본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘-Tul’ in Korean not as an Additive but an Associative Plural Marker

3

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper argues that the nominal suffix ‘-tul’ in Korean does not form an additive plural but rather an associative plural (AP). We first examine ‘-tul’ on pronouns and proper nouns in Korean, which makes a strong case for the analysis of ‘-tul’ as an AP marker. We also note that ‘-tul’ on common nouns in Korean not only gives rise to an AP reading, but also an additive plural-like reading. We suggest that the latter reading arises because complying with its semantico-pragmatic characterization, ‘-tul’ takes as a focal referent one specific member in the set of all possible referents denoted by a common noun, still associating the member at hand with other members in the set. Concurrently, we argue that unlike its English counterpart composed of phi-features, Korean ‘-tul’ composed of pragmatic features adjoins to the periphery of a nominal projection that Ritter and Wiltschko (2019) postulate as a nominal Ground Phrase.

Abstract

This paper argues that the nominal suffix ‘-tul’ in Korean does not form an additive plural but rather an associative plural (AP). We first examine ‘-tul’ on pronouns and proper nouns in Korean, which makes a strong case for the analysis of ‘-tul’ as an AP marker. We also note that ‘-tul’ on common nouns in Korean not only gives rise to an AP reading, but also an additive plural-like reading. We suggest that the latter reading arises because complying with its semantico-pragmatic characterization, ‘-tul’ takes as a focal referent one specific member in the set of all possible referents denoted by a common noun, still associating the member at hand with other members in the set. Concurrently, we argue that unlike its English counterpart composed of phi-features, Korean ‘-tul’ composed of pragmatic features adjoins to the periphery of a nominal projection that Ritter and Wiltschko (2019) postulate as a nominal Ground Phrase.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 안덕호, "On some expressions of plurality in Korean and their implications: With reference to Chinese and Japanese", 언어연구, 33(2), pp.205~227 (2016), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  2. Chacón, Dustin, "Bangla and company: The Distribution of associative plurals in Bangla, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese", A handout in FASAL I (2011)
  3. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, "Handbook of Comparative Syntax", pp.259~295 (2005), Oxford University Press
  4. "Doctor", Moscow University, 2000
  5. Daniel, Michael, "The world atlas of language structures", pp.150~153 (2005), Oxford University Press
  6. Dasgupta, Probal, "On the Bangla classifier-ta, its penumbra and definiteness", Indian Linguistics, 44, pp.10~26 (1983)
  7. Dayal, Veneeta, "Bangla classifiers: Mediating between kinds and objects", Italian Journal of Linguistics, 24(2), pp.195~226 (2012)
  8. Dikmen, F., "Associative plurality in Turkish", Procedings of the 15th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL15), pp.15~27 (2021), The MIT Press
  9. A study on plural marker -tul in Korean: based on the number mismatches in binding relations, "Hoe, Semoon", KRF, ~ (2018)
  10. 전영철, "한국어 복수 표현의 의미론: ‘들’의 통합적 해석", 언어학, (49), pp.337~359 (2007), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  11. 전영철, "한국어 집합 명사와 복수 표지 ‘들’", 어학연구, 51(3), pp.793~814 (2015), 언어교육원
  12. Kim, Kyumin, "The nature of associative plurality in Korean: Accounting for ‘-ney’ and ‘-tul’", Japanese, 2010, pp.19, 283~296
  13. Lee, Ik-Seop, "Lectures on Korean Grammar" (1999), Hakyeonsa
  14. Lewis, Rebecca, "Associative plural and DP", NP typology, 2021, pp.6, 50~47
  15. Li, Yen-hui Audrey, "Plurality in a classifier language", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, pp.75~99 (1999)
  16. 임동훈, "복수의 형식과 의미", 한국어 의미학, 39, pp.25~49 (2012), 한국어의미학회
  17. Meakins, Felicity, "The survey of pidgin and creole languages, vol. 3: Contact languages based on languages from Africa, Australia, and the Americas", pp.131~139 (2013), Oxford University
  18. Moravcsik, Edith, "A semantic analysis of associative plurals", Studies in Language, 27, pp.469~503 (2003)
  19. Nakanishi, Kimiko, "Japanese plurals are exceptional", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, pp.113~140 (2004)
  20. Nakanish, Kimiko, "Pseudo-additivity of Japanese plurals", Japanese, 2020, pp.27, ~
  21. Nakanishi, Kimiko, "Plurals in languages without count-mass Distinction", Handout in Mass-Count workshop (2008), University of Toronto
  22. 박명관, "Context Sensitivity, Late Merge, and the Plural Marker ‘-tul’ in Korean", 언어, 47(4), pp.727~751 (2022), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  23. Park, So-Young, "Two types of plurals and numeral classifiers in classifier languages: the case of Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 31, pp.139~177 (2022)
  24. Ritter, Elizabeth, "the Syntax of formality: Universals and variation", Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, pp.1~14 (2019)
  25. Ueda, Yasuki, "Plurality in Japanese and Chinese", Nanzan Linguistics: Special Issue, 3(2), pp.229~242 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)