从认知语义视角辨析“机会与机遇”
A Consideration on the Meanings of 'Chance(机会)' and 'Occasion(机遇)' in the Cognitive Perspective
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article I inquired into the meanings of 'chance(机会)' and 'occasion(机遇)' in three aspects. The two words are synonyms which have a nominal property, being consisted of a noun plus a verb. First, I analysed lexical meanings and meaning systems of the two words, and found out morphemic characteristics of 机(jī), 会(huì), and 遇(yu)̀ included in the two words. Second, I deducted the intrinsic elements of the two words, which are ambiguous and similar, but have different meanings according to the contexts, through their daily usages. From this deduction I introduced what makes the ambiguity and difference of their meanings by categorization and conceptualization theory, and clarified their differences in the sameness, and their sameness in the differences. Lastly, I examined the categorized meaning structures of the two words through their daily usages in modern chinese and ancient chinese, respectively. My findings are (1) Categorized fields of the two words in modern & ancient chinese show similar aspects, while their meaning fields show a great difference. (2) In modern chinese 'chance' is used in almost all social fields, while 'occasion' is mainly used in the fields of economy and trade, natural sciences. (3) In modern & ancient chinese the 'chance' is more frequently used than the 'occasion', and more diversely in categorized meaning fields.
Abstract
In this article I inquired into the meanings of 'chance(机会)' and 'occasion(机遇)' in three aspects. The two words are synonyms which have a nominal property, being consisted of a noun plus a verb. First, I analysed lexical meanings and meaning systems of the two words, and found out morphemic characteristics of 机(jī), 会(huì), and 遇(yu)̀ included in the two words. Second, I deducted the intrinsic elements of the two words, which are ambiguous and similar, but have different meanings according to the contexts, through their daily usages. From this deduction I introduced what makes the ambiguity and difference of their meanings by categorization and conceptualization theory, and clarified their differences in the sameness, and their sameness in the differences. Lastly, I examined the categorized meaning structures of the two words through their daily usages in modern chinese and ancient chinese, respectively. My findings are (1) Categorized fields of the two words in modern & ancient chinese show similar aspects, while their meaning fields show a great difference. (2) In modern chinese 'chance' is used in almost all social fields, while 'occasion' is mainly used in the fields of economy and trade, natural sciences. (3) In modern & ancient chinese the 'chance' is more frequently used than the 'occasion', and more diversely in categorized meaning fields.
참고문헌 (31)
- 董秀芳, "汉语的词库与词法" (2004), 北京大学出版社
- 卢英顺, "现代汉语词汇学" (2007), 复旦大学出版社
- 凌剑春, "从原型范畴化理论看语义模糊现象", 文学语言学研究 (2007)
- 刘雪春, "现代汉语等同范畴的语义认知研究", 博士, pp.2004
- 李福印, "认知语言学概论" (2008), 北京大学出版社
- 凌剑春, "从原型范畴化理论看语义模糊现象", 文学语言学研究 (2007)
- 高树藩, "中正形音义综合大字典" (1974), 中正书局股份有限公司出版社
- 何 立, "语言文字词典" (1999), 学苑出版社
- 黄津孚, "机会和机遇的语义学比较及经营决策", 福建论坛·人文社会科学版, (11) (2006)
- 蒋岳春, "“界”理论对词类的解释力", 长春师范学院学报, (3) (2004)
- 石毓智, "语法的认知语义基础" (2000), 北京大学出板
- 石毓智, "肯定与否定的对称与不对称" (2001), 北京语言文化大学出版社
- 沈家煊, "不对称和标记论" (1999), 江西教育出版社
- 沈家煊, "“有界”与“无界”", 中国语文, (5) (1995)
- 邵敬敏, "现代汉语通论" (2007), 上海教育出版社
- 束定芳, "认知语义学" (2008), 上海外语教育出版社
- 杨寄洲, "近义词用法对比" (2005), 北京语言大学出版社
- 周 荐, "汉语词汇结构论" (2004), 上海辞书出版社
- 张志毅, "新华同义词词典" (2005), 商务印书馆
- 张 斌, "现代汉语虚词" (2001), 华东师范大学出版社
- 张 敏, "认知语言学与汉语名词短语" (1998), 中国社会科学出版社
- 曹 炜, "现代汉语词义学" (2001), 学林出版社
- 吴福祥, "汉语语法化研究" (2005), 商务印书馆
- 汪立荣, "框架语义学对二语词汇教学的启示" (2011), 外语研究
- 王 寅, "体验哲学与认知语言学对语言成因的解释力", 国外社会科学, (6) (2005)
- 王 寅, "认知语言学的意义新观: 体验性概念化", 解放军外国语学院学报, (4) (2008)
- 中国社科院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2002), 商务印书馆
- Ungerer, F., "An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics" (1996), Longman
- Rosch, E., "Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (1978)
- Lakoff, George, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Wilkins, D. A, "Linguistics in Language Teaching" (1972), The MIT Press. Massachusetts Institute of Technology