인공지능(AI)과 정치의 관계 맺기: AI는 통치수단일 수 있는가?
Can we use AI as a Governance Tool: Relationship between AI and Politics
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본고는 ‘인공지능(AI)은 정치참여가 가능한지 또는 통치의 수단으로 활용할 수 있는가’ 라는 물음에 대한 가능성의 논거를 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 인공지능을 정치에 활용할 수 있다는 견해는 첫째, AI를 통치의 수단으로 활용할 수 있다는 견해, 둘째, AI에게 ‘도덕적 조언자’ 역할을 부여할 수 있다는 입장이다. 인공지능(AI)은 스스로 자기의 성장, 활동에 필요한 알고리즘을 생성하지 못한다.인간이 AI 작동 원리를 이식한다. 즉, 자율성을 가지지 못한 존재이다. 그러나 AI의기능에 주목하면, 인간과 유사한 수준의 역할을 수행한다. 이러한 기능은 앞으로더 확장될 것이다. 그렇다면, 태생적 존재성에 기반한 구별과 배제보다는 AI의 기능에 착목하는 새로운 발상이 필요하다는 점을 결론으로 제시한다.
Abstract
The function has been improved by the development of artificial intelligence(AI) technology. AI is playing a bigger role in politics. In fact, AI plays an important role in the decision-making process. Furthermore, AI candidates’ candidacy in local elections is drawing renewed attention in terms of enhancing efficiency in local administration and budget execution. The purpose of this article is to discuss whether AI can be used as a means of governance. There are two different views that allow AI to participate in politics. The first is the view that recognizes AI as a means of governance. The second is to give AI the role of moral advisor. But they are opposed to recognizing the legal rights of future independent AI. Others object to the future recognition of legal rights of AI. The debate over the role of AI is polarized in two directions. AI can’t make the algorithms they need for their growth and activities. AI is a non-independent entity. But AI has the same role as humans. The role of AI may expand. It is necessary to pay attention to the role rather than the independence in the future.
참고문헌 (61)
- 고선규, "인공지능과 어떻게 공존할 것인가 : 인간 + AI를 위한 새로운 플랫폼을 생각한다" (2019), 타커스
- 고선규, "인공지능(AI)시대의 지방정치와 정책결정과정의 변화", 지역과 정치, 3(2), pp.5~38 (2020)
- 신상규, "포스트 휴먼이 몰려온다 : AI시대, 다시 인간의 길을 여는 키워드 8" (2020), 아카넷
- 주목받는 인공지능(AI): 9대 핵심 기술 분석 및 주요 시사점, "한국정보화진흥원", ~ (2021)
- Alberts, Bruce, "Molecular Biology of the Cell" (2014), W. W. Norton & Company
- Bryson, Joanna J, "Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design issues", pp.63~74 (2010), ohn Benjamins
- Dennett, Denial C, "Kinds of Minds : Toward an Understanding of Consciousness" (1996), Basic Books
- Dignum, Virginia, "Responsible Autonomy", Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI and autonomy track), edited by Carles Sierra and IIIA-CSIC, pp.4698~4704 (2017)
- Epley, Nicholas, "On Seeing Human : A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism", Psychological Review, 114(4), pp.864~886 (2007)
- European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, "Artificial Intelligence" (2018), Robotics and ‘Autonomous’ Systems
- Draft Report with Recommendation to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics, "European Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs", ~ (2016)
- Firth, Roderick, "Ethical Absolutism and the Ideal Observer", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 12(3), pp.317~345 (1952)
- Floridi, Luciano, "On the Morality of Artificial Agents", Minds and Machines, 14(3), pp.349~379 (2004)
- Giubilini, Alberto, "The Artificial Moral Advisor : The"Ideal Observer"Meets Artificial Intelligence", Philosophy & technology, 31(2), pp.169~188 (2018)
- Gunkel, David J, "The Machine Question : Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics" (2012), MIT Press
- Gunkel, David J, "Robot Rights" (2018), MIT Press
- Hills, Alison, "Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology", Ethics, 120(1), pp.94~127 (2009)
- House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, "Robotics and Artificial Intelligence" (2016)
- IEEE, "Ethically Aligned Design First Edition" (2019)
- Jensen, Casper Brunn, "Techno-animism in Japan: Shinto Cosmograms, Actor-network Theory, and the Enabling Powers of Non-human Agencies", Theory, Culture & Society, 30(2), pp.84~115 (2013)
- Kawall, Jakson, "The International Encyclopedia of Ethics", pp.2523~2530 (2013), Wiley-Blackwell
- Latour, Bruno, "We Have Never Been Modern" (1993), Harvard University Press
- Libet, Benjamin, "Subjective Referral of the Timing for a Conscious Sensory Experience - A Functional Role for the Somatosensory Specific Projection System in Man", Brain, 102(1), pp.193~224 (1979)
- MacIntyre, Alasdair, "Dependent Rational Animals : Why Human Beings Need the Virtues" (1999), Open Court
- Maturana, Humberto R, "Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living" (1980), Springer Netherlands
- Maturana, Humberto R, "The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding" (1992), Shambhala
- Maturana, Humberto R., "The Origin of Humanness in the Biology of Love" (2009), Imprint Academic
- O’Neil, Cathy, "Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy" (2016), New York Crown Publishers
- Osaba, Osonde A., "An Intelligence in Our Image : The Risks of Bias and Errors in Artificial Intelligence" (2017), RAND Corporation
- Pagallo, Ugo, "The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contacts, and Torts" (2013), Springer
- Regan, Tom, "Animal Rights and Human Obligations" (1976), Prentice Hall
- RoboLaw, "Guidelines on Regulating Robotics", ~ (2014)
- Singer, Peter, "Animal Liberation : The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement" (2009), Harper Perennial
- Sullins, John P, "When Is a Robot a Moral Agent?", International Review of Information Ethics, 6, pp.23~30 (2006)
- Turner, Jacob, "Robot Rules: Regulating Artificial Intelligence" (2018), Palgrave Macmillan
- Varela, Francisco J, "Principles of Biological Autonomy" (1979), North Holland
- Varela, Francisco J, "Autopoiesis: A Theory of the Living Organization", pp.36~48 (1981), North Holland
- Varela, Francisco J, "Autopoiesis and a Biology of Intentionality", Autopoiesis and Perception: A Workshop with ESPRIT BRA 3352, pp.4~14 (1992), Dublin City University
- Varela, Francisco J., "The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience" (1991), MIT Press
- Wallach, Wendell, "Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong" (2009), Oxford University Press
- White, Trevor N., "Robot Ethics 2.0.: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence", pp.126~146 (2017), Oxford University Press
- Wiener, Norbert, "Cybernetics : Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine" (1948), John Wiley
- Wiener, Norbert, "God and Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion" (1964), The MIT Press
- NHK, "人工知能の最適解と人間の選択" (2017), NHK出版新書
- 稲葉振一郎(이나바 신이치로), "AI時代の労働哲学" (2020), 講談社
- 稲葉振一郎(이나바 신이치로), "人工知能と人間·社会" (2020), 勁草 書房
- 栗原聡(쿠리하라 사토시), "AI兵器と未来社会" (2019), 朝日新書
- 栗原聡(쿠리하라 사토시), "汎用AI実現のためのカキとなる自律性", 人工知能学会発表論文 (2017)
- 福田雅樹(후쿠다 마사키), "AIがつなげる社会 : AIネットワー ク時代の法・政治" (2017), 弘文堂
- 福井康人(후쿠이 야스히토), "自律型 殺傷武器システム(LAWS)をめ ぐる現状と課題", 政策討論会報告論文 (2019)
- 西垣通(니시가키 도루), "AI倫理" (2019), 中央新書
- 西田洋平(니시다 요헤이), "AI時代 の自律性", pp.45~68 (2019), 勁草書房
- 松尾豊(마츠오 유타카), "人工知能は人間を超えるか" (2017), 角川新書
- 松田道人(마츠다 미치히토), "日本のAI政党と新しい民主主義", 大邱大學校講義資料 (2020)
- 長井隆行(나가이 타카유키), "Multimodal Categorization", 人工知能学会誌, 27(6), pp.555~562 (2012)
- 田中潤(타나카 준), "誤解だらけの人 工知能" (2018), 光文社新書
- 佐藤丙午(사토 헤이고), "自律型 殺傷武器システム(LAWS)", 國際 問題, (672) (2018)
- 中島秀之(나카지마 히데유키), "人工知能 その到達点と未来" (2018), 小学舘
- 太田勝造(오타 쇼조), "AI時代の法学入門" (2020), 弘文堂
- 河島茂生(카와시마 시게오), "AI時代の自律性" (2019), 勁草書房
- 河島茂生(카와시마 시게오), "未來技術の倫理" (2020), 勁草書房