On the Distribution of the Korean Plural Marker tul
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The distribution of the Korean Plural Marker tul is quite peculiar in many respects. First, it can be attached to mass nouns and non-nominal categories as well as count nouns. Second, some phrases with the marker tul can occur in the subject position only. Third, classifiers are required even for the nouns that tul can be attached to. There are also so many other distributional peculiarities of the tul-phrases. This paper claims that the distributional restrictions of the tul-phrase can be explained in terms of distributivity and a continuum in the count-mass domain.
Abstract
The distribution of the Korean Plural Marker tul is quite peculiar in many respects. First, it can be attached to mass nouns and non-nominal categories as well as count nouns. Second, some phrases with the marker tul can occur in the subject position only. Third, classifiers are required even for the nouns that tul can be attached to. There are also so many other distributional peculiarities of the tul-phrases. This paper claims that the distributional restrictions of the tul-phrase can be explained in terms of distributivity and a continuum in the count-mass domain.
참고문헌 (18)
- Baek, Mihyun, "A study on Korean Plural senses", Discourse and cognition, 9(2), pp.59~78 (2002)
- Chierchia, Gennaro, "Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of semantic parameter, in: Events and grammar", pp.53~103 (1998), Kluwer
- Choi, Jae-woong, "Anti-quantifiers and a theory of distributivity", 박사, pp.1987
- Joh,Yoon Kyoung, "Plurality and distributivity", A paper presented at 2008 winter conference of Korean Society for Language and Information (2008)
- Kang, Bem-mo, "Plurality and other semantic aspects of common nouns in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.1~24 (1994)
- Kim, Yookyung, "A non-spurious account of ‘spurious’ Korean plurals, in: Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics", pp.303~323 (1994), Center for the Study of Language and Information
- feature under C of CP, "언어", 2007, 27~62, pp.한국언어학회
- Kwak, Eun-joo, "Whole as a semantic pluralizer", Language and Information, 12(1), pp.67~83
- Irene Heim, "Reciprocity and plurality", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.63~102 (1991)
- Irene Heim, "On Reciprocal scope", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.173~192 (1991)
- Li, Audrey, "Plurality in a classifier language", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, pp.75~99 (1999)
- Noh, Eunju, "A study on the meaning of Korean -marked and ‘tul’ -marked nouns", Discourse and Cognition, 15(1), pp.43~62 (2008)
- Park, So-Young, "So-called plural marking tul and distributivity, in: Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI", pp.697~710 (2006)
- Song, Jae Jung, "The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus", Journal of Pragmatics, 27(2), pp.203~224 (1997)
- Williams, Edwin, "Thematic structure in syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Yim, Changguk, "The Morphology of event plurality in Korean, in: Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VIII", pp.669~682 (2002)
- Watanabe, Akira, "Functional projections of nominals in Japanese syntax of classifiers", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 24, pp.241~306 (2006)
- count distinction from a syntactic perspective, "The mass", pp.2008, Zribi-Hertz, Anne