본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

沈德潜『古诗源』诗观探微

A Study of poetry view in Shen Deqian’s Origin of Ancient Poems

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

选诗入集本就标准各异,而选评的标准本身就反映了编选者的诗学思想,欲了解编选者的诗学思想和诗观,也应探本溯源,从编选者编书的动机、其思想形成的背景中加以探讨。近年来,学界将沈德潜之诗歌选集和诗观贴上为封建统治阶层服务,严重阻碍诗歌发展的标签;也有部分学者认为,《古诗源》对诗家和诗歌选取标准和评论多来自于陈祚明《采菽堂古诗选》,故认定沈氏之诗观是承袭陈祚明而来,或由陈祚明先为其导路,使其免沦刻板教条。然而《古诗源》其实蕴含着沈德潜评选诗歌的慧眼,同时展现诗歌发展的历史根源和价值,可说是沈氏“溯诗源,倡诗教”的具体实践。本文先从沈德潜编选《古诗源》的动机乃为 “正诗风、溯诗源和倡诗教”立论,继而通过对《古诗源》序和例言以及各卷选评说明的整理,得出沈氏的选诗标准:举凡可“溯诗源,观升降者”、“格雅正,助诗教者”、“胸怀高,至真情者”皆予以选入,而“不合雅正诗教者、刻镂堆垛及缺乏自然风韵者、内容不可辩读或诗歌为伪作者”则“少选或不选”。从上述编书动机和选诗标准中,笔者归纳出《古诗源》蕴涵了沈氏四大诗观:重建古诗风貌之复古观,倡导雅正温厚之诗教观,展现探本溯源之诗史观和重意甚于炼字的创作观。足见沈德潜《古诗源》中之诗观并非仅承袭某古诗选本而来,乃是有其诗学底蕴和价值标准。

Abstract

The criterion of selecting poems to a poetry anthology is vary with each individual which reflected the poetic ideology of the selector. To know more about the poetry view of the poems selector, you should first know the motivation of bookmaking, and the background of his thought. In the recent years, Shen Deqian’s anthology was considered as working for a feudal govern by academia which gravely impede the poetry development. Some scholar think that the poets and poems evaluation standard of Origin of Ancient Poems was inspired by Chen Zuo Ming’s mining Shu Tang Poetry Election, thus they think that the poetry view of Shen Deqian is following Chen Zuo Ming’s, so as to make it not to be too rigid. Nevertheless, Origin of Ancient Poems indeed incorporates Shen Deqian’s insight of poetry selecting, and shows the historical origin and the value of poetry development. Literally, he practiced the view of tracing to the source and promoting gentle and honest manner in poetry. In this essay, I would firstly make a point by the motivations of making Origin of Ancient Poems is to trace to the source and to promote gentle and honest manner in poetry, and then reach the standard of poetry selection of Shen Deqian by understanding the foreword and evaluation in Origin of Ancient Poems: If one which can reach the standard might be elected, and if one which substandard Yazheng, is play-acting and lack of natural charm, or the contents cannot be read or the poem is fake then it would be less selective or even not be selected. From these motivations and standards of poetry election, I can conclude that there are 4 poetry view in Shen Deqian’s Origin of Ancient Poems; rebuilding the features of ancient poetry, promoting gentle and honest manner in poetry, tracing to the source and stressing on the meaning more than font. It is obvious that these poetry view does not follow from any classical poetry election, but it has its own poetic view and value.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 沈德潜, "古诗源" (1999), 世界书局
  2. 吴宏一, "清代文学批评资料汇编" (1978), 国立编译馆
  3. 霍松林, "原诗、一瓢诗话、诗诗晬语" (1979), 人民文学出版社
  4. 马亚中, "中国近代诗歌史" (1992), 学生书局
  5. 蒋凡, "叶燮与原诗" (1993), 万卷楼出版社
  6. 张健, "清代诗学研究" (1999), 北京大学出版社
  7. 郑莉芳, "沈德潜『古诗源』研究", 古典诗歌研究彙刊, 5(17) (2009)
  8. 王宏林, "沈德潜诗学思想研究" (2010), 人民出版社
  9. 蒋寅, "清代诗学史(第一卷)" (2012), 中国社会科学出版社
  10. 张伟, "论『古诗源』对『采菽堂古诗选』诗学思想的承袭", 中国韵文, 27(4) (2013)
  11. "沈德潜与古诗源", 江苏大学学报(社会科学版), 3 (2005)
  12. 段少华, "论王士祯与沈德潜的诗学思想之异同", 西昌学院学报-社会科学版, 20(3) (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)