현대 중국어 비전형적 이중목적어 구문 고찰: O1이 장소목적어인 경우를 중심으로

Abstract

Construction grammar claims that a language consists of constructions. In particular, simple clause constructions can be expanded either internally or externally. This paper explores the generative mechanisms and characteristics of ‘place recipient-double object construction’ based on this perspective. This construction was first influenced by the typical double-objective construction. Chinese double objective constructions have high expandability, so it is polysemous, ‘place recipient-double object construction’ also has a polysemous relationship with the double-objective construction. In addition, this construction was influenced by the fugitive construction and ‘possessor-subject possessee-object’ construction, they are connected metaphorically to each other. This paper compared the relevant constructions which are ‘ba’ construction and ‘S+在NP+V+O’ construction to reveal the individual characteristics of the ‘place recipient-double object construction’. ‘place recipient-double object construction’ and ‘ba’ construction can commonly mean ‘movement of a theme from an agent to a place’, but the difference between the two constructions is the information value of O2. In A, the subject argument is of no informational value to the listener because it is an old information. ‘ba’ construction's theme is old information, so it has no informational value to the listener. On the other hand, ‘place recipient-double object construction’'s theme is new information, so it has informational value to the listener. ‘place recipient-double object construction’ and ‘S+在NP+V+O’ construction differ in terms of the prominence of place. In ‘S+在NP+V+O’ construction, a place argument is not profiled and it just functions as ground. On the other hand, a place argument of ‘place recipient-double object construction’ is a remarkable participant profiled as part of the whole process. This reflects the cognitive differences of speakers who perceive the same event differently.