Ruling Without Rulers: A Daoist Political Framework for AI Governance
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly mediate decisions across social, political, and economic spheres, prevailing governance models-rooted in liberal legalism, technocratic control, and risk-management frameworks-struggle to adapt to the complexities of distributed, opaque, and evolving machine systems. This paper proposes a Daoist political framework for AI governance, drawing upon foundational concepts from classical Daoism such as wuwei (non-coercive action), ziran (emergent natural order), and de (ethical potency). These principles offer a philosophical and practical alternative to dominant paradigms of control, emphasizing contextual responsiveness, moral resonance, and the strategic value of restraint. The paper critically reviews existing Western approaches to AI governance, including liberal rights-based regulation, technocratic optimization, and critical theory’s focus on platform power. While each contributes valuable insights, they often lack the ontological flexibility and ethical adaptability required for governing intelligent systems. In contrast, Daoist political thought reframes governance as resonance rather than rule, highlighting the importance of self-organization, ambiguity tolerance, and ethical alignment over enforcement. Addressing common critiques-such as the cultural specificity of Daoism or its supposed institutional vagueness-the study argues for the utility of Daoist concepts in designing hybrid, post-Western governance architectures. These models would not reject regulation but reinterpret it as a participatory and evolving process, aligned with the rhythms of dynamic systems rather than imposed upon them. Ultimately, the Daoist approach calls for a shift from commanding systems to cultivating conditions for co-evolution between humans and machines. In an era of entangled agency and algorithmic opacity, Daoist political theory offers a timely, pluralistic, and morally grounded path forward-one that seeks not to dominate complexity, but to dwell within it wisely.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly mediate decisions across social, political, and economic spheres, prevailing governance models-rooted in liberal legalism, technocratic control, and risk-management frameworks-struggle to adapt to the complexities of distributed, opaque, and evolving machine systems. This paper proposes a Daoist political framework for AI governance, drawing upon foundational concepts from classical Daoism such as wuwei (non-coercive action), ziran (emergent natural order), and de (ethical potency). These principles offer a philosophical and practical alternative to dominant paradigms of control, emphasizing contextual responsiveness, moral resonance, and the strategic value of restraint. The paper critically reviews existing Western approaches to AI governance, including liberal rights-based regulation, technocratic optimization, and critical theory’s focus on platform power. While each contributes valuable insights, they often lack the ontological flexibility and ethical adaptability required for governing intelligent systems. In contrast, Daoist political thought reframes governance as resonance rather than rule, highlighting the importance of self-organization, ambiguity tolerance, and ethical alignment over enforcement. Addressing common critiques-such as the cultural specificity of Daoism or its supposed institutional vagueness-the study argues for the utility of Daoist concepts in designing hybrid, post-Western governance architectures. These models would not reject regulation but reinterpret it as a participatory and evolving process, aligned with the rhythms of dynamic systems rather than imposed upon them. Ultimately, the Daoist approach calls for a shift from commanding systems to cultivating conditions for co-evolution between humans and machines. In an era of entangled agency and algorithmic opacity, Daoist political theory offers a timely, pluralistic, and morally grounded path forward-one that seeks not to dominate complexity, but to dwell within it wisely.