『문학동네』의 ‘90년대’와 ‘386세대’의 한국 문학
The ‘90s’ in the Literary Community and ‘386 Generation’s Korean Literature
0
조회
0
다운로드
30
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Literaryism, which is typified by the Literary Community, is the common sense of criticism that is understood as the restoration of the autonomy of literature, which was suppressed by the literary movement as the 1980s. However, can we say that ‘literaryism’ and 'the mind of the 1990s’ which made it possible was really a lot changed by overcoming the literary of the 80s or the mind of the 80s nicely. This article begins with these questions. The critics of the Literary Community in the 1990s focused their efforts on discovering the points of reflection that the novelty was aiming at rather than proving the ‘newness’ of literature in the 1990s. In other words, what they noticed was how to prove how the former could become an alternative to the latter rather than testify to how the 90s literary breaks up nicely with literature in the 1980s. The fact that Seo Youngchae can not but summon the 80s to interpret the Lonely Room as changing the flow of Korean literature history in his recent writing means that the criterion of Literary Community criticism is still in the 1980s and ‘long 1990’s’ eventually can be fully explained in relation to the ‘long 1980’s’.
Abstract
Literaryism, which is typified by the Literary Community, is the common sense of criticism that is understood as the restoration of the autonomy of literature, which was suppressed by the literary movement as the 1980s. However, can we say that ‘literaryism’ and 'the mind of the 1990s’ which made it possible was really a lot changed by overcoming the literary of the 80s or the mind of the 80s nicely. This article begins with these questions. The critics of the Literary Community in the 1990s focused their efforts on discovering the points of reflection that the novelty was aiming at rather than proving the ‘newness’ of literature in the 1990s. In other words, what they noticed was how to prove how the former could become an alternative to the latter rather than testify to how the 90s literary breaks up nicely with literature in the 1980s. The fact that Seo Youngchae can not but summon the 80s to interpret the Lonely Room as changing the flow of Korean literature history in his recent writing means that the criterion of Literary Community criticism is still in the 1980s and ‘long 1990’s’ eventually can be fully explained in relation to the ‘long 1980’s’.
참고문헌 (27)
- 서영채, "냉소주의, 죽음, 매저키즘: 90년대 소설에 대한 한 성찰: 신경숙, 윤대녕, 장정일, 은희경의 소설을 중심으로", 문학동네, 22 (2000)
- 황종연, "비루한 것의 카니발: 90년대 소설의 한 단면", 문학동네, 22 (2000)
- 신수정, "푸줏간에 걸린 고기: 신인(新人)의 탄생", 문학동네, 22 (2000)
- 류보선, "역사와 기억, 그 영원한 화두", 문학동네, 22 (2000)
- 서영채, "신경숙의 『외딴방』과 1990년대의 마음", 문학동네, 90 (2017)
- 신수정, "다시 문학이란 무엇인가", 문학동네, 22 (2000)
- 신수정, "좌담발제문: 다시 문학이란 무엇인가", 문학동네, 22 (2000)
- 권성우, "대중문화시대의 문학비평, 그 불우한 자존심의 운명", 문학동네, 7 (1996)
- 이성욱, "비평의 길", 문학동네, 21 (1999)
- 소영현, "좀비비평의 미래", 문학과사회, 100 (2012)
- 김영찬, "비평의 우울" (2011), 문예중앙
- 배하은, "만들어진 내면성 - 김영현과 장정일의 소설을 통해 본 1990년대 초 문학의 내면성 구성과 전복 양상", 한국현대문학연구, (50), pp.547~585 (2016), 한국현대문학회[DOI]
- 김영찬, "‘90년대’는 없다하나의 시론試論, ‘1990년대’를 읽는 코드", 한국학논집, (59), pp.7~27 (2015), 한국학연구원[DOI]
- 황종연, "『늪을 건너는 법』 혹은 포스트모던 로만스-소설의 탄생", 문학동네, 89, pp.365~ (2016)
- 남진우, "숲으로 된 성벽", pp.410~ (1999), 문학동네
- 한국에서의 무라카미 하루키(村上春樹), "일본연구", 2007, 27~41, pp.글로벌일본연구원
- 사이토 미나코, "문단 아이돌론" (2017), 한겨레 출판
- 천정환, "창비와 '신경숙'이 만났을 때 - 1990년대 한국 문학장의 재편과 여성문학의 발흥", 역사비평, (112), pp.278~301 (2015), 역사문제연구소
- 김홍중, "마음의 사회학", pp.420~ (2009), 문학동네
- 천정환, "그 많던 ‘외치는 돌멩이’들은 어디로 갔을까―1980~90년대 노동자문학회와 노동자 문학", 역사비평, (106), pp.173~205 (2014), 역사문제연구소
- 이혜령, "빛나는 성좌들 - 1980년대, 여성해방문학의 탄생", 상허학보, 47, pp.409~454 (2016), 상허학회[DOI]
- 조연정, "1980년대 문학에서 여성운동과 민중운동의 접점 -고정희 시를 읽기 위한 시론(試論)-", 우리말글, 71, pp.241~273 (2016), 우리말글학회[DOI]
- 김원, "80년대에 대한 ‘기억’과 ‘장기 80년대’ －지식인들의 80년대 해석을 중심으로－", 한국학연구, (36), pp.9~49 (2015), 한국학연구소
- 황종연, "비루한 것의 카니발" (2001), 문학동네
- 이성욱, "비평의 길" (1999), 문학동네
- 서영채, "역설의 생산: 문학성에 대한 성찰, 2009", 문학동네, (봄) (2009)
- 서영채, "미메시스의 꿈", pp.105~ (2012), 문학동네