최근 최소주의에 입각한 고대영어와 현대영어 어순 차이의 통합적 설명
Toward a unified explanation of word order differences in Old English and Present-Day English in recent Minimalism
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kim, Daeik. (2017). Toward a unified explanation of word order differences in Old English and Present-Day English in recent Minimalism. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(3), 113-132. The aim of this paper is to give an explanatory account of the differences in word order between Old English (OE) and Present-Day English (PE) in terms of the labeling algorithm advocated in Chomsky (2013, 2014). It has been argued in recent proposals that, with VO order in the main clause, OE exhibits OV or VO order in similar proportion in subordinate clauses where previous accounts considered only OV order to be a basic order. Given this revision, I propose that the differences in word order between OE and PE be attributed to the merge type in VP (VP-NP merge in OE vs. V-NP merge in PE), the difference in the number of the phases (monophase CP in OE vs. CP and vP phases in PE), and the status of feature inheritance (no feature inheritance in OE vs. feature inheritance in PE) when the label of the merge {X,Y} is determined in the labeling algorithm where sub-algorithms, such as minimal search and feature sharing, are activated.
Abstract
Kim, Daeik. (2017). Toward a unified explanation of word order differences in Old English and Present-Day English in recent Minimalism. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(3), 113-132. The aim of this paper is to give an explanatory account of the differences in word order between Old English (OE) and Present-Day English (PE) in terms of the labeling algorithm advocated in Chomsky (2013, 2014). It has been argued in recent proposals that, with VO order in the main clause, OE exhibits OV or VO order in similar proportion in subordinate clauses where previous accounts considered only OV order to be a basic order. Given this revision, I propose that the differences in word order between OE and PE be attributed to the merge type in VP (VP-NP merge in OE vs. V-NP merge in PE), the difference in the number of the phases (monophase CP in OE vs. CP and vP phases in PE), and the status of feature inheritance (no feature inheritance in OE vs. feature inheritance in PE) when the label of the merge {X,Y} is determined in the labeling algorithm where sub-algorithms, such as minimal search and feature sharing, are activated.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김대익, "최소주의 관점의 고대영어어순고찰", 새한영어영문학, 57(3), pp.169~188 (2015), 새한영어영문학회
- 김대익, "명찰이론에서의 동사이동과 국면", 새한영어영문학, 58(2), pp.153~171 (2016), 새한영어영문학회
- 김대익, "고대영어 매입절의 동사구어순과 명찰알고리듬", 언어과학, 24(1), pp.1~20 (2017), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- Borer, H., "The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax", pp.112~148 (2014), Oxford University Press
- Bean, M. C., "The development of word order patterns in Old English" (1983), Croom Helm
- Canale, M., "Word order changer in Old English: Base reanalysis in generative grammar", doctor, pp.1978
- Chomsky, N., "The View from building 20. Essay in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~157 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "On phase", pp.2005
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of projection: extensions", pp.2014
- Epstein, S. D., "Phase cancellation by external pair-merge of heads", The Linguistic Review, 33(1), pp.87~102 (2016)
- Fisher, O., "The syntax of early English" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Haeberli, E., "Grammatical change:origins, nature, outcomes", pp.219~238 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Heggelund, Ø., "On the use of data in historical linguistics: Word order in early English subordinate clauses", pp.2014
- Hulk, A., "Clause structure and language change" (1995), Oxford University Press
- 이정식, "The SVO Hypothesis in Korean: Word Order Variation, Head Movement and Linearization", 언어학, 23(4), pp.63~90 (2015), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- Kayne, R., "The antisymmetry of syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kemenade, A. van., "Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English" (1987), Foris
- Kroch, A., "Verb-object order in early Middle English", pp.2000
- Lasnik, H., "Verbal morphology: Syntactic structures meets the minimalist program", pp.1994
- Lightfoot, D., "Principle of diachronic syntax" (1979), Cambridge University Press
- Lightfoot, D., "How to set parameter: arguments from language change" (1991), MIT Press
- Lightfoot, D., "The development of language: acquisition, change and evolution" (1999), Blackwell
- Pintzuk, S., "Verb seconding in Old English : verb movement to INFL", The Linguistic Review, 10, pp.5~35 (1993)
- Pintzuk, S., "Phrase structures in competition: variation and change in Old English word order" (1999), Garland
- Pintzuk, S., "Syntactic effects of morphological change", pp.276~299 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Pintzuk, S., "Verb order, object position and information status in Old English", pp.2002
- Roberts, I., "Parameters of morphosyntactic change", pp.397~426 (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Traugott, E., "A history of English syntax" (1972), Holt, Reinhart and Winston
- Trips, C., "From OV to VO in early Middle English" (2002), Benjamins