借《杜律啟蒙》對邊連寶批 “神韻說”之因再剖析
A re analysis of Bian Lianbao’s refutation of romantic charm theory based on Rudimentary knowledge of Du Fu’s metrical verses
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this papers, the reasons for Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory are re analyzed by means of his work Rudimentary knowledge of Du Fu’s metrical verses. Through Bian’s interpretations, his pursuing for the gist of poems and his ideas of Poem writing、aesthetic feature and appraciation can be explored more deeply and specifically. In this way, the reasons why he had a sharp and critical attitude towards the theory of romantic charm are attempted to be found. In chapter 2, by using poetry creation as the breakthrough point, it is revealed that Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory is focused on its absence of “tempermament”. However, the study on Wang Shizhen’s works of poetry comment, such as 《Dai Jing Tang Shi Hua》, gives a different conclusion. Wang’s concept of “tempermament” is not as narrow as Bian had criticized. Then, by analyzing and summarizing the idea about “tempermament” which Bian has presented in his work, along with Du Fu’s metrical verses, which were classified as the works of “tempermament” or “romantic charm”. Comparing with Wang’s concept of “tempermament”, Bian’s is obviously narrower, and the spirits of two are distinctly different, which leads to the principal reason of his refutation of romantic charm theory. In chapter 3, Bian’s refutation on the idea that Poems of “romantic charm” cannot be interpreted is introduced and discoursed. His propose of “unfolding the concealed meaning”, as a matter of fact, is an appreciation theory which inherited from his concept of “tempermament”. Finally, specific examples were given to experience how Bian was “unfolding the concealed meaning”.
Abstract
In this papers, the reasons for Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory are re analyzed by means of his work Rudimentary knowledge of Du Fu’s metrical verses. Through Bian’s interpretations, his pursuing for the gist of poems and his ideas of Poem writing、aesthetic feature and appraciation can be explored more deeply and specifically. In this way, the reasons why he had a sharp and critical attitude towards the theory of romantic charm are attempted to be found. In chapter 2, by using poetry creation as the breakthrough point, it is revealed that Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory is focused on its absence of “tempermament”. However, the study on Wang Shizhen’s works of poetry comment, such as 《Dai Jing Tang Shi Hua》, gives a different conclusion. Wang’s concept of “tempermament” is not as narrow as Bian had criticized. Then, by analyzing and summarizing the idea about “tempermament” which Bian has presented in his work, along with Du Fu’s metrical verses, which were classified as the works of “tempermament” or “romantic charm”. Comparing with Wang’s concept of “tempermament”, Bian’s is obviously narrower, and the spirits of two are distinctly different, which leads to the principal reason of his refutation of romantic charm theory. In chapter 3, Bian’s refutation on the idea that Poems of “romantic charm” cannot be interpreted is introduced and discoursed. His propose of “unfolding the concealed meaning”, as a matter of fact, is an appreciation theory which inherited from his concept of “tempermament”. Finally, specific examples were given to experience how Bian was “unfolding the concealed meaning”.
참고문헌 (15)
- 廣東, "辭源" (2001), 商務印書館
- 邊連寶, "杜律啟蒙" (2005), 齊魯書社
- 邊連寶, "病馀長語" (2013), 齊魯書社
- 蕭滌非, "杜甫全集校注" (2014), 人民文學出版社
- 王士禛, "帶經堂詩話" (1998), 人民文学出版社
- 蔣 寅, "王漁洋與康熙詩壇" (2013), 鳳凰出版社
- 金進暎, "翁方綱의 漁洋神韻說批評", 外大論叢, 10 (1992), 부산외국어대학교
- 徐 星, "邊連寶詩學理論與詩歌創作研究", 碩士, pp.2016
- 王 穎, "邊連寶 《杜律啟蒙》研究", 碩士, pp.2011
- 魏彩雲, "嚴羽 “興趣”說研究綜述", 韶關學院學報, 31 (2010), 韶關學院
- 劉青松, "清畿輔詩人邊連寶、戈濤詩歌理論初探", 華夏文化論壇, 44 (2015), 吉林大学中国文化研究所
- 張金明, "論北隨園邊連寶其人其詩", 深圳大學學報, 24 (2007), 深圳大學
- 韓成武, "邊連寶與 《杜律啟蒙》", 長沙大學學報, 20 (2006), 長沙學院
- 韓 勝, "南北隨園詩論對比研究", 碩士, pp.2002
- 頡 斌, "北隨園詩論", 碩士, pp.2000
