‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’자 피동문 문법 설명에 대한 재고
Study on the Grammatical Interpretation of ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ in Passive Sentences
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본고에서는 먼저 7종 문법서에 수록된 ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’자 피동문의 문법 설명에 대한 분석을 진행하였다. 분석 결과 대부분 문법 설명이 전면적이지 못하고 다음과 같은 문제점이 존재함을 발견하였다. 첫째, ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’자 피동문에 대한 인식 부족둘째, ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’자 피동문의 행위자 생략 가능 여부에 대한 설명 부족셋째, ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’자 피동문의 의미색채에 대한 설명 부족넷째, ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’자 피동문과 동일한 구조를 지닌 구문과의 비교 부족다음으로 앞서 진행한 문법 설명 분석을 통해 드러난 기존 문법서의 문제점을 바탕으로 ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’자 피동문에 대한 설명을 좀 더 자세하고 전면적으로 제시해 보았는데, 이를 표로 정리하면 다음과 같다. 기존의 문법서에서는 ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’자 피동문에 대한 설명이 매우 부족하고 정확하지 않은 내용도 있어 학습자의 오류를 유발하고 있다. 학습자를 오도하지 않으려면 지금까지 상대적으로 소홀히 다뤄온 ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’자 피동문에 대한 보다 정확하고 전면적인 설명이 필요하다. 이상의 논의 내용이 중국어 피동문에 대한 연구 및 중국어교육에 일조할 수 있기를 기대한다.
Abstract
In this paper, I have reviewed and analyzed the grammatical explanations of ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ in passive sentences from the existing seven grammar books. I have learned that the currently existing books failed to provide comprehensive interpretation on the grammar of ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ in passive sentences and my review and analysis revealed several weakness in current explanations, for which alternative and more detailed interpretations were proposed in this paper. The followings are the problems that I found: 1. The lack of mention of ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ passive sentences. 2. The lack of explanation for the omission of NP2 in the ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ passive sentences. 3. The lack of explanation about the semantic colors of ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ passive sentences. 4. The lack of comparisons for the phrases that have the same structure as ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ passive sentences. I am proposing more detailed and comprehensive explanations in the ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ passive sentences as follows: ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ passive sentences structure : NP1+叫/让/给+NP2+VP 他叫雨淋了。(He got wet with rain.) 羊让狼吃了。(A sheep was eaten by a wolf.) 我的自行车给(人)偷了。(My bike was stolen by a thief.) characteristics : ①NP1 is a definite ingredient which may be abbreviated in colloquial dialogue. ②‘叫’, ‘让’ and ‘给’ are all used in colloquial style, but ‘给’ is a little bit more colloquial than ‘叫’, ‘让’. They are, however, replaceable each other as passive marker in the colloquial language. ③‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ passive sentences have basically negative meanings abut sometimes have a neutral meanings. ④‘给’ is a passive marker originally observed in southern dialects, but it is now also found in northern dialects. ⑤NP2 after ‘叫’ and ‘让’ cannot be omitted. It is grammaticalized from causative verb to passive marker and it should reflect the characteristics of causative sentences which requires NP2. On the other hand, it is possible to omit NP2 after ‘给’ because it is grammaticalized from dative verb meaning of ‘giving’ to passive marker and the dative verb itself can be used without NP2. ⑥ A verb cannot appear alone in VP. Either complement, object or aspect particle must appear with a verb in VP. ‘着’ is not used in general, but it can be used in sentences that indicate a command or request. Auxiliary verbs, adverbs, and time nouns appear before the passive marker. ⑦‘叫’, ‘让’ passive sentences has the same sentence structure as the ‘叫’, ‘让’ causative sentences and it is same that NP2 is the agent of VP. However, the characteristics of the NP1 is different in between passive sentences and causative sentences and the components of VP are also different. ‘给’ passive sentences has the same sentence structure as the ‘给’ prepositional phrases but the agent of VP are different. It is found that the currently existing grammar books provide very limited and vague explanations about ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ passive sentences, which misleads the student to the ambiguous use of those words. I believe it is necessary to provide explicit and comprehensive interpretation for ‘叫’, ‘让’, ‘给’ passive sentences and it will be an honor if the above discussions could make any contribution to the study of Chinese passive sentences and Chinese language education.
참고문헌 (32)
- 李德津, "外国人实用汉语语法" (2006), 北京语言大学出版社
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2003), 商务印书馆
- 卢福波, "实用对外汉语教学语法" (2006), 北京大学出版社
- 马真, "100개 포인트로 쉽게 풀어낸 중국어문법" (2006), 다락원
- 守屋宏则, "베이징 중국어 기초문법" (2010), 시사중국어사
- 相原茂, "왜?라는 질문에 속 시원히 답해주는 중국어문법책" (2014), 시사중국어사
- 김종호, "도표로 보는 정통중국어문법" (2007), 한티미디어
- 陈前瑞, "字被动句的地位及其历史发展", 方言, (4) (2005)
- 傅雨贤, "现代汉语介词研究" (1997), 中山大学出版社
- 国家对外汉语教学领导小组办公室汉语水平考试部, "汉语水平等级标准与语法等级大纲" (1996), 高等教育出版社
- 蒋绍愚, "近代汉语研究概要" (2017), 北京大学出版社
- 李炜, "清中叶以来北京话的被动“给”及其相关问题─兼及“南方官话”被动的“给”", 中山大学学报, (3) (2004)
- 孟琮, "汉语动词用法词典" (2003), 商务印书馆
- 李行健, "现代汉语规范词典" (2004), 外语教学与研究出版社·语文出版社
- 卢福波, "对外汉语教学实用语法" (2014), 北京语言大学出版社
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1999), 商务印书馆
- 朴乡兰, "近代汉语表使役与表被动的“教", 叫”字句研究, 北京大学, 2011
- 王力, "汉语史稿" (1980), 中华书局
- 张斌, "现代汉语虚词词典" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 张斌, "现代汉语描写语法" (2010), 商务印书馆
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2012), 商务印书馆
- 周小兵, "外国人学汉语语法偏误研究" (2007), 北京语言大学出版社
- 朱德熙, "语法讲义" (1982), 商务印书馆
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어 문법 1" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 노지영, "코퍼스를 활용한 중국어 문법수업의 설계 및 적용 - ‘把’구문을 중심으로", 중국연구, 55, pp.21~45 (2012), 중국연구소
- 도혜진, "현대 중국어 "피","양","규","급" 피동문 분석", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.2009
- 박미정, "현대 중국어의 사동 구문 연구", 중국어문학논집, (18) (2001)
- 박향란, "유형론적 관점에서 본 중국어 사동⋅피동 겸용의 기원", 중국언어연구, (41), pp.275~295 (2012), 한국중국언어학회
- 최재영, "중국어 '주다'의미 동사의 문법화 小考-동사 ‘’의 2차변환설과 1차변환설의 비교를 중심으로-", 중국학연구, (41), pp.49~72 (2007), 중국학연구회
- 최재영, "중 · 한 피동문 대조 연구", 중국어문논역총간, (22), pp.81~111 (2008), 중국어문논역학회
- Charles N. Li, "Mandarin Chinese A Functional Reference Grammar" (1989), University of California Press
