중국 위진남북조시대 金蟬紋璫과 金步搖冠飾의 시원과 전개
The Origin and Development of Gold Cap Ornament with Cicala figure and Gold Boyo("step-sway") Ornaments in the Era of the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties of China
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
한대의 근간을 둔 위진남북조시대의 복식제도에서 특징적인 면은 북방이민족들의 금제장신구에 대한 취향이 반영되어 금제 冠飾이 관모와 결합되는 양상이라고 할 수 있다. 山形 금제장식판에 매미모양의 蟬文이 장식된 금선문당은 채옹이 지은 『獨斷』 등의 漢代 문헌에서 武官이 쓰는 관의 요소로 확인이 되나 실물은 4세기 중반으로 편년되는 동진의 南京大北園墓에서 처음 발견되었다. 남경대북원묘는 동진의 황실묘일 가능성이 제기되어, 황제도 금선문당을 착용하였을 가능성을 엿볼 수 있다. 매미와 산이라는 모티프로 구성된 금선문당은 중국 고유의 道敎思想인 昇仙과 관계가 있는 것으로 파악되었다. 금선문당은 남조지역 이외에도 북조에서도 일정하게 확산되는 양상이 확인된다. 이는 북방이민족들이 남조의 관제를 수용하면서 생긴 양상인데, 북조에서는 여성이나 어린아이의 무덤에서도 금선문당이 확인되어 흥미롭다. 이는 본래 북방에 연원을 가진 무관이 북조에서 유행되면서 일어난 현상으로 파악된다. 즉 금선문당이 부착된 관을 전 계층에서 착용하면서 생긴 양상인 것이다. 걸으면 흔들리는 관인 步搖冠 역시 문헌에서는 漢代에 여성의 머리 장식으로 처음 등장한다. 금제보요관이 유행하게 된 것은 모용선비와 탁발선비의 관식으로 사용된 이후이다. 여성의 首飾으로 사용된 한대의 보요관은 북방이민족인 선비족의 보요관과는 재질이나 형식면에서 다른 계통으로 판단된다. 위진남북조시대에 보요관이 전폭적으로 유행하게 된 것은 북방이민족인 모용선비에 의해서였다. 모용선비묘장에서 보요관은 3세기 단계에서 확인되며 4세기 전반까지 집중적으로 출토된다. 그리고 前燕, 後燕, 北燕이 도읍하였던 遼寧省 朝陽에서 주로 출토되는 지역적 특징이 보인다. 보요관이 거의 사라지는 5세기 초반 풍소불묘에서는 금선문당과 보요관이 결합되는 양상을 보인다. 4-5세기에 이르면 일정하게 북조와 남조의 관식이 서로 영향을 미치면서 발전한다. 선비족 특유의 보요관에 동진양식의 금선문당이 더해지고, 남조의 금제장식에 북방 보요가 더해지는 양상이 전개되는 것이다. 이 단계에서는 매미의 요소는 사라지고 산형장식으로 간략화 되는데, 이와 같인 남북조 융합양식이 고구려, 백제, 신라가 병립하였던 삼국시대 우리나라 관식에 일정하게 채용된다.
Abstract
The Wei, Jin and Southern and Northern Dynasties was a period in the history of China that lasted from 220 to 581 AD. Though an age of civil war and political chaos, it was also a time of flourishing arts and culture. There were numerous movements of people within China. The movement were occasioned by differrent circimstances, and the end results were the redistribution and mixing of entnic groups. This study analyzed the exchange aspects of the Han tribe and the northern local gentries through examining the origins and development process of traditional ornament of the Han Chinese, the gold cap ornament with cacala figure(金蟬紋璫) and the Gold Boyo(金步搖"step-sway). Characteristic thing in the costume system of the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties of China, which was based on the Han dynasty, is that gold diadem is combined with official hat by reflecting the taste of northern migrants' gold ornaments. The gold cap ornament with cacala figure is identified with military hat in the Han literature entitled Arbitrariness by Chaong. The real object was discovered in the Namgeongdaebukwon(南京大北園) tomb of Dongjin, recorded chronologically in the mid 4th century first. Namgeongdaebukwon tomb is estimated to be the tomb of the imperial family of Dongjin, and emperor also wore the gold cap ornament with cacala figure, which was composed of motifs with cicada and mountain in association with the taoism of China. The gold cap ornament with cacala figure is identified to have been spread in the northern region as well as the southern region uniformly. This phenomenon occurred because northern migrants accepted the coronet system of the southern region. In the case of the northern region, it is intriguing that the gold cap ornament with a cacala figure is identified in the tombs of women and children. It is assumed that this happened due to Wuguan are originated from the northern region. In other words, this shows the aspect that people of all classes wore Wuguan that attaches the gold cap ornament with a cacala figure. Gold Boyog(金步搖), which is shaky while walking, emerged as women's head ornaments on the Han dynasty, according to literatures. The popularity of Boyogwan(步搖冠) began after using diadem ornaments of Murong Xianibei(慕容 鮮卑) and Tuoba Xianbei(拓拔 鮮卑). Boyogwan of Han dynasty, which was used as women's ornaments, is judged to be a different system from Boyogwan of northern immigrants in terms of quality and form. Boyogwan became popular in the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties of China by Murong Xianibei, northern immigrants. This name was originated from the fact that these people liked wearing boyogwan, usually worn by women. The Boyongwan, which was used by Murong Xianibei was different from that of Han dynasty, which puts its technical origin in Boyogwan of Central Asia. Boyo technique, made by cutting thin gold plate, affected Boyo ornaments of women in the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, and Tang and Song dynasties. Boyogwan in Murong Xianibei tomb was identified in the stage of the third century, and these diadem ornaments were excavated intensively before the first half term of the fourth century. In addition, these ornaments have the regional characteristics in that they were chiefly discovered in Zhaoyang, which was the capital of the Former, Later, and Southern Yan. In the era of early 5th century, which was the disappearing time of Boyogwan, the gold cap ornament with cacala figure and boyogwan were combined in the Pungsobul(馮素弗) tomb. In the fourth century and fifth century, the gold hat ornaments of the northern region and southern region exchanged mutual effect. The gold cap ornament with the cacala figure of Dongjin style was added to unique Boyogwan of Xianibei, and northern Boyo was added to the gold ornaments of the southern region. In this stage, the element of cicada was vanished and simplified as a mountain style ornament. Likewise, the fusion style of southern and northern regions were used in the gold hat ornaments of Korea in the three kingdom period of Goguryeo, Baekje, and Silla uniformly.
참고문헌 (47)
- 강인욱, "고고학으로 본 흉노의 발생과 분포", 문화재, (36), pp.105~156 (2003), 국립문화재연구소
- 권오영, "유물과 벽화를 통해 본 고구려의 관 In 고고자료에서 찾은 고구려인의 삶과 문화" (2006), 고구려연구재단
- 朴景垠, "박산향로의승선도상연구", 美術史學硏究, 225 (2000)
- 이송란, "중국고대누금세공의연원과전개", 미술사연구, (15) (2001), 미술사연구회
- 이송란, "신라금속공예연구" (2004), 일지사
- 백제무령왕과왕비관의復元試論과도상, "이송란", 국립공주박물관, ~ (2006)
- 崔圭順, "中國歷代帝王冕冠硏究" (2007), 東華大學校出版部
- 崔圭順, "蔡邕『獨斷』중의복식자료", 전통의생활연구, 2 (2008), 단국대학교전통복식연구소
- 賈璽增, "中國古代首服硏究", 박사, pp.2006
- 金榮煥, "北魏與東北諸國關係硏究-以庫莫奚·契丹·高句麗·勿吉爲中心", 석사, 歷史學科, pp.1990
- 南京博物館, "江蘇南京仙鶴觀東晋墓", 文物, (3) (2001)
- 南京市博物館, "南京市郭家山東晉溫氏家族墓", 考古, (6) (2008)
- 內田吟風, "北アジア史硏究 鮮卑柔然突闕篇" (1975), 同朋舍
- 戴應新, "陝西神木出土匈奴文物", 文物, (12) (1983)
- 劉躍進, "蔡邕著述錄", 古籍整理硏究學刊, (4) (2002)
- 李國文, "蔡邕之死", 領導文萃, (7) (2001)
- 林西縣文物管理所, "林西縣蘇泗汰鮮卑墓葬 In 內蒙古文物考古文集 第二輯" (1997), 中國大百科全書出版社
- 萬欣, "鮮卑墓葬,三燕史迹與金步搖飾的發現與硏究 In 遼寧考古文集" (2003), 遼寧民族出版社
- 山西大學歷史文化學院, "大同南郊北魏墓群" (2006), 科學出版社
- 徐秉琨, "中國東北部の朝鮮文化の墓葬 In 新澤千塚の遺寶とその源流" (1992), 奈良縣立原考古學硏究所附設博物館
- 孫機, "步搖·步搖冠·搖飾片 In 中國聖火-中國古文物與東西文化交流中的若干問題" (1996), 遼寧敎育出版社
- 宿白, "東北, 蒙古地區的卑遺跡-鮮卑遺蹟輯錄之一", 文物, (5) (1997)
- 躍進, "蔡邕的生平作與漢末文風的轉變", 文學評論, (3) (2004)
- 陽堅, "內蒙古地區鮮卑墓葬的發現與硏究" (2004), 科學出版社
- 烏蘭察布博物館, "察右後旗三道灣墓地 In 內蒙古文物考古文集" (1994), 中國大百科書出版社
- 吳松岩, "早期卑墓葬究", 박사
- 王國維, "胡服考 In 觀堂集林" (1975), 河洛圖書出版社
- 王金鎬, "談談我國東北地區的絲綢之路 In 東北亞歷史與文化-慶祝孫進己先生六十誕辰文集" (1991), 遼沈書社
- 王宇, "遼西地區慕容卑及三燕期墓葬究", 석사, pp.2008
- 王志高, "南京大學北園東晋大墓時代及墓主身分討論-謙論東晋時代的合葬墓", 東南文化, (9) (2003)
- 王志高, "南京仙觀東晋墓出土文物的初步認識", (1) (2001)
- 劉博泉, "“鮮卑郭洛帶”及以鮮卑命名有關的問題", 遼海文物學刊, (1) (1989)
- 劉博泉, "“鮮卑郭洛帶”及以鮮卑命名有關的問題", 遼海文物學刊, (1) (1989), 遼寧省博物館建館
- 田廣金, "西溝畔匈奴墓反映的諸問題", 文物, (7) (1980)
- 田廣金, "內蒙古阿魯柴登發現的匈奴遺物", 考古, (4) (1980)
- 町田章, "胡服東漸 In 文化財論叢Ⅱ" (1995), 同朋舍出版
- 程曉英, "中國古代冠類首服的造型分類與文化內涵", 紡織學報, 29(10) (2008)
- 趙越, "內蒙古右旗拉布達林發卑墓", 考古, (10) (1990)
- 周錫保, "中國古代服飾史" (1984), 中國戱劇出版社
- 黃能馥, "中國服裝史" (1995), 中國旅遊出版社
- 高春明, "中國衣冠飾大辭典" (1996), 上海辭書出版社
- 曾布川寬, "崑崙山と昇仙圖", 東方學報, 51 (1979)
- 陳棠棟, "鮮卑動物形裝飾中反映的拓跋族源與祖源神話的創作", 遼海文物學刊, (2) (1993)
- 陳山, "喇洞墓地三燕文化居民人骨究", 박사, pp.2009
- 吳桂兵, "南京大學北園東晋大墓的形制墓主及其他-兩晉兩晋偏室墓硏究之", 東南文化, (9) (2003)
- 樋口隆康, "テイラ·テペの遺寶", 佛敎藝術, (137) (1981)
- 黃雪寅, "卑冠飾與中國古代冠帽文化", 內蒙古文物考古, (1)통권 : 26 (2002)
