본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Strategic Group Approach for Six SOEs at China’s Automobile Industry

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study accessed China’s automobile industry through the strategic group theory. Strategic group means a group of firms that pursue the same or similar strategy at the specific industry. Most of all it concentrated on the market control power of big Six SOEs (State Owned Enterprises) of China; SAIC, FAW, DFM, ChangAn, BAG, GAIG, and analyzed the possibility for making them as a strategic group. To do so this study picked out main factors to access the potential barriers for grouping Six SOEs by applying three categories of mobility barriers suggested by Mcgee & Thomas. Firstly, at the governance structure analysis for Six SOEs, as a source of the category for individual firm specific characteristics, Six SOEs have dominated almost all of the alliances relationship with global makers while taking the institutional supports of local governments. However the revenue to profit ratios for Six SOEs did not agree with the nature of a strategic group. Secondly, at the market share trend or economies of scale for Six SOEs, as a source of the category for industry supply characteristics, total market share of Six SOEs has expanded continuously since 2004 without admitting any other makers to enter top six ranking. But the market share difference of inner group is hard to be explained only through strategic group characteristics. Thirdly, at the passenger car price strategy of JVs under Six SOEs or at the market-related strategies, three strategic groups; high price, middle price and low price group were confirmed through the correlation between the group median for average prices of car makers and the group median for revenue to profit ratios from 2007 to 2012. It was relatively very clear to differentiate JVs under Six SOEs from local makers through the passenger car price. Therefore it can be said that mobility barriers by market segmentation or brand recognition of JV makers is so high as to segregate Six SOEs as one strategic group.

Abstract

This study accessed China’s automobile industry through the strategic group theory. Strategic group means a group of firms that pursue the same or similar strategy at the specific industry. Most of all it concentrated on the market control power of big Six SOEs (State Owned Enterprises) of China; SAIC, FAW, DFM, ChangAn, BAG, GAIG, and analyzed the possibility for making them as a strategic group. To do so this study picked out main factors to access the potential barriers for grouping Six SOEs by applying three categories of mobility barriers suggested by Mcgee & Thomas. Firstly, at the governance structure analysis for Six SOEs, as a source of the category for individual firm specific characteristics, Six SOEs have dominated almost all of the alliances relationship with global makers while taking the institutional supports of local governments. However the revenue to profit ratios for Six SOEs did not agree with the nature of a strategic group. Secondly, at the market share trend or economies of scale for Six SOEs, as a source of the category for industry supply characteristics, total market share of Six SOEs has expanded continuously since 2004 without admitting any other makers to enter top six ranking. But the market share difference of inner group is hard to be explained only through strategic group characteristics. Thirdly, at the passenger car price strategy of JVs under Six SOEs or at the market-related strategies, three strategic groups; high price, middle price and low price group were confirmed through the correlation between the group median for average prices of car makers and the group median for revenue to profit ratios from 2007 to 2012. It was relatively very clear to differentiate JVs under Six SOEs from local makers through the passenger car price. Therefore it can be said that mobility barriers by market segmentation or brand recognition of JV makers is so high as to segregate Six SOEs as one strategic group.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Barney, Jay. B., "Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, 2nd edition" (2002), Prentice Hall
  2. Barney, Jay B., "Strategic Groups: Untested Assertions and Research Proposals", Managerial and Decision Economics, 11, pp.187~198 (1990)
  3. Caves, R. E., "From entry barriers to mobility barriers: conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, pp.241~262 (1977)
  4. 최병헌, "A Study on Rivalry Structure of Automobile Industry of China: Focusing on Shanghai, Jilin and Guangdong Province", 동아연구, 31(2), pp.111~149 (2012), 동아연구소
  5. Choi, Byunghun, "The Sustainability of Joint Ventures between State Owned Enterprises and Global Firms for Car Making Business in China", Journal of Business and Economics, 5(4), pp.462~483 (2014)
  6. Dranove, David, "Do Strategic Groups Exist? An Economic Framework for Analysis", Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp.1029~1044 (1998)
  7. Fiegenbaum, Avi, "Exploring the Linkage between Strategic Groups and Competitive Strategy", International Studies of Management and Organization, 18(1), pp.6~25 (1987)
  8. Hatten, Kenneth J., "Strategic Groups, Asymmetrical Mobility Barriers and Contestability", Strategic Management Journal, 8, pp.329~342 (1987)
  9. Marlin, Dan, "Equifinality and the Strategic Groups-Performance Relationship", Journal of Managerial Issues, 19(2), pp.208~232 (2007)
  10. Mascarenhas, Briance, "Mobility Barriers and Strategic Group", Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp.475~485 (1989)
  11. Mcgee, John, "Strategic Groups: Theory, Research and Taxonomy", Strategic Management Journal, 7, pp.141~160 (1986)
  12. Peng, Mike W., "Controlling the Foreign Agent: How Governments Deal with Multinationals in Transition Economy", Management International Review, 40, pp.141~165 (2000)
  13. Peng, Mike W., "Global Strategy" (2006), South-Western
  14. Porter, Michael E., "The Structure within Industries and Company Performance: A Structural Analysis of Acute-Care Hospitals", Journal of Management, 30, pp.97~121 (1979)
  15. Porter, Michael E., "Clusters and New Economics of Competition", Harvard Business Review, 76(6), pp.77~90 (1998)
  16. Reger, Rhonda K., "Strategic Groups: A Cognitive Perspective", Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp.103~124 (1993)
  17. Thomas, Howard, "Assessing Mobility Barriers in Dynamic Strategic Groups Analysis", Journal of Management Studies, 28(5), pp.429~438 (1991)
  18. Thomas, Howard, "From I-O Economics’ S-C-P Paradigm Through Strategic Groups to Competence-Based Competition: Reflections on the Puzzle of Competitive Strategy", British Journal of Management, 10, pp.127~140 (1999)
  19. "GM Forecasts 70,000 Cadillac Sales in China" (2014)[URL]
  20. "Nissan Forms Infiniti China Venture with Dongfeng" (2014)[URL]
  21. China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, "China Automotive Industry Yearbook 2008" (2008), Beijing Huazhonghua Press
  22. China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, "China Automotive Industry Yearbook 2009" (2009), Beijing Huazhonghua Press
  23. China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, "China Automotive Industry Yearbook 2010" (2010), Beijing Huazhonghua Press
  24. China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, "China Automotive Industry Yearbook 2011" (2011), Beijing Huazhonghua Press
  25. China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, "China Automotive Industry Yearbook 2012" (2012), Beijing Huazhonghua Press
  26. China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, "China Automotive Industry Yearbook 2013" (2013), Beijing Huazhonghua Press
  27. "China Association of Automobile Manufacturers" (2014)[URL]
  28. "China Association of Automobile Manufacturers"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)