한국 소년사법제도의 발전방안
The Directions for the Development of the Korean Juvenile Justice System
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The latest juvenile delinquency statistics in Korea shows that while the juvenile crime has decreased due to various societal changes such as a decline in youth population, the high recidivism rates for youth offenders remained unchanged, recording at approximately 30%. The qualitative aspects of youth crime are rendering serious problems as the delinquent acts are becoming more atrocious and more organized. Additionally, the increase in the instances of younger-age crime is emerging as another grave issue for the society. Families and educational institutions which have the primary responsibility for educating and protecting juvenile delinquents can be deemed as the first one to be blamed for these problems. However, justice institutions are equally responsible for the problems since they have failed to carry out their duties to administer issues caused by juvenile delinquents. This contention is reinforced by 30% recidivism rate of juvenile offense. To state the conclusion, the juvenile justice institution responsible for the treatment of juvenile delinquents must establish the sound justice system for youth and efficiently manage the system in order to prevent the juvenile offense and the reoccurring offense as well. This article will first examine the current trend on offenses committed by adolescents; then analyze the problems faced by the juvenile justice system which governs juvenile crime law, juvenile justice institutions, procedures for juvenile criminal cases, and treatment programs for juvenile inmates; and finally propose the future-oriented direction for the development of Korean Juvenile Justice System. As for the directions for reformation in the management of juvenile justice institutions, the management by administrative experts on correction and the operation of privately-run law education centers have been presented. As for the directions for the improvement in the juvenile justice process, employing the restorative justice system, amalgamating the juvenile criminal procedure, establishing the compensatory system in juvenile correction cases, vitalizing the police diversion policy, and expunging juvenile criminal records have been proposed. Furthermore, as for the directions for the improvement on treatments of juvenile inmates, vitalizing the open treatment, enhancing correction and rehabilitation education, and crystallizing the system for the relief of individual rights have been suggested. Finally, for the conclusion, in order to achieve the juvenile justice system managed by administrative experts on correction, the adoption of the restorative justice has been strongly emphasized.
Abstract
The latest juvenile delinquency statistics in Korea shows that while the juvenile crime has decreased due to various societal changes such as a decline in youth population, the high recidivism rates for youth offenders remained unchanged, recording at approximately 30%. The qualitative aspects of youth crime are rendering serious problems as the delinquent acts are becoming more atrocious and more organized. Additionally, the increase in the instances of younger-age crime is emerging as another grave issue for the society. Families and educational institutions which have the primary responsibility for educating and protecting juvenile delinquents can be deemed as the first one to be blamed for these problems. However, justice institutions are equally responsible for the problems since they have failed to carry out their duties to administer issues caused by juvenile delinquents. This contention is reinforced by 30% recidivism rate of juvenile offense. To state the conclusion, the juvenile justice institution responsible for the treatment of juvenile delinquents must establish the sound justice system for youth and efficiently manage the system in order to prevent the juvenile offense and the reoccurring offense as well. This article will first examine the current trend on offenses committed by adolescents; then analyze the problems faced by the juvenile justice system which governs juvenile crime law, juvenile justice institutions, procedures for juvenile criminal cases, and treatment programs for juvenile inmates; and finally propose the future-oriented direction for the development of Korean Juvenile Justice System. As for the directions for reformation in the management of juvenile justice institutions, the management by administrative experts on correction and the operation of privately-run law education centers have been presented. As for the directions for the improvement in the juvenile justice process, employing the restorative justice system, amalgamating the juvenile criminal procedure, establishing the compensatory system in juvenile correction cases, vitalizing the police diversion policy, and expunging juvenile criminal records have been proposed. Furthermore, as for the directions for the improvement on treatments of juvenile inmates, vitalizing the open treatment, enhancing correction and rehabilitation education, and crystallizing the system for the relief of individual rights have been suggested. Finally, for the conclusion, in order to achieve the juvenile justice system managed by administrative experts on correction, the adoption of the restorative justice has been strongly emphasized.
참고문헌 (32)
- 강경래, "소년원 처우의 실효성 확보방안 -8호 처분과 일본의 특수단기처우와의 비교검토를 중심으로-", 소년보호연구, 14, pp.53~74 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
- 김용우, "형사정책" (2006), 박영사
- 김재민, "경찰의 소년범 다이버전 정책에 관한 고찰 - 회복적 사법 이념의 반영 가능성을 중심으로 -", 소년보호연구, 15, pp.219~252 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
- 류여해, "소년법상 소년사건의 처리방안에 관한 연구", 소년보호연구, 13, pp.285~307 (2009), 한국소년정책학회
- 박상열, "6호처분을 중심으로 본 소년보호처분의 문제점과 개선방안", 소년보호연구, 15, pp.193~218 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
- 박영규, "「1개월 이내의 소년원 송치처분」의 개선방안", 소년보호연구, 17, pp.59~90 (2011), 한국소년정책학회
- 박찬걸, "우리나라 소년범죄의 최근 동향에 대한 평가", 소년보호연구, 28(2), pp.83~125 (2015), 한국소년정책학회
- 백기완, "행정학" (1993), 박영사
- 범죄백서, "법무연수원", ~ (2014)
- 서울가정법원, "소년보호재판 운영실무", ~ (2008)
- 성우제, "8호처분의 운영성과 분석", 소년보호연구, 14, pp.1~52 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
- 송화숙, "청소년 비행예방센터의 실질적 성과분석 및 향후과제", 소년보호연구, (11) (2008), 한국소년정책학회
- 염기창, "소년보호처분의 실절적 강화방안", 가사소년제도 개혁위원회자료집(2) (2005), 서울가정법원, 가사소년제도 개혁위원회
- 오영근, "소년사법제도의 문제점 및 개선방안", 소년보호연구, (7) (2004), 한국소년정책학회
- 원혜욱, "소년비행예방센터의 현황과 과제", 소년보호연구, 12, pp.69~92 (2009), 한국소년정책학회
- 원혜욱, "외국의 회복적 사법제도의 고찰을 통한 우리나라 소년사법정책의 방향", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.307~324 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 이규호, "소년형사범 처리의 개선방안", 보호관찰, 12(2), pp.353~393 (2012), 한국보호관찰학회
- 소년원생의 생활실태 및 교육에 관한 연구, "이병기", 형사정책연구원, ~ (1995)
- 이승현, "소년보호사건에서 보상제도의 도입방안", 소년보호연구, 12, pp.47~68 (2009), 한국소년정책학회
- 소년원의 처우방안에 대한 연구 -8호 처분을 중심으로-, "이승현", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구총서10-08
- 이영근, "한국소년보호행정의 쇄신방안", 소년보호연구, (창간) (1999), 한국소년보호학회
- 이영근, "소년보호조직의 혁신과 개편방안", 소년보호연구, (7) (2004), 한국소년보호학회
- 이영란, "소년사법절차에 관한 연구 -소년경찰의 다이버전을 중심으로-", 소년보호연구, 15, pp.1~30 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
- 이용교, "소년교정기관에서의 상과 벌" (1994), 한국청소년개발연구원
- 이춘화, "소년사건에서의 조사제도에 관한 연구", 박사, 형사법, pp.2002
- 이훈재, "소년사건의 합리적 처리를 위한 개선방안 연구", 소년보호연구, 23, pp.189~218 (2013), 한국소년정책학회
- 장동근, "교정학" (1997), 육서당
- 정해룡, "소년분류심사제도의 운영실태와 발전방향", 소년보호연구, (5) (2003)
- 조규범, "소년보호처분제도의 문제점과 개선방안 -수탁기관을 중심으로-" (2008), 국회입법조사처
- 조기영, "소년사법과 적법절차의 원칙", 소년보호연구, 23, pp.219~251 (2013), 한국소년정책학회
- 조복전, "청소년보호정책" (2004), 한국범죄예방정책연구원
- 한영선, "개정소년법의 실효성 확보방안", 대한범죄학회발표자료 (2008)
