동의 및 공감의 응답 표현 ‘그러게’의 의미와 사용 조건
The Meaning and Usage Conditions of the Response Expression of Agreement and Empathy ‘kulekey’.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we investigated the meaning of theresponse expression ‘kulekey’ in Korean. The characteristics we identified for ‘kulekey’ can be summarized as follows: Firstly, the usages of ‘kulekey’ aredifferentiated based on the component of mirativity in their meaning. Secondly, ‘kulekey’ presupposes a certain level of reasoning process by the respondentregarding the content of empathy. Thirdly, expressions of empathy using ‘kulekey’ incorporate emotions of questioning, doubt, or incomprehensibility. Based on these observations, we compared ‘kulekey’ with expressions such as ‘kulssey’, ‘kulenikka’, ‘hakinun’, and the Japanese word ‘tashikani’. ‘kulssey’, asan expression of agreement and empathy, is very similar to ‘kulekey’, but itis characterized by being used only in non-mirative contexts. ‘kulenikka’, as anexpression of agreement and empathy, is used in non-mirative contexts,expresses a wide range of emotions including questioning, and has the featureof indicating a higher cognitive position of the respondent compared to ‘kulekey’. While ‘hakinun’ is not an expression of response, it shares similarities with oneof the usages of ‘kulekey’ related to deferred realization. The detailed differencelies in the fact that ‘hakinun’ contains the meaning of acknowledgment, whereas ‘kulekey’ contains the meaning of awareness. The Japanese word 'tashikani' hasvarious uses, and among them, the holophrase usage shares many commonalitieswith the mirative ‘kulekey’.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the meaning of theresponse expression ‘kulekey’ in Korean. The characteristics we identified for ‘kulekey’ can be summarized as follows: Firstly, the usages of ‘kulekey’ aredifferentiated based on the component of mirativity in their meaning. Secondly, ‘kulekey’ presupposes a certain level of reasoning process by the respondentregarding the content of empathy. Thirdly, expressions of empathy using ‘kulekey’ incorporate emotions of questioning, doubt, or incomprehensibility. Based on these observations, we compared ‘kulekey’ with expressions such as ‘kulssey’, ‘kulenikka’, ‘hakinun’, and the Japanese word ‘tashikani’. ‘kulssey’, asan expression of agreement and empathy, is very similar to ‘kulekey’, but itis characterized by being used only in non-mirative contexts. ‘kulenikka’, as anexpression of agreement and empathy, is used in non-mirative contexts,expresses a wide range of emotions including questioning, and has the featureof indicating a higher cognitive position of the respondent compared to ‘kulekey’. While ‘hakinun’ is not an expression of response, it shares similarities with oneof the usages of ‘kulekey’ related to deferred realization. The detailed differencelies in the fact that ‘hakinun’ contains the meaning of acknowledgment, whereas ‘kulekey’ contains the meaning of awareness. The Japanese word 'tashikani' hasvarious uses, and among them, the holophrase usage shares many commonalitieswith the mirative ‘kulekey’.
참고문헌 (21)
- "Korea University Korean Dictionary"
- "Standard Korean Language Dictionary"
- "Yonesi Korean Dictionary"
- Adachi, Taro, "fukushi ga bunmatsu keishiki ni ataeru eikyo(Effects of Adverbs on Sentence-Final Form)", Hiroshima Joshi Daigaku Kokusaibunkagakubu Kiyo, 3, pp.1~11 (1997)
- An, Yoon Mi, "A Study on the Discourse Marker ‘Kulehge’", Korean Linguistics, 56, pp.91~118 (2012)
- 최윤지, "양태접속부사 ‘하기는’의 의미", 한국어의미학, 73, pp.83~116 (2021)
- 조민정, "응답표현의 상호작용적 기능 고찰-‘잘됐네, 그렇지, 그러게, 글쎄’를 중심으로-", 한말연구, 44, pp.175~207 (2017)
- Kim, Sun-Ja, "tayhwauy maccangkwu swuhayng hyengsikkwa kinung (Forms and Functions of the Backchannel Expressions in Conversation)", Textlingustics, 6, pp.45~69 (1999)
- Koo, Hyun Jung, "On Grammaticalization of ‘-kinun’ Construction in Korean", Discourse and Cognition, 19(3), pp.1~28 (2012)
- Kudo, Hiroshi, "Meanings and Functions of Modal Adverbs in Modern Japanese:In search of a Method of Description", Occasional Papers (National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics), 71(3), pp.45~92 (1982)
- Lee, Haiyoung, "tamhwa phyoci ‘kulssey’uy tamhwakinungkwa sayonguymi (The Discourse Function and Meaning of the Discourse Marker ‘kulssey’)", Journal of Ewha Korean Language and Literature, 13, pp.129~150 (1994)
- 이상신, "‘글쎄’와 ‘그러게’의 기원과 방언형", 인문연구, 71, pp.105~132 (2014)
- Lee, Won-Pyo, "Discourse Analysis of three “Volitional interjections,” “yey”, “kulssey”, and “ani” in Korean", Inmwunkwahak, 69, pp.139~185 (1993)
- Lim, Gyu-Hong, "Meanings and Functions of Korean Discourse Marker ‘mariya’", Discourse and Cognition, 5(2), pp.159~179 (1998)
- Noh, Eun Hee, "A Study on the Hearer's Supportive Back-channel Types and Functions", Journal of Speech Communication, 4, pp.245~269 (2002)
- Oh, Seung Shin, "A study on the interjection in Korean", Ph D, pp.1995
- Rhee, Seongha, "On the Emergence of Korean Markers of Agreement", Journal of Pragmatics, 83, pp.10~26 (2015)
- 서희정, "한국어 교육 항목으로서 담화표지 ‘말이다’에 대한 고찰", 이중언어학, 43, pp.217~246 (2010)
- 송인성, "‘글쎄’의 담화 기능에 따른 운율 실현 양상", 한말연구, 52, pp.139~170 (2019)
- Takahashi, Miho, "Study of the Japanese Adjective “tashika-ni” -the Usage from Adjective to Adverb-", Journal of Japanese Language and Culture, 51, pp.125~144 (2020)
- 종예, "중국인 학습자를 위한 한국어 담화 표지교수·학습 연구: ‘그러게, 그러니까’를 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(21), pp.545~572 (2019)