한국어의 무표형과 ‘들’-복수형의 의미
A Study on theMeaning of Korean -marked and 'tul'-marked Nouns
0
조회
0
다운로드
25
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the existing accounts of Korean Φ-marked and 'tul‘-marked nouns. Korean nouns (or noun phrases) with and without the plural marker 'tul' have been analysed as plurals and claimed to mean sum and group interpretations, respectively. We claim that Φ-marked nouns are singular and Φ-marked noun phrases, without a plural marker or a quantifier indicating plurality, are used to refer to a single reference (referential use) or to mean a thing that is attributed to by the noun phrase (attributive use). In addition, through corpus analysis, we show that Φ-marked bare noun phrases are not used with 'moita (’gather‘)' as often as has been claimed. We also show that 'tul' has been used increasingly, specially for number agreement. Finally, a numeral and 'tul' are seldom used together. Since numerals have more information than the plural marker, using 'tul' along with a numeral takes more processing effort without additional cognitive effects.
Abstract
This paper examines the existing accounts of Korean Φ-marked and 'tul‘-marked nouns. Korean nouns (or noun phrases) with and without the plural marker 'tul' have been analysed as plurals and claimed to mean sum and group interpretations, respectively. We claim that Φ-marked nouns are singular and Φ-marked noun phrases, without a plural marker or a quantifier indicating plurality, are used to refer to a single reference (referential use) or to mean a thing that is attributed to by the noun phrase (attributive use). In addition, through corpus analysis, we show that Φ-marked bare noun phrases are not used with 'moita (’gather‘)' as often as has been claimed. We also show that 'tul' has been used increasingly, specially for number agreement. Finally, a numeral and 'tul' are seldom used together. Since numerals have more information than the plural marker, using 'tul' along with a numeral takes more processing effort without additional cognitive effects.
참고문헌 (18)
- 강범모, "양화 의미: 복수, 물질, 타입. 강범모 외 공저, 형식의미론과 한국어 기술" (1999), 한신문화사
- 강범모, "복수성과 복수 표지: ‘들’을 중심으로", 언어학, 47, pp.3~31 (2007)
- 박철우, "국어 총칭문의 의미 해석과 문장 구조 분석. 이정민 외 편, 의미구조와 통사구조 그리고 그 너머" (2005), 한국문화사
- 백미현, "한국어 복수 의미 연구", 담화와 인지, 9(2), pp.59~78 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
- 임홍빈, "복수 표지 ‘들’의 사건성", pp.3~50 (2000), 애산학보
- 전영철, "한국어의 복수성과 총칭성", 한정성, 2004, pp.8(2), 27~46[DOI]
- Carlson, Gregory N., "The generic book" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Chierchia,Genaro, "to kinds across languages", pp.339~405 (1998), Natural Language Semantics 6
- Donnellan,Keith, "Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75, 281-304. (Reprinted in Pragmatics: A reader,ed", pp.52~64 (1966), Oxford University Press
- Grice,H.Paul, "Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Horn,Laurence, "Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity", pp.121~174 (1985), Language 61
- Kwak,Eun-Joo, "Interpretations of plural phrases in Korean", Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korean, 35, pp.3~36 (2003)
- attributive: a contextual proposal, "Referential", pp.1989, R?anati,Francois
- R?anati,Francois, "Direct Reference: from language to thought" (1993), Blackwell
- attributive distinction, "On the referential", pp.1992, Rouchota,Villy
- Rouchota,Villy, "On indefinite descriptions", Journal of Linguistics, 30, pp.441~475 (1994)
- Searle,John, "Referential and attributive", pp.109~208 (1979), Monist 62
- Sperber, Dan, "Relevance: Communication and cognition" (1996), Blackwell