본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국의 소년사법제도와 지역사회의 참여

A Study on Juvenile Justice System and Community participation in the U.S.

김혜경|도중진
한국소년정책학회|2021.06|소년보호연구 (Korean Juvenile Protection Review)|제34권 제1호|pp. 53-85|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.35930/KJPR.34.1.3

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Early interventionJuvenile Delinquency소년범죄Juvenile Crime소년법Juvenile Justice System지역사회연계소년구금소년사법절차Juvenile Law Amendment미국 소년사법혼합형선고Rehibilitation

초록

In recent years, the US juvenile judicial policy has deviated from a hardened strategy, demanding judicial disposition in consideration of the developmental and scientific characteristics of juveniles, and efforts to seek the most effective measures to prevent recidivism from the strict distinction between punishment and security disposition. It has a lot of implications for our society as well. The increase in the qualitative importance and quantity of juvenile offenses, which have become a social issue in recent years, is rather promoting a social atmosphere that demands reinforcement of punishment for juvenile offenders. Nevertheless, why should the policy direction for juvenile offenses be prevention and discipline? Showing. In particular, in the United States, it is a policy direction that must be embraced to actively utilize community-connected programs to enable rehabilitation and daily protection even for boys in the dark where the judicial touch cannot reach. And it is attempted to block the tendency toward crime in advance through early intervention, so it is understood that normalization of school education and securing social stress through education are the most important juvenile policies. Based on the results of comparative studies showing that those who have left school education tend to be exposed to crime or become criminals, there is a tendency to see that completion of school education or return to school is the key to solving crimes for younger boys. In this paper is focused on the the recent trend of juvenile justice in the United States and the importance of revitalizing community-connected programs to be of significance in introducing them. In our society, the community program itself is limited, and protection measures are provided only to victims of juvenile crime. But juvenile offenders do not have the right to utilize or receive them. However, in the case of juveniles, the criminals are often victims of other social problems such as poverty, domestic violence, and sexual crimes, so it is necessary to try a protective approach both interdisciplinary and policy.

Abstract

In recent years, the US juvenile judicial policy has deviated from a hardened strategy, demanding judicial disposition in consideration of the developmental and scientific characteristics of juveniles, and efforts to seek the most effective measures to prevent recidivism from the strict distinction between punishment and security disposition. It has a lot of implications for our society as well. The increase in the qualitative importance and quantity of juvenile offenses, which have become a social issue in recent years, is rather promoting a social atmosphere that demands reinforcement of punishment for juvenile offenders. Nevertheless, why should the policy direction for juvenile offenses be prevention and discipline? Showing. In particular, in the United States, it is a policy direction that must be embraced to actively utilize community-connected programs to enable rehabilitation and daily protection even for boys in the dark where the judicial touch cannot reach. And it is attempted to block the tendency toward crime in advance through early intervention, so it is understood that normalization of school education and securing social stress through education are the most important juvenile policies. Based on the results of comparative studies showing that those who have left school education tend to be exposed to crime or become criminals, there is a tendency to see that completion of school education or return to school is the key to solving crimes for younger boys. In this paper is focused on the the recent trend of juvenile justice in the United States and the importance of revitalizing community-connected programs to be of significance in introducing them. In our society, the community program itself is limited, and protection measures are provided only to victims of juvenile crime. But juvenile offenders do not have the right to utilize or receive them. However, in the case of juveniles, the criminals are often victims of other social problems such as poverty, domestic violence, and sexual crimes, so it is necessary to try a protective approach both interdisciplinary and policy.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Anabel Cassady, "The Juvenile Ultimatum: Reframing Blended Sentencing Laws to Ensure Juveniles Receive a Genuine “One Last Chance at Success”", MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW (2017)
  2. "Arkansas State Legislature 92nd General Assembly - Regular Session, SB152 - AN ACT RESTORING ARKANSAS FAMILIES", ~ (2019)
  3. "Colorado General Assembly, SB19-108 Juvenile Justice Reform", ~ (2019)
  4. Curtis, C., "An evaluation of the Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies curriculum at key stage 1", Educational Psychology in Practice, 23(1) (2007)
  5. "Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders (DSO) Facts and Resources", ~ (2011)
  6. Development Services Group, Inc., "Literature review" (2015), Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
  7. Development Services Group, Inc., "Juvenile Reentry" (2017), U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
  8. "GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2019, SENATE BILL DRS35175-MV-114 Short Title: Raise the Age Modifications", ~ (2019)
  9. Nancy Harmon, "Early Intervention and Preventing Juvenile Delinquency", Arkansas Highway Police School of Law Enforcement Supervision, Session XLV, November 11, 2015., ~ (2015)
  10. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Delinquency Prevention & Intervention", The Torum for America’s Ideas, Nov. 10th, 2011, ~ (2011)
  11. National Conference of State Legislation, "Juvenile Justice 2019 Year-End Report", ~
  12. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquncy Prevention, "Juvenile court blended sentencing offense and minimum age criteria, 2015", ~ (2015)
  13. OJJDP, "Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement: 1997-2017", ~ (2017)
  14. Puzzanchera, C., "Juvenile Court Statistics 2018", ~ (2018)
  15. Rolf Loeber, "Child delinquency: Early Intervention and Prevention", U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, May, 2003, ~ (2003)
  16. Sarah Alice Brown, "Trends in Juvenile Justice State Legislation 2011-2015", National Conference of State Legislatures, Sept. 2015., ~ (2015)
  17. Sickmund, M., "Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement", ~ (2019)
  18. "STATE OF MICHIGAN 100TH LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION OF 2019", ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 102., ~
  19. Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services, "Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (JJDP) Alternative Interventions for Status Offenders Grant Guidelines, 2019", 8, 2019
  20. "101ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY, State of Illinois 2019 and 2020 SB1357"[URL]
  21. "2019 Montana Legislature SENATE BILL NO. 262"[URL]
  22. "80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 2019 Regular Session, Enrolled Senate Bill 1008"[URL]
  23. "9-Year-Old Charged With Murder in 5 Illinois Fire Deaths" (2019)[URL]
  25. "Calcasieu Parish Police Jury, LA, Fins Division"[URL]
  26. "The Judicial Branch of California, Guide to Dependency Court For Parent"[URL]
  27. "Colorado Legislature 2019 HB19-1335"[URL]
  28. "CORE Professional Services, P.A"[URL]
  29. "FINAL BILL REPORT E2SSB 5290"[URL]
  30. "Findlaw, Juvenile Court Procedure"[URL]
  31. "Police Questioning of Minors"[URL]
  32. "Legal Information Institute LII, parens patriae"[URL]
  33. "Legiscan 2019 HB0044"[URL]
  34. "Legiscan 2019 HB0168"[URL]
  35. "Legiscan 2019 HB1001"[URL]
  36. "Legiscan 2019 HB1755"[URL]
  37. "Legiscan 2019 HB763"[URL]
  38. "Legiscan 2019 SB0062"[URL]
  39. "Legiscan 2019 SB2449"[URL]
  40. "Legiscan 2019년 A314"[URL]
  41. "Legiscan Bringing people to the process, Louisiana House Bill 158(Prior Session Legislation)"[URL]
  42. "COMMITTED TO PROVIDING SERVICES TO FAMILIES IN NEED"[URL]
  43. "Maine Legislature 2019 HP1135"[URL]
  44. "Nebraska legislature"[URL]
  46. "Youth Confinement: The Whole Pie 2019"[URL]
  47. "Program Profile: Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP)"[URL]
  48. "Extended Jurisdiction Juvenile (EJJ) Designation"[URL]
  49. "Juvenile Court Process"[URL]
  50. "Juvenile Diversion Program"[URL]
  51. "Texas Capitol 2019 HB01760S"[URL]
  52. "The President on “My Brother's Keeper” Initiative" (2014)[URL]
  53. "Juvenile Blended Sentencing Law and Legal Definition"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

소년범의 재범방지를 위한 미국의 사례 및 그 시사점염윤호한국소년정책학회 · 소년보호연구2020 · 제33권 제2호한국 소년사법제도의 발전방안이영근한국소년정책학회 · 소년보호연구2015 · 제28권 제4호한국 소년보호처분제도의 문제점과 그 개선방안심재무한국비교형사법학회 · 비교형사법연구2008 · 제10권 제2호소년사범에 대한 지역사회교정의 현황과 개선방안강동욱, 김봉수한국법정책학회 · 법과정책연구2012 · 제12권 제2호소년조사제도의 현황과 재범 예방에 관한 고찰류혜연, 이수정, 정용찬한국소년정책학회 · 소년보호연구2020 · 제33권 제2호신 소년법상 보호처분의 문제점과 개선방안박영규한국소년정책학회 · 소년보호연구2011 · 제16권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

아동학대 행위분류와 새로운 대응방안의 필요성에 관한 연구 - 아동복지법 개정을 중심으로 -권솔지pp. 1-25소년사건에서의 이른바 역송(逆送)에 따른 절차의 존재방식 - 일본 「소년법」 제20조 제2항의 해석론을 참고로 하여 -김성규pp. 27-52소년원생의 정체성 변화(identity change)가 출원 후 범죄중단 과정에 미치는 영향박성훈pp. 87-110학교생활기록부 가해 조치삭제 제도에 대한 학교폭력 피해자의 인식에 관한 현상학적 연구성현준, 서민수, 박기영pp. 111-147비행청소년의 가정요인이 재범에 미치는 영향 연구 - 소년원 임시퇴원생을 중심으로 -성우제pp. 149-193
원문 보기