소년조사제도의 현황과 재범 예방에 관한 고찰
A study on Juvenile Investigation System and Prevention of Recidivism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Juvenile Investigation system has its role as a standard data of judicial judgment that can help young offenders to be protected, educated, and civilized. Additionally, by taking advantage of the recidivism risk assessment at the time of investigation, it is possible to predict the tendency of re-offense and the effects that can help preventing crimes in advance. Although the rate of recidivism is steadily increased, the Juvenile Investigation system is not changed but maintained its state as before. The purpose of this paper is not only to study the contents of the juvenile investigation system and its current situation in South Korea and abroad, but examine a few different types of programs related to recidivism risk and its current situation as well. It turned out that the investigation system which was supposed to be carried out sufficiently in various stages of the judicial system that actually has not enough rate of conduct due to the problem of lacked investigators and some other reasons. Even though there are professional investigation tools that have been verified enough, such tools were not being used properly and enough. At the end, it is concluded that what we need to pursue is proper intervention of experts, adequate training for investigators, and accurate usage of the tools.
Abstract
The Juvenile Investigation system has its role as a standard data of judicial judgment that can help young offenders to be protected, educated, and civilized. Additionally, by taking advantage of the recidivism risk assessment at the time of investigation, it is possible to predict the tendency of re-offense and the effects that can help preventing crimes in advance. Although the rate of recidivism is steadily increased, the Juvenile Investigation system is not changed but maintained its state as before. The purpose of this paper is not only to study the contents of the juvenile investigation system and its current situation in South Korea and abroad, but examine a few different types of programs related to recidivism risk and its current situation as well. It turned out that the investigation system which was supposed to be carried out sufficiently in various stages of the judicial system that actually has not enough rate of conduct due to the problem of lacked investigators and some other reasons. Even though there are professional investigation tools that have been verified enough, such tools were not being used properly and enough. At the end, it is concluded that what we need to pursue is proper intervention of experts, adequate training for investigators, and accurate usage of the tools.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강동욱, "소년사건 처리절차에 관한 고찰", 한양법학, 23(4), pp.11~35 (2012), 한양법학회
- 김은미, "재비험 위험성의 정도에 따른 비행촉발요인과 PAI의 영향요인", 디지털융복합연구, 12(2), pp.122~ (2014), 한국디지털정책학회
- 주요 국가의 소년보호관찰제도 연구 미국, 영국, 일본의 소년보호관찰제도를 중심으로-, "김양곤", 한국형사정책연구원, 41~43, pp.한국형사정책연구원 연구총서 04-12 (2004)
- 소년 보호관찰대상자에 대한 분류평가도구 개발에 관한 연구, "김양곤", 형사정책 연구회, 28~ (2010)
- 바람직한 양형조사 주체 및 조사방식에 관한 연구, "김일수", 대검찰청 공판송무부 공판송무과, 135~ (2009)
- 판결전조사제도의 현황과 개선방안, "김혜정", 한국형사정책연구원, 21~, pp.형사정책연구원 연구총서 02-24 (2002)
- 노혜선, "비행촉발요인조사서를 통한 소년범 재범 예측 연구 -생존분석을 중심으로-", 한국경찰연구, 17(4), pp.23~56 (2018), 한국경찰연구학회[DOI]
- "소년보호재판의 구체적인 절차"[URL]
- 양형조사제도에 관한 연구 조사기관을 중심으로-, "박경래", 한국형사정책연구회, 83~84, pp.연구총서 10-29 (2010)
- 박성수, "경찰단계에서의 소년범 위험성 평가에 의한 재범예측 연구 : 소년사건 처리시 전문가참여제", 한국치안행정논집, 9(1), pp.27~47 (2012), 한국치안행정학회[DOI]
- 박외병, "소년범에 대한 경찰 다이버전 운영에 관한 연구- 경찰 선도프로그램을 중심으로 -", 한국경찰연구, 13(2), pp.79~100 (2014), 한국경찰연구학회
- 박재원, "에니어그램 심리역동검사가 청소년의 자아개념에 미치는 영향-‘사랑의 교실’ 참가자를 중심으로", 에니어그램 심리역동연구, 3(1), pp.197~ (2016), 한국에니어그램역동심리학회
- 판결전조사 성과분석, "법무부 보호국", 11~12 (2010)
- 윤현석, "소년보호사건에서 조사제도의 실증적 평가분석을 통한 조사관 역할 및 기능 재정립 연구", 인문사회 21, 11(4), pp.2195~2204 (2020), 인문사회 21
- 이민식, "LSI-R을 이용한 성별·범죄유형별 재범유발요인", 형사정책연구, 20(1), pp.157~187 (2009), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 이상한, "소년형사사건에서 양형조사의 합리적 운영방안", 형사정책, 28(3), pp.125~151 (2016), 한국형사정책학회[DOI]
- 이승현, "소년보호처분의 유형별 진단 및 개선방안", 형사정책, 29(3), pp.7~34 (2017), 한국형사정책학회[DOI]
- 범죄소년 판결전조사 JDRAI 간략보고서, "이수정", 2~ (2020)
- 성인 판결전조사 활용, 재범위험성 평가도구 개발, "이수정", 서울보호관찰소, 3~ (2010)
- 이수정, "최신범죄심리학", pp.212~213 (2018), 학지사
- 이수정, "범죄위험성의 평가와 활용방안", 한국심리학회지:일반, 22(2), pp.99~126 (2003), 한국심리학회
- 이춘화, "소년법상의 검사 결정전 조사제도에 관한 연구", 형사정책연구, 20(2), pp.59~91 (2009), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- "광주경찰 ‘사랑의 교실’ 선도프로그램 재범률 감소 성과"[URL]
- 최석윤, "한국의 소년분류심사제도에 관한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.719~742 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회[DOI]
- 소년조사제도의 개선방안에 대한 연구, "홍영오", 한국형사정책연구원, 49~, pp.형사정책연구원 연구총서 11-07 (2011)
- "보호관찰관 1명당 청소년 167명 감독, 제대로 보호관찰 가능 할까?"[URL]
- "보호관찰 조사 현황"[URL]
- "보호관찰 현황"[URL]
- "보호소년 위탁소년 현황"[URL]
- The Presentence Investigation Report, "Administrative Office of the United States Courts", Appendix C Pg, 1~4 (2006)
- The History of the Pre-sentence Investigation Report, "Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice", 1~3 (2008)
- Martin Rettenberger, "The Predictive Accuracy of Risk Factors in the Sexual Violence Risk 20 (Svr-20)", ~ (2008)
- Jennifer K. Elek, "Using Risk and Needs Assessment Information at Sentencing: Observations from Ten Jurisdictions", 27~41 (2015)
- Laura S Guy, "Influence of the HCR-20, LS", CMI, and PCL-R on decisions about parole suitability among lifers, 2015
- Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing, "An Overview of the Sentence Risk Assessment Instrument", 2~ (2017)
- Thomas Gitchoff, Dr. G, "Private Presentence Investigations", 1~3 (1993)
- United States Probation Office District of Nevada, "PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION PROCESS", 2~