소년사건에서의 이른바 역송(逆送)에 따른 절차의 존재방식 - 일본 「소년법」 제20조 제2항의 해석론을 참고로 하여 -
Considerations regarding Transfer of Juveniles into the Adult Criminal Justice System — in Reference to Concept and Controversial Issues of Article 20, Paragraph 2 of Japan’s Juvenile Act —
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Japan, the Family Court holds jurisdiction over all delinquent juveniles, which differs from juvenile justice system of Korea. However, there are many similarities to the Korean system, in regards to the principle of delinquency control and the characteristics of juvenile protection proceedings. In Japan, the ferocity of juvenile crimes has been seriously recognized, and there has been a discussion about the age of juveniles subject to the juvenile law. For Korea, which shares the problems of juvenile crime, it is useful to take a look at the reality of Japan's juvenile justice system and the challenges it faces, in order to suggest the direction of future policy. In Korea, discussions about juvenile justice policy that expands the application of criminal punishment as a reaction to a series of heinous juvenile crimes or violent juvenile crimes has been supported by the public and the media. Examining the discussion in Japan regarding the method and procedure of the decision to referral (remitment) to a prosecutor (Article 20 of Japan’s Juvenile Act), and the methods of holding criminal trials of juveniles after a remitment-to-prosecutor, it can be seen that much valuable consideration has been constantly presented to carry out the fundamental ideal and basic framework concerning juvenile justice by ensuring appropriate procedures (‘due process’) for juveniles and promoting the healthy growth and development of juveniles. This point is considered to be significant in determining the direction of rational problem-solving in relation to the phenomenon of juvenile crime that we are facing in Korea.
Abstract
In Japan, the Family Court holds jurisdiction over all delinquent juveniles, which differs from juvenile justice system of Korea. However, there are many similarities to the Korean system, in regards to the principle of delinquency control and the characteristics of juvenile protection proceedings. In Japan, the ferocity of juvenile crimes has been seriously recognized, and there has been a discussion about the age of juveniles subject to the juvenile law. For Korea, which shares the problems of juvenile crime, it is useful to take a look at the reality of Japan's juvenile justice system and the challenges it faces, in order to suggest the direction of future policy. In Korea, discussions about juvenile justice policy that expands the application of criminal punishment as a reaction to a series of heinous juvenile crimes or violent juvenile crimes has been supported by the public and the media. Examining the discussion in Japan regarding the method and procedure of the decision to referral (remitment) to a prosecutor (Article 20 of Japan’s Juvenile Act), and the methods of holding criminal trials of juveniles after a remitment-to-prosecutor, it can be seen that much valuable consideration has been constantly presented to carry out the fundamental ideal and basic framework concerning juvenile justice by ensuring appropriate procedures (‘due process’) for juveniles and promoting the healthy growth and development of juveniles. This point is considered to be significant in determining the direction of rational problem-solving in relation to the phenomenon of juvenile crime that we are facing in Korea.
참고문헌 (43)
- 김은경, "21세기 소년사법 개혁과 회복적 사법의 가치", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.1159~1188 (2007), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 박영규, "소년사건처리의 적법절차에 관한 고찰", 소년보호연구, 29(1), pp.95~119 (2016), 한국소년정책학회
- 박호현, "소년법 개정논의에 대한 고찰 - 소년사법의 보호이념 강화를 중심으로 -", 동아법학, (78), pp.1~26 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 법원행정처, (2019)
- 오영근, "개정소년법의 과제와 전망", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.5~24 (2008), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 원혜욱, "소년형벌의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책연구, 17(4), pp.671~696 (2006), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 이규호, "소년형사범 처리의 개선방안", 보호관찰, 12(2), pp.353~393 (2012), 한국보호관찰학회
- 소년강력범죄에 대한 외국의 대응동향 및 정책 시사점 연구, "이승현", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2017)
- 이은영, "소년사법제도의 엄벌화 경향에 대한 비판적 고찰", 교정복지연구, (42), pp.25~60 (2016), 한국교정복지학회
- 이춘화, "소년형사사건 처리절차의 문제점과 개선방안", 한양법학, (29), pp.95~114 (2010), 한양법학회
- 홍태석, "일본의 개정 소년법과 우리나라 소년법의 개정방안", 원광법학, 27(1), pp.101~126 (2011), 법학연구소
- 鮎川潤, "少年法改正とエビデンスベイストポリシー", 犯罪社会学研究, (3) (2005)
- 荒木伸怡, "調布駅南口事件最高裁判決をどう読むか", 季刊刑事弁護, (13) (1998)
- 岩井宜子, "保護処分と刑事処分の関係について", 家庭裁判月報, 32(12) (1980)
- 大嵜康弘, "我が国における少年司法制度の現状と少年法適用年齢の引下げに関する課題", レファレンス, (801) (2017), 国立国会図書館 調査及び立法考査局
- 川出敏裕, "逆送規定の改正", 現代刑事法, (24) (2001)
- 葛野尋之, "少年法の展望-澤登俊雄先生古稀祝賀論文集" (2000)
- 葛野尋之, "少年司法における不利益変更禁止原則 - 新しい保護理念と少年審判を受ける権利", 法政研究, 2(2) (1997)
- 葛野尋之, "少年司法の再構築", ~ (2003)
- 葛野尋之, "少年事件の刑事裁判と公開原則", 刑事法ジャーナル, (21) (2010)
- 葛野尋之, "講座 国際人権法 2 国際人権規範の形成と展開" (2006)
- 葛野尋之, "少年法における検察官送致決定の意義 - 家庭裁判所の説明責任-", 立命館法学, (283) (2002)
- 葛野尋之, "少年法の展望 - 少年法における規範意識と責任", 犯罪と刑罰, (15) (2002)
- 斉藤豊治, "少年法研究1 適正手続と誤判救済", ~ (1997)
- 酒巻匡, "少年法の一部を改正する法律(下)", 法学教室, (249) (2001)
- 大塚仁博士古稀祝賀, "刑事法学の総合的検討(上) 福田平", pp.1993, 澤登俊雄
- 澤登俊雄, "入門少年法" (2001)
- 清水晴生, "保護相当判断にっいて", 白鴎法学, 18(2) (2011)
- 高田昭正, "保護処分決定に対する抗告と抗告審決定の効力", 法律時報, 67(7) (1995)
- 内匠舞, "少年法の適⽤年齢引下げをめぐる議論", 調査と情報 - ISSUE BRIEF, (963) (2017), 国立国会図書館 調査及び立法考査局
- 田宮裕廣瀬健二, "注釈少年法" (2001)
- 日本弁護士連合会, "改正少年法5年後見直しに関する意見書, 2006. 3. 16", ~ (2006)
- 日本弁護士連合会, "裁判員制度の下での少年逆送事件の審理のあり方に関する意見書, 2008. 12. 9", ~ (2008)
- 廣瀬健二, "非行事実の認定" (1997)
- 藤吉和史, "変貌する保護処分 - いわゆる原則逆送と年少少年の刑事処分をめぐって -", 法律論叢, 77(4- 5) (2005)
- 渕野貴生, "改正少年法における逆送後の刑事裁判の現状と課題", 刑法雑誌, 44(1) (2004)
- 前野育三, "少年司法における事実認定 - 非行事実と要保護性", 非行事実の認定, ~ (1997)
- 正木祐史, "逆送規定の合憲性(2) (完)", 一橋研究, 22(3), pp.3号~ (1997)
- 丸山雅夫, "少年刑事事件と裁判員裁判", 社会と倫理, (25) (2011)
- 丸山雅夫, "少年法適用年齢の引下げと刑事政策", 南山法学, 44(2) (2021)
- 守屋克彦, "‘少年法の改正と運用上の課題", 法律時報, 73(4) (2001)
- 山口直也, "少年刑事被告人の刑事裁判のあり方に関する一考察", 立命館法学, (331) (2010)
- 鷲尾祐喜義, "改正少年法の課題と展望", 人間の福祉, (244) (2010)