본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Multiplier Decomposition in the Textile Industry among Korea, China and Japan : Focused on the World Input-Output Table

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

In this study, using the 2011 World Input-Output Table published by WIOD in 2015, multiplier effects in the textile industry among Korea, China and Japan are decomposed. The World Input-Output Table includes input-output tables from a total of 40 countries consisting of 27 EU countries and 13 other countries from the rest of world. In this study, the data was re-categorized into four countries of Korea, China, Japan and other countries, and the industries are reclassified to 34 sectors for the reanalysis. When final demands of the textile industry in Korea increase by 10,000 units, the influences on both China and Japan were intensively analyzed. The summary of the analyzed results in this study and suggestions for policies are as follows:First, as a result of decomposing the multiplier effects among Korea, China and Japan, for intra-country(domestic) multiplier effect, China accounted for the highest(about 3.1 times), then Japan(about 2.12 times) and Korea(about 2.10 times) followed in order. Korea should make an effort to double domestic multiplier effect by studying the domestic intermediate transactions and adding value chains. Second, for spillover effects by each other among Korea, China and Japan, Korea accounted for the highest value on China with 3,116.46 units, and Japan also accounted for the highest one on China with 2,949.58 units. However, China accounted for relatively lower effects on Korea and Japan. China has a broad domestic market and its domestic multiplier effect is high, but Korea has a low domestic one. Korea requires a strategy to raise the domestic multiplier effect by expanding the domestic market and strengthening input-output structure within its textile industry. Third, for feedback effect, China was the highest with 59.77 units while Korea and Japan accounted for lower values 37.11 units and 36.40 units, respectively. Finally, to develop the Korean textile industry, the input-output structure between China and Japan should be precisely analyzed and then the solutions for raising competitive power should be sought.

Abstract

In this study, using the 2011 World Input-Output Table published by WIOD in 2015, multiplier effects in the textile industry among Korea, China and Japan are decomposed. The World Input-Output Table includes input-output tables from a total of 40 countries consisting of 27 EU countries and 13 other countries from the rest of world. In this study, the data was re-categorized into four countries of Korea, China, Japan and other countries, and the industries are reclassified to 34 sectors for the reanalysis. When final demands of the textile industry in Korea increase by 10,000 units, the influences on both China and Japan were intensively analyzed. The summary of the analyzed results in this study and suggestions for policies are as follows:First, as a result of decomposing the multiplier effects among Korea, China and Japan, for intra-country(domestic) multiplier effect, China accounted for the highest(about 3.1 times), then Japan(about 2.12 times) and Korea(about 2.10 times) followed in order. Korea should make an effort to double domestic multiplier effect by studying the domestic intermediate transactions and adding value chains. Second, for spillover effects by each other among Korea, China and Japan, Korea accounted for the highest value on China with 3,116.46 units, and Japan also accounted for the highest one on China with 2,949.58 units. However, China accounted for relatively lower effects on Korea and Japan. China has a broad domestic market and its domestic multiplier effect is high, but Korea has a low domestic one. Korea requires a strategy to raise the domestic multiplier effect by expanding the domestic market and strengthening input-output structure within its textile industry. Third, for feedback effect, China was the highest with 59.77 units while Korea and Japan accounted for lower values 37.11 units and 36.40 units, respectively. Finally, to develop the Korean textile industry, the input-output structure between China and Japan should be precisely analyzed and then the solutions for raising competitive power should be sought.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Balamou, Eudokia, "Nature of Rural-Urban Interdependencies and their Diffsion Patterns in Southern Greece: an Interregional SAM Model", the Applied Regional Science Conference (ARSC), 18(1) (2006), Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
  2. Dietzenbacher, Erik, "International Multipliers: Looking Backward, looking Forward", Regional Studies, (36), pp.125~136 (2002)
  3. Gillen, W. J., "Interregional Feedbacks in Input-Output Models", Journal of Regional Science, 20, pp.477~482 (1980)
  4. 권태현, "세계산업연관표를 이용한 한국과 주요국의 부문별 산출변동 요인 분해", 박사, 경제학과, pp.2014
  5. 김의준, "투입산출 구조분해를 이용한 지역별 산업구조와 생산성의 연계성 분석", 지역연구, 27(4), pp.65~86 (2011), 한국지역학회
  6. Lee, Choon-Keun, "Regional Input-Output Analysis" (2006), Hakmoonsa
  7. 이춘근, "국제산업연관표에 의한 한·중·일 간 섬유산업의 연관구조 분석", 지역산업연구, 38(4), pp.175~197 (2015), 산업경영연구소
  8. 이춘근, "‘Multiplier Decomposition in Major Industries between Korea and Japan on the International Input-output Table", 지역산업연구, 39(2), pp.157~181 (2016), 산업경영연구소
  9. 이홍배, "동북아 역내 국가간 생산 및 무역 유발구조 변화와 요인 분해", 비교경제연구, 17(1), pp.1~32 (2010), 한국비교경제학회
  10. Miller, R. E, "Interregional Feedback Effects in Input-Output Models: Some Preliminary Results", Papers of Regional Science Association, 17(1), pp.105~125 (1966)
  11. Miller, R. E, "Upper Bounds on the Sizes of International Feedbacks Multiregional input-output Models", Journal of Regional Science, 26, pp.285~306 (1986)
  12. Miller, R. E., "Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions" (2009), Prentice-Hall, Inc
  13. Pyatt, Grahamy, "Accounting and Fixed Prices Multipliers in a Social Accounting Matrix Framework", Economic Journal, 89(356) (1979)
  14. Round, Jeffery I., "Decomposing Multipliers for Economic Systems Involving Regional and World Trade", Economic Journal, 95(378), pp.383~399 (1985)
  15. Round, Jeffery I., "Input-Output Analysis : Frontiers and Extensions", pp.54~70 (2001), Palgrave Publishers Ltd.
  16. Stone, R., "The Disaggregation of the Households Sector in the National Accounts", Social Accounting Matries: A Basis for Planning, a World Bank Symposium, pp.145~185 (1985), World Bank
  17. The Bank of Korea, "The Structure of the Korean Economy; Analyzing the International Input-Output Table", Quarterly National Accounts Review (2014)
  18. Timmer, M. P., "An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production", Review of International Economics (2015)
  19. WIOD, "2011 World Input-Output Table", ~ (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)