최소주의에서의 고대영어 동사와 목적어의 표면 어순
The Surface Orders of OE Verbs and Objects in the Minimalist Program
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With exhibiting the word order of subordinate clauses in Old English (OE) with regard to the positions between AUX and V in association with the optional nominal object movement, We show how these surface word orders have been derived in the minimalist program(including Generative grammar). In this article we try to show how OE surface word orders concerning verb, AUX and object are derived from the minimalist frameworks(from head parameter to labeling identifying approach). First, OE subordinate word orders are derived from the head parameter approach where the base order of Old English is uniformly OV(head final) or VO(head initial). Second, these word orders are derived from the complex head parameter approach in which OV or VO order is derived by dual property(head-initial and head-final) of TP and VP in OE. Third, these word orders are derived from the Linear Correspondence Axiom (LCA) approach in which linearization is required between two syntactic objects by asymmetric c-commanding The last one is the label identifying approach in which AUX or V should be moved in order to determine its label that GP recognizes. In the meantime, it is said that the optional postverbal object appears in OE by the dependance of nominal objects on AUX movement, a kind of Holmberg’s Generalization.
Abstract
With exhibiting the word order of subordinate clauses in Old English (OE) with regard to the positions between AUX and V in association with the optional nominal object movement, We show how these surface word orders have been derived in the minimalist program(including Generative grammar). In this article we try to show how OE surface word orders concerning verb, AUX and object are derived from the minimalist frameworks(from head parameter to labeling identifying approach). First, OE subordinate word orders are derived from the head parameter approach where the base order of Old English is uniformly OV(head final) or VO(head initial). Second, these word orders are derived from the complex head parameter approach in which OV or VO order is derived by dual property(head-initial and head-final) of TP and VP in OE. Third, these word orders are derived from the Linear Correspondence Axiom (LCA) approach in which linearization is required between two syntactic objects by asymmetric c-commanding The last one is the label identifying approach in which AUX or V should be moved in order to determine its label that GP recognizes. In the meantime, it is said that the optional postverbal object appears in OE by the dependance of nominal objects on AUX movement, a kind of Holmberg’s Generalization.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김대익, "고대영어동사의 위치와 도출구조", 언어, 33(3), pp.367~385 (2008), 한국언어학회
- 김대익, "고대영어의 이중 목적어 구문 도출", 새한영어영문학, 51(4), pp.143~162 (2009), 새한영어영문학회
- 김대익, "어순공리와 핵매개변인-고대영어 하위절을 중심으로", 언어학, 19(4), pp.173~189 (2011), 대한언어학회
- 김대익, "고대영어 동사-불변화사와 어순", 언어과학, 20(2), pp.13~30 (2013), 한국언어과학회
- 이필환, "영어통시통사론" (1999), 한국문화사
- Allen, C., "Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Bean, C., "The Development of Word Order Patterns in Old English" (1983), Croom Helm
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~157 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "On Phase", 석사, pp.2005
- Chomsky, N., "Approaching UG from Below", 석사, pp.2006
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Canale, M., "Word Order Changer in Old English: Base Reanalysis in Generative Grammar", 박사, pp.1978
- Lightfoot, D., "Principle of Diachronic Syntax" (1979), Cambridge University. Press
- Lightfoot, D., "How to Set Parameter: Arguments from Language Change" (1991), MIT Press
- Haeberli, E, "Structural Variation in Old English Root Clauses", Language Variation and Change, 20, pp.367~407 (2008)
- Haeberli, E, "Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes", pp.219~238 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Holmberg, A., "Remarks on Holmberg’s Generalization", Studia Lingustica, 53, pp.1~39 (1999)
- Kayne, R. S., "Antisymmetry" (1994), MIT Press
- Kemenade, v., "Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English" (1987), Foris
- Koopman, F., "Word Order in Old English; with Special Reference to the Verb Phrase", 박사, pp.1990
- Kroch, A., "Diachronic Syntax: Model and Mechanism", pp.132~163 (2000), Oxford University Press
- Pintzuk, S., "Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change", pp.276~299 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Pintzuk, S., "Arguments Against a Universal Base: Evidence from Old English. English Language and Linguistics 9", pp.115~138 (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Pintzuk, S., "The Handbook of the History of English", pp.249~278 (2005), Blackwell
- Roberts, I., "Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change", pp.397~426 (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Stockwell, R., "Mechanics of Syntactic Change" (1977), University of Texas Press
- Swanton, M., "The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle" (1996), Moulton
- Traugott, E., "A History of English Syntax" (1972), Holt, Reinhart and Winston