본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국인의 대화에 나타난 비공감적 화용 양상 분석— 공감적 청자 반응 전략의 부적절한 사용양상을 중심으로 —

Analysis of Unsympathetic Pragmatic Patterns in Korean Conversations: Focusing on Inappropriate Use Aspects of Empathic Listener Response Strategies

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study was designed to analyse inappropriate use patterns of empathic listener response strategies by collecting ordinary conversation data of Korean people. Among empathic understanding responses, in the type of receptive listening, the ‘feeling expression’ strategy was realized in inappropriate ways, such as expression of negative feelings, disregard of the opponent and excessive expression of subjective feelings, and the ‘expatiation’ strategy was realized as listener’s arbitrary interpretation or patterns like assessing, judging, and concluding. The ‘information request’ strategy was realized as a series of questions that were not related to topics. When it comes to empathic emotional concentration responses, in the type of ‘active listening’, negative ‘paraphrasing’ patterns, such as speculation or criticism were found, in addition to the absence of ‘inferential empathy’ strategy. ‘Suggestion of cases’ was realized as self-display and ‘induction of objective perspectives’ was realized in inappropriate ways, such as unilateral advice or counsel. In the type of ‘encouragement’, the absence of the ‘consolation’ strategy was remarkable, and criticism, disregard and advice were found at the relevant point. Among empathic conversation cooperation responses, in the type of opponent utterance induction, the ‘direct response utterance request’ strategy was realized in inappropriate ways like compulsion of utterances and disregard of the opponent, and the ‘indirect response utterance request’ strategy was realized in inappropriate ways like wrong prediction. In the type of presentation of opinions, disregard of opponent opinions and unilateral opinions were found at the point of the ‘perspective difference’ strategy, and the ‘agreement’ strategy was also realized in inappropriate ways, such as limited and incomplete agreement.

Abstract

This study was designed to analyse inappropriate use patterns of empathic listener response strategies by collecting ordinary conversation data of Korean people. Among empathic understanding responses, in the type of receptive listening, the ‘feeling expression’ strategy was realized in inappropriate ways, such as expression of negative feelings, disregard of the opponent and excessive expression of subjective feelings, and the ‘expatiation’ strategy was realized as listener’s arbitrary interpretation or patterns like assessing, judging, and concluding. The ‘information request’ strategy was realized as a series of questions that were not related to topics. When it comes to empathic emotional concentration responses, in the type of ‘active listening’, negative ‘paraphrasing’ patterns, such as speculation or criticism were found, in addition to the absence of ‘inferential empathy’ strategy. ‘Suggestion of cases’ was realized as self-display and ‘induction of objective perspectives’ was realized in inappropriate ways, such as unilateral advice or counsel. In the type of ‘encouragement’, the absence of the ‘consolation’ strategy was remarkable, and criticism, disregard and advice were found at the relevant point. Among empathic conversation cooperation responses, in the type of opponent utterance induction, the ‘direct response utterance request’ strategy was realized in inappropriate ways like compulsion of utterances and disregard of the opponent, and the ‘indirect response utterance request’ strategy was realized in inappropriate ways like wrong prediction. In the type of presentation of opinions, disregard of opponent opinions and unilateral opinions were found at the point of the ‘perspective difference’ strategy, and the ‘agreement’ strategy was also realized in inappropriate ways, such as limited and incomplete agreement.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 구현정, "드라마 대화에 반영된 갈등 표현 양상", 화법연구, (22), pp.9~32 (2013), 한국화법학회[DOI]
  2. 권순희, "갈등 대화와 협력 대화 양상 비교 분석 - <안녕! 자두야>, <구름빵> 애니메이션을 중심으로 -", 텍스트언어학, 36, pp.79~120 (2014), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
  3. 김순자, "말차례 뺏기에 나타난 남녀 화자의 특징", 화법연구, 2, pp.61~92 (2000), 한국화법학회
  4. 김윤정, "모둠 토론에서 초등학생들의 끼어들기 양상", 화법연구, (30), pp.147~174 (2015), 한국화법학회[DOI]
  5. 김현정, "(A)contrastive analysis of compliments and compliment responses in Korea and English", 석사, 영어, pp.1996
  6. 김혜정, "갈등대화의 개념과 구조- 고부간 갈등대화를 중심으로 -", 우리말연구, (20), pp.229~260 (2007), 우리말학회
  7. 노은희, "세대 간 갈등 대화에서의 말대답·말대꾸 양상 분석", 화법연구, (29), pp.65~102 (2015), 한국화법학회[DOI]
  8. 朴聖賢, "한국어 말차례체계와 화제", 박사, 언어학, pp.1996
  9. 손달임, "갈등적 화의 원리와 구조 연구 : TV 드라마에 등장하는 남녀의 대화를 중심으로", 이화어문논집, 26, pp.67~94 (2008), 이화어문학회
  10. 유동엽, "일상 대화의 논쟁 원리와 전략에 대한 연구", 국어교육학연구, (16) (2003), 국어교육학회
  11. 이두원, "부부간 커뮤니케이션 행위에 대한 대화분석연구", 커뮤니케이션학연구, 10(2), pp.7~45 (2002), 한국커뮤니케이션학회
  12. 이소영, "불만상담대화의 분석 - 입장 차이를 중심으로", 독어독문학, 59(1), pp.269~294 (2018), 한국독어독문학회[DOI]
  13. 이혜원, "대화 촉진을 위한 공감적 청자 반응 전략 연구 -한국어 학습자를 중심으로-", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 42, pp.241~269 (2015), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
  14. 이혜원, "한국인의 대화에 나타난 공감적 청자 반응 전략 연구", 한글, (312), pp.5~35 (2016), 한글학회
  15. 이혜원, "한국인 학습자를 위한 공감적 청자 반응 전략 연구", 박사, pp.2016
  16. 임규홍, "국어 담화의 끼어들기 유형에 대한 연구", 언어과학연구, 20, pp.321~352 (2001), 언어과학회
  17. 조재윤, "부모-자녀의 화 방법 연구", 화법연구, 6, pp.9~34 (2003), 한국화법학회
  18. 정민주, "다문화 고부 갈등 대화에 나타난 불평 화행의 실현 양상과 교육적 시사점", 국어교육연구, (64), pp.21~48 (2017), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
  19. 정성미, "부부갈등대화 분석연구", 어문론집, 62, pp.159~187 (2015), 중앙어문학회[DOI]
  20. Gale, J. E, "Conversation Analysis of Therapeutic Discourse: The Pursuit of a Therapeutic Agenda" (1991), Greenwood Pub Group

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)