중국 농촌 토지재산권의 지역별 제도적합성에 관한 연구
A study on the regional suitability of rural land property rights in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study divides China into six type areas based on regional economic conditions to construct panel data. Based on the panel data, the analysis of the regional differences in the changes in the rural land property rights system shows that the effects of institutional changes are the largest in the fourth type area, followed by the fifth and first type area, and the sixth type the lowest. The results of the analysis show that it fits the assumption of "regional type-institution suitability". In general, the same institutional arrangement will have different effects between different types of areas. Second, the coefficients of institutional variables show that the higher the level of economic development, the greater the institutional effect of regions with relatively. The fifth type and the first type are both eastern coastal areas, and the level of economic development is very high. The fourth type area reflects a special situation, that is, Heilongjiang and Inner Mongolia have the largest land area and the largest per capita arable land area. Since the revision of the land property rights system, such system changes have made farmers expect stable income. Therefore, it can be understood that these two regions show the effect of scale because of the large size of the land. Finally, the results of the regional comparative analysis show that in order to exert the institutional effect, a reasonable and appropriate allocation and investment of factor resources are required. Although the third type of region is rich in labor and land resources, the system has little effect. In addition, the limitation of the lack of elements in the system's effectiveness cannot be ruled out. The sixth type of area is an area that objectively lacks resources. The institutional role of this area is quite limited.
Abstract
This study divides China into six type areas based on regional economic conditions to construct panel data. Based on the panel data, the analysis of the regional differences in the changes in the rural land property rights system shows that the effects of institutional changes are the largest in the fourth type area, followed by the fifth and first type area, and the sixth type the lowest. The results of the analysis show that it fits the assumption of "regional type-institution suitability". In general, the same institutional arrangement will have different effects between different types of areas. Second, the coefficients of institutional variables show that the higher the level of economic development, the greater the institutional effect of regions with relatively. The fifth type and the first type are both eastern coastal areas, and the level of economic development is very high. The fourth type area reflects a special situation, that is, Heilongjiang and Inner Mongolia have the largest land area and the largest per capita arable land area. Since the revision of the land property rights system, such system changes have made farmers expect stable income. Therefore, it can be understood that these two regions show the effect of scale because of the large size of the land. Finally, the results of the regional comparative analysis show that in order to exert the institutional effect, a reasonable and appropriate allocation and investment of factor resources are required. Although the third type of region is rich in labor and land resources, the system has little effect. In addition, the limitation of the lack of elements in the system's effectiveness cannot be ruled out. The sixth type of area is an area that objectively lacks resources. The institutional role of this area is quite limited.
참고문헌 (47)
- 강승호, "중국 지방정부의 렌트추구와 성장패턴", 동북아경제연구, 23(3), pp.135~162 (2011), 한국동북아경제학회
- 중국 농촌토지의 사장화 개혁 가속화: 3차 산업에 최초 개방, "김부용", 대외경제정책연구원, ~ (2017)
- 김수한, "중국 도시 토지제도 개혁과 지방정부 행위분석:토지사용권 양도시장을 중심으로", 한중사회과학연구, 6(2), pp.31~54 (2008), 한중사회과학학회
- 박상호, "中國土地制度에 관한 硏究－土地使用權을 中心으로－", 토지법학, (22), pp.161~172 (2006), 한국토지법학회
- 이기현, "중국 개혁기 토지수입 분배 갈등과 중앙-지방 관계의 동학", 국제지역연구, 13(2), pp.239~260 (2009), 국제지역연구센터
- 이혁구, "중국 농촌토지유통시장의 발전현황 및 평가 －광둥성 사례를 중심으로－", 동북아경제연구, 24(4), pp.149~172 (2012), 한국동북아경제학회
- 이혁구, "로짓모형을 이용한 중국 농촌 토지유통의 영향요인 분석－광둥성 중산시와 둥관시를 중심으로－", 동북아경제연구, 26(4), pp.67~89 (2014), 한국동북아경제학회
- 2015 중국 兩會 ‘삼농’문제와 농촌 토지제도개혁에 관한 소고, "이혁구", 대외경제정책연구원, ~ (2015)
- 이혁구, "중국 농촌 토지재산권 변천에 관한 연구", 제99차 중국학연구회 정기학술대회 발표문 (2015)
- 조동제, "中國 建設用地使用權 流動制度의 법률적 검토", 서울대학교 법학, 51(3), pp.231~255 (2010), 법학연구소
- 혜우군, "중국 농촌 토지재산권 제도변천에 관한 실증분석－1949-2013년 시계열 자료를 중심으로－", 동북아경제연구, 27(4), pp.201~221 (2015), 한국동북아경제학회
- 혜우군, "중국 고대 토지제도 “균전제”의 제도변천 - 신제도주의 경제학 관점을 중심으로 -", 중국과 중국학, 29, pp.83~102 (2016), 중국연구센터[DOI]
- Alchian, A. A., "The Property rights Paradigm", The Journal of Economic History, 33(1), pp.16~27 (1973)
- Brandtl, "Land rights in China: faets, fietions, and lssues", China journal, 47, pp.67~97 (2002)
- Local government behavior and Property rights formation in rural China, "Brandtl", University of Toronto, ~ (2002)
- Eggertsson, "Economic Behavior and Institutions" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Klaus D, "The potential of land rental markets in the process of economic development: evidence from China", Journal of Development Economies, 8(1), pp.241~270 (2005)
- Lohamar B, "Land Rental market development and agricultural Production in China", Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting (2001)
- North, "Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Williamson, "Markets and Hierarchies" (1975), Free Press
- Yao Y, "The development of land lease market in rural China", Land Economies, 76(2), pp.252~266 (2000)
- 蓝虹, "中国土地产权制度演进的制度经济分析" (2005), 陕西人民出版社
- 梁小民, "高级宏观经济学教程" (1993), 北京大学出版社
- 钱忠好, "中国农村土地制度变迁和创新研究" (1999), 中国农业出版社
- 钱忠好, "中国农村土地制度历史变迁的经济学分析", 江苏社会科学-经济研究, (2), pp.83~84 (2011)
- 孙少岩, "从制度经济学角度分析土地流转", 税务与经济, (1), pp.6~10 (2007)
- 孙海兵, "农地城市流转的博弈分析", 农村经济, (3), pp.39~41 (2006)
- 姚 洋, "土地、制度和农业发展" (2005), 北京大学出版社
- 姚 洋, "集体决策下的诱导性制度变迁", 中国农村观察, (2), pp.11~20 (2002)
- 杨德才, "家庭承包制下的农地制度比较分析", 当代经济研究, (5), pp.59~62 (2003)
- 张红宇, "对当前农地制度创新的几点看法与评论", 农村经济, (8), pp.5~9 (2005)
- 张新光, "论中国农地产权私有化改革的根本性障碍", 兰州商学院学报, (6), pp.1~6 (2004)
- 陈志刚, "农地产权制度的演变与耕地绩效—对转型期中国的实证分析", 财经研究, (6), pp.25~30 (2003)
- 金松青, "中国农村土地租赁市场的发展及其在土地使用公平性和效率性上的含义", 经济学季刊, (4), pp.1003~1027 (2004)
- 黄少安, "1950-1962年中国土地制度与农业经济增长的实证分析", 西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 39(6), pp.67~ (2009)
- 冀县卿, "改革开放后中国农地产权结构变迁与制度绩效：理论与实证分析", 博士, pp.2010
- 徐春祥, "新型城镇化与区域经济协调发展研究—以辽宁省为例", 沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版), 8(1), pp.64~69 (2015)
- 曾繁清, "金融体系与产业结构的耦合协调度分析—基于新结构经济学视角", 经济评论, 3, pp.134~147 (2017)
- 廖重斌, "环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系—以珠江三角洲城市群为例", 热带地理, 19(2), pp.134~147 (1999)
- 陈志, "改革开放以来湖北省城市化与经济协调发展研究", 湖北大学学报: 自然科学版, 29(3), pp.307~311 (2017)
- 王西琴, "城市化与经济协调发展的实证研究:以四川省为例", 生态经济, 10, pp.29~36 (2008)
- 段瑞君, "中国城市化与经济增长关系的计量分析", 经济问题探索, 3, pp.26~60 (2009)
- 施建刚, "中国城市化与经济增长关系实证分析", 城市问题, 9, pp.8~13 (2011)
- 温铁军, "我国为什么不能实行农村土地私有化", 红旗文稿, (2), pp.15~17 (2009)
- 温铁军, "靠“土地私有化”解决农村问题是南辕北辙", 理论参考, (1), pp.54~ (2009)
- 钟涨宝, "农地流转过程中的农户行为分析-湖北, 浙江等地的农户问卷调查", 中国农村观察, (6), pp.55~64 (2003)
- 叶剑平, "中国农村土地流转市场的调查研究－基于2005年17省调查的分析和建议", 中国农村观察, (4), pp.48~55 (2006)