어순공리와 핵매개변인-고대영어 하위절을 중심으로
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The subordinate clause in Old English (OE) exhibits 5 different surface word orders such as AUX-V-O, AUX-O-V, V-AUX-O, O-AUX-O, O-V-AUX with regard to the positions among AUX, V and O but the order V-O-AUX is not found. It is proposed in this article that OE subordinate word orders are derived via the application of Object Shift and V(AUX)-raising on the assumption that the base order of Old English is uniformly AUX/V-O. The assumption is based on the Linear Correspondence Axiom (LCA), which requires linearization between two syntactic objects by asymmetric c-commanding. In the meantime, the V-O-AUX order is denied by the FOFC that rules out the possibility of a head-final phrase dominating a head-initial phrase.
Abstract
The subordinate clause in Old English (OE) exhibits 5 different surface word orders such as AUX-V-O, AUX-O-V, V-AUX-O, O-AUX-O, O-V-AUX with regard to the positions among AUX, V and O but the order V-O-AUX is not found. It is proposed in this article that OE subordinate word orders are derived via the application of Object Shift and V(AUX)-raising on the assumption that the base order of Old English is uniformly AUX/V-O. The assumption is based on the Linear Correspondence Axiom (LCA), which requires linearization between two syntactic objects by asymmetric c-commanding. In the meantime, the V-O-AUX order is denied by the FOFC that rules out the possibility of a head-final phrase dominating a head-initial phrase.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김대익, "고대영어동사의 위치와 도출구조", 언어, 33(3), pp.367~385 (2008), 한국언어학회
- Sang-sooPark, "A Diachronic Approach to Bare Infinitives", 현대문법연구, 28(28), pp.129~150 (2002), 현대문법학회
- 이필환, "영어통시통사론" (1999), 한국문화사
- Bean,M.C, "The development of word order patterns in Old English" (1983), Croom Helm
- Biberauer, T, "Changing EPP parameters in the history of English,In Accounting for variation and change", English Language and Linguistics, 9, pp.5~46 (2005)
- Biberauer, T., "Dishamonic word order system and the Final Over Final Constrain" (2008), University of Cambridge
- Biberauer, T, "Limiting synchronic and diachronic variation and change. Unpublished manuscript" (2009), University of Cambridge
- Canale,M, "Word order changer in Old English: Base reanalysis in Generative Grammar", 박사, pp.1978
- Chomsky,N, "On phase" (2005), MIT
- Fox, D., "Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure" (2004), MIT
- Gelderen, E. van, "The rise of functional categories" (1993), John Benjamins
- Haeberli, F., "Clausal structure in Old English: Evidence from negative concord", Journal of Linguistics, 31, pp.81~108 (1995)
- Holmberg, A, "Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization", Studia Lingustica, 53, pp.1~39 (1999)
- Holmberg, A, "The derivation of VO and OV", pp.123~152 (2000), OUP
- Kayne,R, "Antisymmetry" (1994), MIT
- Kayne,R, "Why are there no directionality parameter? Unpublished manuscript" (2010), New York University
- Kemenade,A.van, "Syntactic Case and morphological Case in the history of English" (1987), Foris
- Lightfoot,D, "Principle of diachronic syntax" (1979), Cambridge University
- Lightfoot,D, "How to set parameter,In Arguments from language change.Cambridge" (1991), MIT
- Mossé,F, "Manual of Middle English" (1968), Johns Hopkins
- Nunes,J, "Syntactic effects of morphological change", pp.300~306 (2002), Oxford University
- Pintzuk,S, "Syntactic effects of morphological change", pp.276~299 (2002), Oxford University
- Pintzuk,S, "Argument against a universal base,In Evidence from Old English", English Language and Linguistics, 9, pp.115~138 (2005)
- Roberts, I, "Parameters of morphosyntactic change", pp.397~426 (1997), Cambridge University
- Sheehan, M, "Explaining the Final Over Final constraint: Formal and functional approaches" (2009), University of Durham