, 13(2), pp.433~438 (2005)
  28. Coulson, Seana, "Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing", pp.51~79 (2003), John Benjamins
  29. Cytowic, Richard E, "Synesthesia : Phenomenology and neuropsychology", Psyche, 2(10), pp.2~10 (1995)
  30. Cytowic, Richard E., "Synesthesia: A union of the senses" (2002), The MIT Press
  31. Cytowic, Richard E., "Synesthesia" (2018), The MIT Press
  32. Driver, Jon, "Multisensory perception: Beyond modularity and convergence", Current Biology, 10, pp.R731~R735 (2000)
  33. Evans, Vyvyan, "인지언어학 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
  34. Fauconnier, Gilles, "Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language" (1994), The MIT Press
  35. Fauconnier, Gilles, "Mapping in thought and language" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  36. Fauconnier, Gilles, "Metonymy in language and thought", pp.77~90 (1999), John Benjamins
  37. Fauconnier, Gilles, "The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities" (2002), Basic Books
  38. Goldstein, E. Bruce, "감각과 지각" (2012), 센게이지러닝코리아
  39. Johnson, Mark, "2012. 몸의 의미: 인간 이해의 미학" (2012), 東文選
  40. Langacker, Ronald W., "인지문법" (2014), 박이정
  41. Macaluso, Emiliano, "Selective spatial attention in vision and touch: Unimodal and multimodal mechanisms revealed by PET", Journal of Neurophysiology, 83(5), pp.3062~3075 (2000)
  42. Peirsman, Yves, "Metonymy as a prototypical category", Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), pp.269~316 (2006)
  43. Ramachandran, Vilayanur S., "Synaesthesia - A window into perception, thought and language", Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), pp.3~34 (2001)
  44. Ramachandran, Vilayanur S., "Hearing colors, tasting shapes", Scientific American, 288(5), pp.53~59 (2003)
  45. Slingerland, Edward, "What science offers the humanities: Integrating body and culture" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  46. Tyler, Andrea, "인지언어학과 제2언어 학습" (2015), 로고스라임
  47. Ullmann, Stephen, "의미론의 원리" (1979), 탑출판사

관련 논문AI추천

다중감각어의 환유적 접근임태성국어교육학회(since1969) · 국어교육연구2019 · 제71호인지언어학 관점의 ‘辣’계열 어휘의 공감각 표현 연구채춘옥한국중국문화학회 · 중국학논총2024 · 제82호감각어의 의미 확장 양상과 특성임지룡국어교육학회(since1969) · 국어교육연구2017 · 제63호개념혼성이론을 통해 본 通感의 의미구성이승훈한국중국어문학회 · 중국문학2020 · 제105권 중국어 ‘酸’과 ‘辣’ 계열 성어의 개념혼성 구조 연구채춘옥한국중국언어문화연구회 · 한중언어문화연구2025 · 제78호한중 식품 광고에 나타난 공감각적 은유 양상이선희영남중국어문학회 · 중국어문학2014 · 제65호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

차용어휘에 대한 화용적 접근 - ‘리스펙’을 중심으로강현숙pp. 1-20Response Particles to Would You Mind Questions김미자pp. 21-50‘进来’와 ‘들어오다’의 진행상 구현에 대한 원근화법적 해석김윤정pp. 51-74국어 구어 담화에서 부사 ‘다’ 연구김현지pp. 75-102인지욕구와 읽기처리에 관련된 인지능력 및 읽기수행과의 관계김미숙, 노수림, 김예슬pp. 103-121
원문 보기