장혁주의 「춘향전」을 통해 본 제국과 식민지의 변주
Cross Penetration of Empire and Colony in Chunhyangjeon by Jang Hyukju
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Cross Penetration of Empire and Colony in Chunhyangjeonby Jang HyukjuKim, Gae JaThis article considers Chunhyanjeon written in Japanese by Jang Hyukju in1938. His Chunhyangjeon was presented from among the collusion and crackof 'things Japanese' and 'things Chosun' discussed in Japanese literary world inthe 1930's. This article analyzed the writing method and the meaning of the text. Jang Hyukju(張赫宙, 1905∼1997) became known to Japanese literary worldby the second grade nomination of the prize contest of the magazine Kaizo in1932. Since then, he worked actively in the Japanese literary world by writingnovels in Japanese and introducing the literature of Chosun. Thanks to his activity,the literature of Chosun drew attraction from the Japanese, which can be called'boom'. Jang Hyukju was in the middle of this boom. So, his text presented thecollusion and crack of empire and colony. We can make sure this issue fromhis play Chunhyangjeon. When he presented Chunhyangjeon, Jang Hyukju mentioned his purpose ofwriting. He intended to write modern play in new literary style. Chunhyangjeonwas surely the material of things traditional Chosun, which was correspondedto the demand of Japanese literary world. Through the story of Chunhyangjeon,however, he formed the modern text style. He wrote in standard Japanese language,and described things from the perspective style which is often used in modernnovel. And he renewed the character characteristically and arranged the structureof the play. His writing style showed clear distinction in the comparison toChunhyangjeon written by You Chijin which was presented in Korean language2 years earlier than Jang Hyukuju's. The text Chunhyangjeon written in Japanese by Jang Hyukju reflected specificityas a district of Japan. But on the other hand, a new literary method of modernrealism was tried. Chunhyangjeon written by Jang Hyukju shows the crosspenetration of empire and colony. And in his Japanese-language literature, theliterature of Chosun is coexisting and playing variation.
Abstract
Cross Penetration of Empire and Colony in Chunhyangjeonby Jang HyukjuKim, Gae JaThis article considers Chunhyanjeon written in Japanese by Jang Hyukju in1938. His Chunhyangjeon was presented from among the collusion and crackof 'things Japanese' and 'things Chosun' discussed in Japanese literary world inthe 1930's. This article analyzed the writing method and the meaning of the text. Jang Hyukju(張赫宙, 1905∼1997) became known to Japanese literary worldby the second grade nomination of the prize contest of the magazine Kaizo in1932. Since then, he worked actively in the Japanese literary world by writingnovels in Japanese and introducing the literature of Chosun. Thanks to his activity,the literature of Chosun drew attraction from the Japanese, which can be called'boom'. Jang Hyukju was in the middle of this boom. So, his text presented thecollusion and crack of empire and colony. We can make sure this issue fromhis play Chunhyangjeon. When he presented Chunhyangjeon, Jang Hyukju mentioned his purpose ofwriting. He intended to write modern play in new literary style. Chunhyangjeonwas surely the material of things traditional Chosun, which was correspondedto the demand of Japanese literary world. Through the story of Chunhyangjeon,however, he formed the modern text style. He wrote in standard Japanese language,and described things from the perspective style which is often used in modernnovel. And he renewed the character characteristically and arranged the structureof the play. His writing style showed clear distinction in the comparison toChunhyangjeon written by You Chijin which was presented in Korean language2 years earlier than Jang Hyukuju's. The text Chunhyangjeon written in Japanese by Jang Hyukju reflected specificityas a district of Japan. But on the other hand, a new literary method of modernrealism was tried. Chunhyangjeon written by Jang Hyukju shows the crosspenetration of empire and colony. And in his Japanese-language literature, theliterature of Chosun is coexisting and playing variation.
참고문헌 (24)
- 張赫宙, "春香傳", 新潮 (1938)
- 張赫宙, "春香傳について", 文芸首都 (1938)
- 張赫宙, "春香傳の劇化", テアトロパンフレット, 7 (1938)
- 張赫宙, "朝鮮の知識人に訴ふ", 文藝 (1939)
- 강상순, "고전소설의 근대적 재인식과 정전화 과정: 1920~30년대를 중심으로", 민족문화연구, (55), pp.47~92 (2011), 민족문화연구원
- 고영란, "제국 일본의 출판시장 재편과 미디어 이벤트 ‘張赫宙’를 통해 본 1930년 전후의 개조사(改造社)의 전략", 사이間SAI, (6), pp.113~146 (2009), 국제한국문학문화학회
- 문경연, "1930년대 말 <신협(新協)>의 『춘향전』공연 관련 좌담회 연구", 우리어문연구, (36), pp.471~504 (2010), 우리어문학회
- 민병욱, "장혁주의 일어체 희곡 <춘향전> 연구", 한국문학논총, (48), pp.343~368 (2008), 한국문학회
- 박석태, "조선미술전람회를 통해 본 ‘향토성’ 개념 연구", 인천학연구 (2004)
- 백현미, "신민족적 전통과 동양적 전통- 1930년대 후반 경성과 동경에서의 <춘향전>공연을 중심으로", 현대문학이론연구, (23), pp.211~243 (2004), 현대문학이론학회
- 서동주, "1938년 일본어연극 <춘향전>의 조선 ‘귀환’과 제국일본의 조선 붐", 동아시아고대학, (30), pp.193~229 (2013), 동아시아고대학회
- 시라카와 유타카, "장혁주 연구-일어가 더 편했던 조선작가 그리고 그의 문학-" (2010), 동국대학교출판부
- 신승모, "도쿄 이주(1936년) 후의 장혁주 문학에 나타난 정체성의 모색-연속과 변용의 이행과정을 중심으로", 한국문학연구, (30), pp.321~358 (2006), 한국문학연구소
- 신아영, "유치진의 「춘향전」 연구", 京畿大學校論文集, 47 (2003)
- 유치진, "東朗 柳致眞 全集 1" (1988), 서울예대출판부
- 양근애, "1930년대 전통의 재발견과 연극 <춘향전>", 공연문화연구, (16), pp.143~176 (2008), 한국공연문화학회
- 猪俣津南雄, "日本的なものの社会的基礎", 中央公論 (1937)
- 亀井勝一郎, "日本的なものの将来", 新潮 (1937)
- 河上徹太郎, "日本的なものについて", 俳句研究 (1936)
- 九鬼周造, "日本的な性格について", 思想 (1937)
- "朝鮮古譚 春香傳批判座談会", テアトロ, ~ (1938)
- 長谷川如是閑, "日本的性格" (1938), 岩波書店
- 三木清, "日本的性格とファツシズム", 中央公論 (1936)
- 村山知義, "演出者の言葉", テアトロ·パンフレツト, 7 (1938), テアトロ社
