고대영어 매입절의 동사구어순과 명찰알고리듬
On the VP Word Order with the Labeling Algorithm in Old English Subordinate Clauses
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores how to derive the word order of Old English(OE) subordinate clauses via the labeling system(Chomsky, 2013), which provides a new perspective on the word order in question. AUX-V, V-AUX, AUX-V-O and AUX-O-V orders are derived in OE subordinate constructions where quantified and pronominal objects are not selected. After arguing that the headedness parameter approach cannot capture these word orders, we show that these word orders can be derived unproblematically within the labeling system(Chomsky, 2013), where given SO={AUX, V}, one of the SO moves out of the SO in order for minimal search to select the remaining head as the label. Thus AUX-V order is derived in {AUX, V} if AUX moves out of the SO whereas V-AUX order is done if V moves out of {AUX, V}. Next if an object NP is merged in the remaining VP, producing SO={VP, NP}, one of the SO moves out of the SO again in order for the label of the SO to be selected, thus deriving AUX-V-O or AUX-O-V respectively. The labeling system adopted here rules out V-O-AUX order which did not exist in OE by virtue of no feature sharing in {VP, NP} during the derivation.
Abstract
This paper explores how to derive the word order of Old English(OE) subordinate clauses via the labeling system(Chomsky, 2013), which provides a new perspective on the word order in question. AUX-V, V-AUX, AUX-V-O and AUX-O-V orders are derived in OE subordinate constructions where quantified and pronominal objects are not selected. After arguing that the headedness parameter approach cannot capture these word orders, we show that these word orders can be derived unproblematically within the labeling system(Chomsky, 2013), where given SO={AUX, V}, one of the SO moves out of the SO in order for minimal search to select the remaining head as the label. Thus AUX-V order is derived in {AUX, V} if AUX moves out of the SO whereas V-AUX order is done if V moves out of {AUX, V}. Next if an object NP is merged in the remaining VP, producing SO={VP, NP}, one of the SO moves out of the SO again in order for the label of the SO to be selected, thus deriving AUX-V-O or AUX-O-V respectively. The labeling system adopted here rules out V-O-AUX order which did not exist in OE by virtue of no feature sharing in {VP, NP} during the derivation.
참고문헌 (36)
- Taylor, A., "The York-Toronto -Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English" (2003), Department of University of York
- 김대익, "최소주의 관점의 고대영어어순고찰", 새한영어영문학, 57(3), pp.169~188 (2015), 새한영어영문학회
- Allen, C., "Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Bean, M. C., "The Development of Word Order Patterns in Old English" (1983), Barnes
- Biberauer, Theresa, "Limiting Synchronic and Diachronic Variation and Change", ms, pp.2010
- Canale, M., "Word Order Changer in Old English: Base Reanalysis in Generative Grammar", 박사, pp.1978
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT press
- Chomsky, N., "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~157 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection: Extensions", 석사, pp.2014
- Denison. D., "English Historical Syntax" (1995), Longman Publishing
- Epstein, S. D., "Phase Cancellation by External Pair-Merge of Heads", The Linguistic Review, 33(1), pp.87~102 (2016)
- Fisher, O, "The Syntax of Early English" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Gelderen, E. v., "The Rise of Functional Categories" (1993), John Benjamins
- Gorrell, J. H, "Indirect Discourse in Anglo-Saxon", PMLA, 10(3), pp.342~485 (1895)
- Haeberli, E, "On the Word Order ‘XP-Subject’ in the Germanic Languages", Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 3, pp.1~36 (1999)
- Haeberli, E, "Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change", pp.88~106 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Heggelund, Øystein, "On the Use of Data in Historical Linguistics: Word Order in Early English Subordinate Clauses", 석사, pp.2014
- Hulk, A, "Clause Structure and Language Change", pp.3~28 (1995), Oxford University Press
- Kemenade, A. van., "Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English" (1987), Foris
- Kipalsky, P, "Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change", pp.460~494 (1997), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Kroch, A., "Verb-Object Order in Early Middle English", 석사, pp.2000
- Lasnik, H., "Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structures Meets the Minimalist Program", 석사, pp.1994
- Lightfoot, D., "Principle of Diachronic Syntax" (1979), Univ. Press
- Lightfoot. D., "How New language Emerge" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Pintzuk, S, "Verb Seconding in Old English: Verb Movement to INFL", The Linguistic Review, 10, pp.5~35 (1993)
- Pintzuk, S., "Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order" (1999), Garland
- Pintzuk, S, "Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change", pp.276~299 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Pintzuk, S, "Argument Against a Universal Base: Evidence from Old English", English Language and Linguistics, 9, pp.115~138 (2005)
- Pintzuk, S., "Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes", pp.219~238 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Pintzuk, S., "The Handbook of the History of English", pp.281~338 (2005), Blackwell Publishing
- Stockwell, R., "Mechanics of Syntactic Change", pp.394~421 (1977), University of Texas Press
- Traugott, E., "A History of English Syntax" (1972), Holt, Reinhart and Winston
- Trips, C., "From OV to VO in Early Middle English" (2002), John Benjamins
- Lightfoot, D., "How to Set Parameter: Arguments from Language Change" (1991), MIT Press
- Lightfoot, D., "The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution" (1999), Blackwell