부사 ‘그렇게’의 극성 연구
Studies on the polarity aspect of Korean adverb kulehkey.
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of current study is to identify the semantic-o-pragmatic role of Korean adverb kulehkey ‘so/very/that much.’Korean Journal of Linguistics, Thus far, the role of kulehkey has been treated as a polysemy between strong NPI and degree adverb. Given the set of empirical data, however, our novel claim is that the function of kulehkey can be unified under the single role of NPI(strong/weak). Following the framework of the scalar principle and scalar model theory, we show that weak NPI kulehkey functions as an emphatic scalar intensifier whereas strong NPI kulehkey as an attenuating NPI. As an intensifier, kulehkey emphasizes the speaker’s attitude that can be characterized as involving a high scalarity of the speaker’s commitment to the proposition. Our claim will be further supported by corpus study. Theoretical implication of current study is to provide the widened view of crosslinguistic variation to cases where language parameterize the semantics and pragmatics of their non-degreeable and rhetoric scalar reasoning.
Abstract
The purpose of current study is to identify the semantic-o-pragmatic role of Korean adverb kulehkey ‘so/very/that much.’Korean Journal of Linguistics, Thus far, the role of kulehkey has been treated as a polysemy between strong NPI and degree adverb. Given the set of empirical data, however, our novel claim is that the function of kulehkey can be unified under the single role of NPI(strong/weak). Following the framework of the scalar principle and scalar model theory, we show that weak NPI kulehkey functions as an emphatic scalar intensifier whereas strong NPI kulehkey as an attenuating NPI. As an intensifier, kulehkey emphasizes the speaker’s attitude that can be characterized as involving a high scalarity of the speaker’s commitment to the proposition. Our claim will be further supported by corpus study. Theoretical implication of current study is to provide the widened view of crosslinguistic variation to cases where language parameterize the semantics and pragmatics of their non-degreeable and rhetoric scalar reasoning.
참고문헌 (36)
- 김윤신, "부정극어와 척도 개념", 제 8회 한글 및 한국어 정보처리 학술대회 논문집, pp.177~188 (1996)
- 김인규, "'이, 그, 저'의 지시적 용법과 비지시적 용법 : 경북 지역 구술 발화 자료를 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2012
- 고혜원, "정도부사 ‘너무’의 의미와 공기 특성", 어문론집, 46, pp.121~139 (2011), 중앙어문학회
- 남승호, "한국어 부정극어의 유형과 그 허가조건", 언어학, (22), pp.217~244 (1998), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 朴仙子, "한국어 어찌말 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1983
- 박주형, "‘그렇게’의 정도부사적 용법 연구", 2017년 국어학회 여름학술대회 발표 자료집, pp.125~142 (2017)
- 서경희, "이게 바로 그거야: 원근지시에서 태도지시로", 담화와인지, 6(2), pp.1~22 (1999)
- 신지연, "구어에서 지시어의 용법에 대하여", 어학연구, 29(3), pp.363~381 (1993)
- 신지연, "국어 지시용언 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 이기갑, "‘그러하-’의 지시와 대용, 그리고 그 역사", 언어, 19(2), pp.455~488 (1994)
- 이정민, "부정과 부정극어", pp.185~224 (2005), 한국문화사
- 이환묵, "국어의 극어와 화용상의 가정", 어학연구, 13(2), pp.115~127 (1977)
- 장경희, "지시어 ‘이, 그, 저’의 의미분석", 국어연구, 16(2), pp.167~184 (1980)
- 전병쾌, "한국어 부정구조의 분석" (1983), 한신문화사
- 홍사만, "국어 정도 부사의 피한정어 연구", 어문학, 76, pp.153~175 (2002), 한국어문학회
- Giannakidou, Anastasia, "Perspectives on negation and polarity items", pp.99~128 (2001)
- Giannakidou, Anastasia., "Semantics", pp.1660~1712 (2011)
- Kay, Paul, "Even", Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, pp.59~111 (1990)
- Ekaterina Malik, "부사 '그렇게'의 의미 연구 : 지시성, 부정극성, 증거성을 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2012
- Fauconnier, G, "Pragmatic scale and Logical Structures", Linguistic Inquiry, 6, pp.353~375 (1975)
- Fillmore, Charles J., "Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone", Language, 64, pp.501~538 (1988)
- von Fintel, Kai, "NPI licensing, Strawson Entailment, and context dependency", Journal of Semantics, 16, pp.97~148 (1999)
- Israel, Michael, "Minimizers, maximizers and the rhetoric of scalar reasoning", Journal of Semantics, 18(4), pp.297~331 (2001)
- Ladusaw, William, "On the notion “affective” in the analysis of negative polarity items", Jounal of Linguistic Research, 1, pp.1~23 (1980)
- Lee, Jungmee, "Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8", pp.287~311 (2011)
- Levshina, Natalia, "How to do Linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis" (2015), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Lim, Dongsik., "Evidentials and Interrogatives: A Case Study from Korean", PhD, pp.2010
- Matsui, Ai., "On the understating NPIs: Manipulating the domain of degrees? Japanese a(n)mari and sonnani", Proceedings of SALT, 21 (2011)
- "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" (2019)[URL]
- 박명관, "Extraction out of overt anaphora: Korean kule(h) 'so' versus English so", 언어연구, 32(3), pp.693~718 (2015), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Portner, Paul., "Modality" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Stalnaker, Roberts., "Syntax and Semantics: 9" (1978), Academic Press
- Stalnaker, Roberts, "Common ground", Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, pp.701~721 (2002)
- Umbach, Carla, "German demonstrative ‘so’ – intensifying and hedging effects", Sprache und Datenverabeitung (International Journal for Language Data Processing), pp.153~168 (2009)
- Zwarts, Frans., "Plurality and Quantification", pp.177~238 (1998)
- "21세기 세종계획 세종형태의미분석 말뭉치"[URL]